JFK Assassination: Researchers discuss John McAdams
April 6, 2014
A series of articles (including three of mine) on John McAdams, the relentless Warren Commission apologist. http://richardcharnin.com/JMLaughingStock.html
The articles thoroughly debunk the pathetic arguments from the Professor of Disinformation. I enjoyed the devastating reviews of McAdams’ book “JFK Assassination Logic” by Pat Speer, David Mantik, Frank Cassano and Gary Aguilar.
Jim Hargrove asks: Since Mcadams is known to use the alias “Paul Nolan” just how many other names has he used to deceive? He claims to be many things. A jet-propulsion expert, or Crackpot?
Here is what was discovered.
Isabel Kirk: McAdams is not just a fraud as a teacher. He is a corrupt man. He is an evangelist for corruption and fraud. He has sought and enlisted disciples, and they employ his knowingly fraudulent “methodology” in their writing “assignments,” many of which are posted to the website of Marquette University.
Jim DiEugenio with Brian Hunt:
“McAdams did indeed make comments that were intended to imply that Gary Aguilar was a drug addict. IMO, they were deliberate, malicious and intended to smear the doctor.”
John Simkin: “The Education Forum”
If you do any research of major figures in the JFK assassination via web search engines you will soon find yourself on John McAdams’ website. He is clearly the main disinformation source on the net.
Debra Hartman writes:
…McAdams has neither the educational preparation nor the ability for such a position — his language skills are abysmal; his analytical skills non-existent. Not only has he done no research whatsoever on the historical question he pretends to study, he has no knowledge of even the basics of a research methodology. Thus, McAdams himself argues against long established historical facts; on the other hand, he is incapable of doing the research necessary to either confirm or dispute such facts.
And on and on….
I just added an Amazon book sales sheet to JFK Calc.
Judyth Baker’s “Me and Lee” has the highest reader rank at 4.70.
McAdams’ book is far down the totem pole with a 2.38 reader rating out of 5. His sales rank is at 944,700, far below the others. He is a laughingstock all right.
The average rank for the six books that are fact-based is 4.51. McAdams’ 2.38 rank is based on disinformation.
McAdams has had just 16 reviews in three years. NINE (9) are at level 1 (the lowest), 1 is at level 2. Only 3 are level 5. Ten of 16 reviews thought his book stunk. Compare that to Judyth Baker who had 188 reviews in three years with 163 at level 5.
Of the 6 factual books, 793 of 1039 reviews (76%) were at level 5. For McAdams, 3 of 18 (19%) were at level 5.
IT’S NO CONTEST: JFK RESEARCHERS HAVE WON THE DEBATE HANDS DOWN. ONLY MAINSTREAM MEDIA AND WARREN COMMISSION APOLOGISTS LIKE MCADAMS WON’T ADMIT IT.
Amazon Reader ranks (1 lowest to 5 highest)
Sales rank 1 2 3 4 5 Total Average
4/2013 Hit List: Belzer, Wayne
33985 10 1 10 29 74 124 4.26
10/2013 Survivors Guilt: Vince Palamara
88519 8 3 2 7 83 103 4.50
10/2013 They Killed Our President: Ventura, Russell, Wayne
26202 12 2 11 36 125 186 4.40
10/2010 JFK and the Unspeakable: James Douglass
7441 23 11 16 37 333 420 4.54
10/2013 Crossfire: Jim Marrs
47599 1 0 0 2 15 18 4.67
10/2011 Me and Lee Judyth Baker
53426 7 2 6 10 163 188 4.70 < THE BEST
9/2011 How to Think About Claims of Conspiracy: McAdams
944700 9 1 0 3 3 16 2.38 < THE WORST