RSS

# Tag Archives: national exit

## Matrix of Deceit: Election Myths, Logic and Probability of Fraud

Election Fraud: Uncertainty, Logic and Probability

Oct. 29, 2012

Everyone thinks about problems every day. But how sure are they that their conclusions on how to solve them are valid? My new book Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts deals with uncertainty in our election systems. How do we know that the votes are counted as cast? If the information we are given is tainted, how do we know? We must distinguish between intuitive and logical reasoning. Yet decisions must be made everyday where there are multiple choices.

Which make the most sense? Which is the most probable? If you flip a coin and it comes up heads five times in a row, is the next flip more likely to be tails? Is a baseball player with a .300 batting average who has not had a base hit in his last 10 at bats due to get one his next time up? In decision making, we always need to consider probabilities.

In mathematics we need unambiguous definitions and rules. In other words, we need logical thinking. Logic is defined as a systematic study of the conditions and procedures required to make valid inferences.

We start with a statement and infer other statements are valid and justified as a consequence of the initial statement. It is important to note that logical inference does not mean the statement is true, only that it is valid. If the starting statement is true, then a logically derived result must also be true.

For example, it is a statement of fact that Bush had 50.5 million recorded votes in 2000. Approximately 2.5 million Bush 2000 voters died prior to the 2004 election, so there could not have been more than 48 million returning Bush voters. But according to the 2004 National Exit Poll, there were 52.6 million returning Bush voters. This is clearly impossible.

Furthermore, since the 2004 National Exit Poll was impossible and adjusted to match the recorded vote, then the recorded vote must also have been impossible. This simple deductive reasoning proves 2004 Election Fraud. But the recorded 2000 vote was also fraudulent – as were all elections before that. None reflected true voter intent. The simple proof: there were 6-10 million uncounted votes in every election prior to 2004. Votes cast exceeded votes recorded by 6-10 million. And 70-80% of the uncounted votes were Democratic.

Each National Exit poll is forced to match the bogus recorded vote based on bogus returning voters from the prior bogus election. It’s a recursive process. The polls assume all elections are fair and accurate. The same returning voter logic applied to the 1988, 1992 and 2008 elections shows that they were also fraudulent; the National Exit Polls were forced to match the recorded vote by indicating there were more returning Bush voters than were alive to vote. The corporate media has never seen fit to explain these recurring impossibilities.

Science is “cumulative”. New developments may refine or extend past knowledge. There is no such thing as a foolproof system. What is needed is a probability-based system for many types of problems. It is the only rational way of thinking.

There is no way to eliminate all risk (error) in a system model (or election poll). The problem is to evaluate risk and measure it based on a probability analysis. Every important problem requires a comparison of the odds. Probability analysis supplements classical logical thinking but does not replace it. In fact, classical logic is required in every step in the development of probability theory.

Election Model Forecast; Post-election True Vote Model

2004 Election Model (2-party shares)
Kerry 51.8%, 337 EV (snapshot)
State exit poll aggregate: 51.7%, 337 EV
Recorded Vote: 48.3%, 255 EV
True Vote Model: 53.6%, 364 EV

2008 Election Model
Obama 53.1%, 365.3 EV (simulation mean);
Recorded: 52.9%, 365 EV
State exit poll aggregate: 58.0%, 420 EV
True Vote Model: 58.0%, 420 EV

2012 Election Model
Obama Projected: 51.6% (2-party), 332 EV snapshot; 320.7 expected; 321.6 mean
Adjusted National Exit Poll (recorded): 51.0-47.2%, 332 EV
True Vote Model 56.1%, 391 EV (snapshot); 385 EV (expected)
Unadjusted State Exit Polls: not released
Unadjusted National Exit Poll: not released

4 Comments

Posted by on October 29, 2012 in Uncategorized

## The Final 2004 National Exit Poll switched 6.7% of Kerry responders to Bush

The myth that the early 2004 exit polls were biased for Kerry is refuted by the National Exit Poll (NEP) timeline. Kerry had 51% at 4pm (8,349 respondents). His exit poll share remained constant up to the final 13,660 respondents (51.7%). The pollsters had to switch 471 (6.7%) of Kerry’s 7,064 responders to Bush in order to have the Final NEP match the recorded vote. Assuming that Kerry had 51.7% of 125.7 million votes cast, he won by nearly 6 million votes. The True Vote Model indicates that he had 53.6% and won by 10 million.

