RSS

David Ray Griffin: The most prolific 9/11 truth teller

David Ray Griffin: The most prolific 9/11 truth teller has written at least 10 books on 9/11..https://www.thriftbooks.com/a/david-ray-griffin/204510/

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 11, 2021 in Uncategorized

 

LATEST VAERS (US) COVID VACCINE ADVERSE EVENT DATA

Richard Charnin Sept. 4, 2021

LINKS TO  BLOG POSTS

LATEST VAERS (US) COVID VACCINE ADVERSE EVENT DATA THROUGH AUG 8, 2021.

VAERS is a database maintained by the CDC.

THERE WERE AN ESTIMATED 250,000 DEATHS FROM VACCINES IN 7 MONTHS COMPARED TO 30,000 PURE COVID DEATHS (ZERO COMORBIDITIES} IN 20 MONTHS!

In 2021, there were 571,830 reports of adverse effects in 7 months (12,791 deaths). Only an estimated 1% of adverse events are reported in VAERS. There would be an estimated 250,000 deaths if 20% were reported and 1.25 million if 100% were reported.

Compare VAERS to the 665,000 total COVID deaths reported in 20 months. Only an estimated 5% (30,000) were pure COVID (ZERO COMORBIDITIES).

TOTAL ADVERSE EVENTS: DEATHS: 12,791, LIFE THREATENING: 13,140, PERMANENTLY DISABLED: 16,044, HOSPITALIZATIONS: 51,242, ANAPHYLAXIS: 5,282, BELL’S PALSY: 4,461, MISCARRIAGES: 1,505, HEART ATTACKS: 5,590, SEVERE ALLERGY: 24,305, SHINGLES: 6,784

“Adverse Events Reported Following COVID-19 Vaccinations” Updated Aug. 28, 2021. Prepared by Josh Guetzkow, PhD http://www.skirsch.com/covid/VAERS_reporting.pdf 

There has been a dramatic increase in the number of reports submitted to the US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) following the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines. For example, as of Aug. 6, 2021, reports of serious events and deaths following COVID-19 vaccines represented 39% of serious events and 51% of deaths ever reported to VAERS since 1990. In this report, I present data and analysis to respond to two questions about this increase:

1. Is the increase in reports due to the increase in the number of vaccinations?

2. Is the increase in reports due to what public health officials refer to as “stimulated reporting,” meaning that people are reporting more due to increased awareness of the existence of VAERS and/or increased fear surrounding the COVID-19 vaccines due to media exposure of adverse events, awareness of the reporting system, mobilization by vaccine critics, etc.

  • Like
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 4, 2021 in Uncategorized

 

Cyber Symposium: Votes Flipped in all 50 states

Richard Charnin Aug. 12, 2021

LINKS TO  BLOG POSTS

Interesting data results from the Cyber Symposium

1-Recorded and PCAP total votes EXACTLY match proving machine vote flips

2-Recorded (155.485 million) ; PCAP (155.484m)

3- 8.1% (6.5m) Trump PCAP cyber votes were FLIPPED to Biden: 80.7m to 74.2m

4-PCAP totals DO NOT include an estimated 8m EXCESS (illegal) ballots for Biden

5-Machine votes were flipped to Biden in each of the 50 states

Votes (millions) TRUMP BIDEN

Recorded (rigged): 74.2-81.3 ; 46.9-51.3% ; 232EV

PCAP(includes illegal Biden ballots}: 80.7-74.7 ; 51.9-48.1% (2-pty) ; 325EV

PCAP (deduct estimated 8m illegal Biden ballots): 80.7-67.3 ; 54.6-45.4% (2-pty) ; 347EV

Model1 (Party-ID): 79.1-66.1 ; 53.8-45.0% ; 389EV

View the results: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yh0YkXBVctdJwt0_XHrpCC6f7K30oEz0Vr13MiU5qT4/edit#gid=639160994

Where did the data come from? https://rumble.com/vl4me5-the-pcaps-august-13th-2021.html

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 12, 2021 in Uncategorized

 

My 2020 Election Model matches expert Seth Keshel’s analysis

Richard Charnin Aug. 3, 2021

LINKS TO  BLOG POSTS

Elections Expert Seth Keshel Releases National Fraud Numbers: Finds 8.1 Million Excess Votes in US Election, Affirms Trump Won PA, MI, WI, NV, AZ, GA and MN

Adjusting Keshel’s 2020 analysis to include vote flipping and comparing to my 2020 Election Model, Keshel determined that 8.1 million of Biden’s 81.2 million (10%) votes were excess (i.e. illegal). If the 10% adjustment is applied to each state, Trump is a winner by 74.2-73.3m with 311 Electoral Votes.