To view the 1988-2008 Unadjusted State and National Exit Poll Database click this link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjAk1JUWDMyRdFIzSTJtMTJZekNBWUdtbWp3bHlpWGc#gid=15

The source data is provided by the Roper Center UConn

The data for each election is viewed by clicking the indicated tab at the top of the screen. State exit polls are displayed in the same row as the recorded vote. The national aggregate exit poll is calculated by weighting the state exit poll shares by votes cast.
Aggregate National share = Sum(exit poll(i) * state weight(i)) / National Votes Cast, i = 1,51 states

11/2/04 3:59pm, 8349 respondents
http://www.richardcharnin.com/US2004G_3737_PRES04_NONE_H_Data-1.pdf

Kerry 51.0%; Bush 47.0%
``` Voted Mix Kerry Bush Other DNV.. 15% 62% 37% 1% Gore. 39% 91% 8% 1% Bush. 42% 9% 90% 1% Other 4% 61% 12% 27%```

``` ```

```Total 100% 51% 47% 2% ```

11/2/04 7:33pm, 11027 respondents
http://www.richardcharnin.com/US2004G_3798_PRES04_NONE_H_Data.pdf

Kerry 50.9%; Bush 47.1%
``` Vote04 Mix Kerry Bush Other DNV.. 17% 59% 39% 2% Gore. 38% 91% 8% 1% Bush. 41% 9% 90% 1% Other 4% 65% 13% 22%```

``` ```

```Total 100% 50.9% 47.1% 2.0% ```

11/3/04 12:22am, 13047 respondents
http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/elections/2004/graphics/exitpolls_us_110204.gif

Kerry 51.2%; Bush 47.5%
``` Vote04 Mix Kerry Bush Other DNV.. 17% 57% 41% 2% Gore. 39% 91% 8% 1% Bush. 41% 10% 90% 0% Other 3% 64% 17% 19%```

``` ```

```Total 100% 51.2% 47.5% 1.3% ```

Unadjusted National Exit Poll, 13660 respondents (true sample)
Data Source: Roper Center UConn

Kerry 51.7%; Bush 47.0%
``` Total Kerry Bush Other 13660 7064 6414 182 Share 51.7% 47.0% 1.3%```

``` Vote04  Mix Kerry Bush Other DNV.. 18.4% 57% 42% 1% Gore. 38.4% 91% 8% 1% Bush. 39.5% 10% 90% 0% Other 3.75% 64% 17% 19% ```

```Total 100% 51.7% 47.0% 1.3% ```

11/3/04 1:24pm, Final National Exit Poll, 13660 respondents (adjusted sample)
http://www.richardcharnin.com/US2004G_3970_PRES04_NONE_H_Data.pdf

The Final was forced to match recorded vote by switching approximately 471 (6.7%) of Kerry’s 7,064 respondents to Bush. The average within precinct exit poll discrepancy was a nearly identical 6.5%.

Final NEP (forced to match)
Kerry 48.3%; Bush 50.7%
``` Final Kerry Bush Other 13660 6593 6930 137 Share 48.3% 50.7% 1.0%```

``` Voted Mix Kerry Bush Other DNV.. 17% 54% 45% 1% Gore. 37% 90% 10% 0% Bush. 43% 9% 91% 0% Other 3% 71% 21% 8% ```

```Total 100% 48.5% 51.1% 0.4% ```
Unadjusted NEP: Gender Demographic
Kerry 51.8%; Bush 47.2%
``` Gender Mix Kerry Bush Other Male.. 46.0% 48.0% 51.0% 1.0% Female 54.0% 55.0% 44.0% 1.0%```

``` ```