But what about votes flipped from Trump to Biden? Assume 10% of votes were flipped. Applying the 10% to each state, Trump wins by 81.6-65.7m and has 356 Electoral Votes. This is virtually the same result as the 2020 Election Model which is based on party-id voter turnout and estimated party-id vote shares.

Adjusted Keshel analysis. Go row 53: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yh0YkXBVctdJwt0_XHrpCC6f7K30oEz0Vr13MiU5qT4/edit#gid=12205940

2020 Election Model: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yh0YkXBVctdJwt0_XHrpCC6f7K30oEz0Vr13MiU5qT4/edit#gid=297739797

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 3, 2021 in Uncategorized

 

Covid-19 Quiz

Richard Charnin – July27, 2021

LINKS TO  BLOG POSTS

1How many PCR cycles required for Covid case confirmation?
a) 20, b) 30, c) 40
2How may seniors died after transfer to NYC Nursing homes?
a) 5,000, b)10,000, c)15,000
3What is the approximate comorbidity rate according to the CDC?
a) 88%, b) 93%, c) 95%
4What is the minimum percent of reported vaccine deaths according to VAERS database?
a) 1%, b) 3%, c) 5%
5Covid Vaccine deaths exceed the total number of deaths from all vaccines in the past
a) year, b)10 years, c) 20 years
6Current reported VAERS deaths?
a) 5,000, b)12,000, c)15,000
7Current estimated VAERS deaths?
a) 30,000, b) 45,000, c) 55,000
8How many times did Fauci flip on masks?
a) 2, b) 3, c) 4
9What is the estimated Covid mortality rate?
a) 1.0%, b) 0.5%, c) 0.3%
10What is the estimated Covid mortality rate for <18 year old?
a) 0.3%, b) 0.1%, c) 0.001%
11Sweden Covid death rate?
a) .001%, b) 0.0001%, c) zero
12How many flu deaths reported in 2020-21?
a) 50,000, b) 25,000, c) virtually ZERO
13Why has HCQ not been promoted by the FDA/MSM?
a) dangerous drug, b) no historical track record, c) no income for Big Pharma
 
1 Comment

Posted by on July 27, 2021 in Uncategorized

 

VAERS VACCINE DATA ADVERSE EVENTS AS OF JULY 2, 2021

LINKS TO  BLOG POSTS

From:OpenVAERSAlert.com

“The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) was established in 1990 as an early warning system to detect possible safety problems in U.S.-licensed vaccines. Reporting is voluntary and this leads to significant undercounting of harms. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care conducted a study for U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that concluded that “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.

”1 This week’s new numbers are horrifying. 2,063 new deaths were added making it the deadliest week ever recorded by VAERS. There are now 9,048 reports of fatalities following these shots in the last 7 months and we know that this is just a fraction of the real total. This is the most catastrophic vaccine campaign in U.S. history. The coronavirus vaccine campaign has killed more Americans than all other vaccines combined over the last 30 years. The data show that these products must be pulled from the market immediately. To put this in perspective, the 1976 swine flu vaccine campaign was halted after 25 deaths and 500 cases of Guillain-Barre Syndrome out of 40 million doses administered.

2 Why are public health officials today so callous about levels of death and injury that are hundreds of times worse than the 1976 vaccine campaign? How many coronavirus vaccine deaths is too many for you? What will it take for you to say “Enough!” We are asking you to use your voice to stop this disastrous medical experiment”.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on July 15, 2021 in Uncategorized

 

Democrat Operatives in Michigan and Georgia Tampered with Military Ballots — Filled Out New Ones 100% MARKED FOR JOE BIDEN

Richard Charnin May 25, 2021

LINKS TO  BLOG POSTS

“The Michigan Senate Oversight Committee on Tuesday held a hearing in Lansing on election fraud and irregularities.

President Trump was ahead of Joe Biden in Michigan on election night when all of a sudden they stopped counting votes.

At around 4:30 AM AFTER Election Day, a massive ballot dump of more than 130,000 votes appeared for Joe Biden in Michigan.

One GOP elections observer on Tuesday said all of the military ballots she saw looked like “Xerox copies” of each other – none were registered Michigan voters and 100% went for Joe Biden”.

—–


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/pure-evil-democrat-operatives-michigan-georgia-tampered-military-ballots-filled-new-ones-100-marked-joe-biden/

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on May 25, 2021 in Uncategorized

 

The Democrats and the Media does not want to allow the 2020 Election Audit in Maricopa County, AZ.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on April 23, 2021 in Uncategorized

 

CDC: Side-effects of Wearing a Mask

Richard Charnin

4/21/21

LINKS TO  BLOG POSTS

An article published by the CDC in June 2020 states side-effects of wearing a mask, specifically trapping carbon dioxide or CO2. The article states that the masks cause breathing resistance which could result in a reduction in the frequency and depth of breathing, known as hypoventilation, in as little as an hour of wearing a mask.

The article further went onto elaborate of the side-effects of increased CO2 concentrations in the mask wearer that include:

1 Headache

2 Increased pressure inside the skull

3 Nervous system changes

4 increased pain threshold

5 reduction in cognition

6 altered judgement

7 decreased situational awareness

8 difficulty coordinating sensory or cognitive abilities and motor activity

9 decreased visual acuity

10 widespread activation of the sympathetic nervous system that can oppose the direct effects of CO2 on the heart and blood vessels

11 Increased breathing frequency

12 Increased “work of breathing”, which is a result of breathing through a filter medium

13 Cardiovascular effects (e.g., diminished cardiac contractility, vasodilation of peripheral blood vessels)

14 Reduced tolerance to lighter workloads.

Rand Paul Criticizes Dr. Fauci Over Mask Mandate; Newly Uncovered CDC Document Shows Adverse Effects

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on April 21, 2021 in Uncategorized

 

NY Times: PA and GA vote timelines show Trump losing votes. How do votes disappear?

Richard Charnin Feb.5, 2021

LINKS TO  BLOG POSTS

How do votes disappear? The NY Times PA data timeline shows Trump losing votes. But the Times says do not believe your lying eyes; there was no election fraud. A statistical analysis of New York Times data in Philadelphia claims a suspicious string of voting “ratios” benefiting Biden, as also happened in Georgia.

By 11pm Election Day, Trump was leading Biden by about 285,000 votes. Then, 347,768 votes from somewhere dumped into the system in 44 batches in increments of approximately 6,000, 12,000, or 18,000 additional net votes for Biden. As a result, Biden came back from an election night deficit of 285,000 to a 46,000 vote win four days later. https://centralcitynews.us/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Central-City-News-11-19-20-Small.pdf

The NY Times GA data timeline also shows Trump losing votes. But the Times says do not believe your lying eyes; there was no election fraud. Statistical analysis shows Biden pulling from behind in improbably consistent increments in Georgia and other states.

“On Wednesday, Nov. 4, the New York Times reported President Trump was leading in Georgia by 103,997 votes. Then the Times’ continuous voting updates showed ballots arriving for Biden in multiples of 4,800 votes over and over again. In some vote dumps, the President actually lost votes.” This continued until Biden pulled ahead by almost exactly 1,000 votes, gaining 104,984 votes in multiples of 4,800.

https://sharylattkisson.com/2020/12/what-youve-been-asking-for-a-fairly-complete-list-of-some-of-the-most-significant-claims-of-2020-election-miscounts-errors-or-fraud/

 
4 Comments

Posted by on February 5, 2021 in Uncategorized

 

Trump 2020: 25 scenarios

Richard Charnin – Jan. 27, 2021

LINKS TO  BLOG POSTS

(based on estimated turnout and vote shares)

Trump range: Share 52.6% to 56.8%; Votes: 83.3m to 90.0m; margin: 11.7m to 25.1m

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yh0YkXBVctdJwt0_XHrpCC6f7K30oEz0Vr13MiU5qT4/edit#gid=297739797