```Total.. 100% 51.8% 47.2% 1.0% ```
Final Adjusted (forced to match recorded vote)
Kerry 47.8%; Bush 51.2%
``` Gender Mix Kerry Bush Other Male.. 46.0% 44.0% 55.0% 1.0% Female 54.0% 51.0% 48.0% 1.0%```

``` ```

```Total.. 100% 47.8% 51.2% 1.0% ```
True Vote Model
Kerry 53.5%; Bush 45.1%
``` Voted04 Mix Kerry Bush Other DNV.. 17.0% 57.0% 41.0% 2.0% Gore. 41.5% 91.0% 8.0% 1.0% Bush. 38.0% 10.0% 90.0% 0.0% Other 3.50% 64.0% 17.0% 19.0%```

``` ```

```Total 100 53.5% 45.1% 1.4% ```

2008
Obama had 61% in the unadjusted National Exit Poll (17836 respondents), but just a 52.87% recorded share. The pollsters had to effectively reduce Obama’s respondents from 10873 to 9430 (13.3%) in order to force the final NEP to match the recorded vote. The True Vote Model indicates that he had 58%.

Final NEP (Unadjusted)
Obama 61.0%; McCain 37.2%
``` Sample Obama McCain Other 17836 10873 6641 322 Share 61.0% 37.2% 1.8% ```

Final NEP (forced to match the recorded vote)
Obama 52.9%; McCain 45.6%
``` Sample Obama McCain Other 17,836 9,430 8,137 269 Share 52.9% 45.6% 1.5% ```
Unadjusted National Exit Poll (True Vote)
Obama 58.0%; McCain 40.4%
``` Voted04 Share Votes Mix Obama McCain Other Kerry 50.2% 57.1 43.4% 89.0% 9.0% 2.0% Bush. 44.6% 50.8 38.6% 17.0% 82.0% 1.0% Other 5.2% 5.9 4.5% 72.0% 26.0% 2.0% DNV.. .... 17.7 13.4% 71.0% 27.0% 2.0% ```

``` ```

```Total 100% 131.5 100% 58.0% 40.4% 1.6% Votes .... .... 131.5 76.3 53.0 2.2% ```
Final National Exit Poll (forced to match recorded)
Obama 52.9%; McCain 45.6%
``` Voted04 Share Votes Mix Obama McCain Other Kerry 42.5% 48.6 37.0% 89.0% 9.0% 2.0% Bush. 52.9% 60.5 46.0% 17.0% 82.0% 1.0% Other 4.6% 5.3 4.0% 72.0% 26.0% 2.0% DNV.. .... 17.1 13.0% 71.0% 27.0% 2.0%```

``` ```

```Total 100% 131.5 100% 52.9% 45.6% 1.5% Votes .... .... 131.5 69.5 60.0 2.0 ```
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#USP00p1

Final National Exit Poll – Gender (forced to match recorded)
Obama 52.7%; McCain 45.4%
``` Gender Mix Obama McCain Other Male.. 47.0% 49.0% 48.0% 3.0% Female 53.0% 56.0% 43.0% 1.0%```

``` ```

```Total. 100% 52.7% 45.4% 1.9% ```

Election Model Forecast; Post-election True Vote Model

2004 (2-party vote shares)
Model: Kerry 51.8%, 337 EV (snapshot)
State exit poll aggregate: 51.7%, 337 EV
Recorded Vote: 48.3%, 255 EV
True Vote Model: 53.6%, 364 EV

2008
Model: Obama 53.1%, 365.3 EV (simulation mean);
Recorded: 52.9%, 365 EV
State exit poll aggregate: 58.0%, 420 EV
True Vote Model: 58.0%, 420 EV

2012 (2-party state exit poll aggregate shares)
Model: Obama 51.6%, 332 EV (Snapshot)
Recorded : 51.6%, 332 EV
True Vote 55.2%, 380 EV

1 Comment

Posted by on February 21, 2012 in 2004 Election, Media