DemRepInd
Gallup ID31.0%31.0%38.0%
Trump %12.0%96.0%57.0%
Turnout94%98%96%
Base caseBidenTrump
Vote share41.6%56.2%
Votes65.989.0
% Dem
10.0%11.0%12.0%13.0%14.0%
% IndTrump
57%55.6%55.9%56.2%56.5%56.8%
55%54.9%55.2%55.5%55.8%56.1%
53%54.1%54.4%54.7%55.0%55.3%
51%53.4%53.6%53.9%54.2%54.5%
49%52.6%52.9%53.2%53.5%53.8%
Votes
57%88.188.689.089.590.0
55%86.987.487.888.388.8
53%85.786.286.687.187.6
51%84.585.085.485.986.4
49%83.383.884.284.785.2
Margin
57%21.322.323.224.125.1
55%18.919.820.821.722.7
53%16.517.418.419.320.3
51%14.115.016.016.917.9
49%11.712.613.614.515.5
 
17 Comments

Posted by on January 27, 2021 in Uncategorized

 

Navarro Report Volume 3: Yes, President Trump WON – The Case, Evidence, & Statistical Receipts

Richard Charnin Jan. 15, 2020

LINKS TO  BLOG POSTS

This third installment of Navarro’s report provides investigators with up-to-date statistical “receipts” and a well-documented tally of potentially illegal votes on a state-by-state and category-by-category basis. Source: NavarroReport.com:

Volume 3 provides a scholarly rendering of the potential number of illegal votes in the 2020 election. Peter Navarro welcomes anyone who wishes to dispute its findings “because that is the nature of scholarly discourse.”

Note: The above table does not include 1) estimated 2.5% machine vote flipping from Trump to Biden, 2) Dr. Epstein’s estimate that 6-10% of Trump voters flipped to Biden from the propaganda effect of Google algorithms which favored Biden, and 3) a survey which found that 7% of Biden voters would have voted for Trump if they knew about the Biden scandals.

Model 1: cell A95 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yh0YkXBVctdJwt0_XHrpCC6f7K30oEz0Vr13MiU5qT4/edit#gid=297739797

Model 2: cell M8 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yh0YkXBVctdJwt0_XHrpCC6f7K30oEz0Vr13MiU5qT4/edit#gid=376710386

Illegal voters, Biden margin, Trump margin – Election models 1&2

AZGAMINVPAWI
Illegal votes255601447220992554
Biden margin1012155348221
Trump Model 1490751563217812405
Trump Model 25928798552201,164566
 
14 Comments

Posted by on January 15, 2021 in Uncategorized

 

Senate runoff: What is the probability of a 150,000 vote spike for the Dems 10 minutes after stopping the count?

Richard Charnin Jan.6, 2021

LINKS TO  BLOG POSTS

The corrupt MSM, Dems and Repubs will say they don’t see anything suspicious in the graph and that we should not believe our lying eyes. What is the probability of a 150,000 vote spike for the Dems 10 minutes after stopping the count? Looks like the PA election late night vote dump, but on a smaller scale.

Attention Dominion and ES&S; Sue me please. I volunteer to be sued!

 
4 Comments

Posted by on January 6, 2021 in Uncategorized

 

A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID- 19

Richard Charnin – Jan. 3, 2021

LINKS TO  BLOG POSTS

Deaths from other causes are included in the COVID-19 total…

“When Briand looked at the 2020 data during that seasonal period, COVID-19-related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases. This was highly unusual since heart disease has always prevailed as the leading cause of deaths. However, when taking a closer look at the death numbers, she noted something strange.

As Briand compared the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018, she noticed that instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes, there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease. Even more surprising, as seen in the graph below, this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all other causes.

This trend is completely contrary to the pattern observed in all previous years. Interestingly, as depicted in the table below, the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19. This suggests, according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19″ . https://archive.is/DJdin

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 3, 2021 in Uncategorized

 

The Electoral vs. Popular vote Myth

Richard Charnin – Jan.3, 2021

LINKS TO  BLOG POSTS

The conventional wisdom is that a presidential candidate could win the popular vote and lose the electoral vote – or vice versa. This is extremely unlikely in a fair election; there is virtually a 100% probability that the winner of the popular vote would win the electoral vote. But all elections are fraudulent to some extent.

The Democrats want to get rid of the electoral college and replace it with the winner of the popular vote, thinking this would help them win elections in the future. But this is based on the  premise that they can more easily win or steal the popular vote, like they  have done in the last two elections. Consider the 2000, 2004, 2016 and 2020 elections, all of which were fraudulent.

Bush stole the 2000 election. He won the Electoral vote by 271-267.  Gore won the recorded popular vote by 540,000 and the true vote by at least 5 million. He led the unadjusted exit polls in 11 states but lost them all in the vote. If he had won just one, he would have won the election.

Bush stole the 2004 election. He won the bogus recorded popular vote by 3 million and the electoral vote by 286-252.. But Kerry won the true popular vote and the unadjusted exit polls by at least 7 million. He  had approximately 349 electoral votes.

Clinton tried to steal the 2016 election. She won the bogus recorded vote by 3 million. But Trump won the electoral vote by 306-232 as well as the true popular vote.

Biden stole the 2020 election, the most fraudulent in history. He won the bogus recorded vote by 7 million and the electoral vote 306-232. But Trump won the true popular vote by 15-18 million with 356-393 electoral votes.

2020 Recorded Vote: Biden 51.3-46.9%, 306-232 EV; True Vote Model: Trump 55.1-42.7%, 393 EV https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yh0YkXBVctdJwt0_XHrpCC6f7K30oEz0Vr13MiU5qT4/edit#gid=297739797

2016 Recorded Vote: Clinton 48.3-46.2%, Trump 306-232 EV; True Vote Model: Trump 47.5-46.1%, 354-184 EV https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2016/11/07/2016-election-model-forecast/ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sGxtIofohrj3POpwq-85Id2_fYKgvgoWbPZacZw0XlY/edit#gid=1739803045

2004 Recorded Vote: Bush 50.7- 48.3%, Bush 286-252 EV; True Vote Model: Kerry 53.6-45.1%, 364 EV; Unadjusted National Exit Poll: Kerry 51.7-47.0%; Unadjusted State Exit Polls: Kerry 51.1-47.6%, 349 EV https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/the-final-2004-national-exit-poll-switched-7-2-of-kerry-responders-to-bush/ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjAk1JUWDMyRdGN3WEZNTUFaR0tfOHVXTzA1VGRsdHc#gid=0

2000 Recorded Vote: Gore 48.4-Bush 47.9%, Bush 271- 267 EV; True Vote Model: Gore 51.5-44.7%, 404 EV; Unadjusted National Exit Poll: Gore 48.5-46.3%; Unadjusted State Exit Polls aggregate: Gore 50.8-44.4% https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2011/11/21/unadjusted-state-exit-polls-indicate-that-al-gore-won-a-mini-landslide-in-2000/ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjAk1JUWDMyRdFIzSTJtMTJZekNBWUdtbWp3bHlpWGc#gid=4

 
11 Comments

Posted by on January 3, 2021 in Uncategorized

 

2020 Election Model Update: 1/1/2021

Richard Charnin – Jan.1, 2021

LINKS TO  BLOG POSTS

2020 Election Model. View 10 pre-election polls and recorded state votes, party-ID, model popular votes, shares and electoral votes.

1) National Model input data/calculations in row 5, 2) 25 Trump vote share scenarios in row 35, 3) Model output in row 95.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yh0YkXBVctdJwt0_XHrpCC6f7K30oEz0Vr13MiU5qT4/edit#gid=297739797

Consider two model scenarios:

1) Trump: 96% of Repubs, 12% of Dems and 57% of Independents. He has 393 EV, 54.6%, 14.7m vote margin.

2) Trump: 96% of Repubs, 10% of Dems and 55% of Independents. He has 389 EV, 53.4%, 11.4m vote margin.

Note: Equal voter turnout is assumed. This is conservative. Republicans turn out at higher rates than Democrats. Therefore, we can assume Trump did better than the results below indicate.

Scenario 1Gallup
TurnoutParty-IDBidenTrumpOther
Dem60.242.4%87.0%12.0%1.0%
Rep60.442.5%4.0%96.0%0.0%
Ind21.415.1%38.0%57.0%5.0%
National Model100.0%44.3%54.5%1.2%
Votes142.063.077.41.6
Margin/EV14.4145393
State Model100.0%44.2%54.6%1.2%
Votes142.062.877.51.7
Margin/EV14.7145393
Recorded12/1351.3%46.9%1.8%
Votes158.3881.374.22.9
Margin/EV-7.1306232
Scenario 2Party-IDBidenTrumpOther
Dem60.242.4%89.0%10.0%1.0%
Rep60.442.5%4.0%96.0%0.0%
Ind21.415.1%40.0%55.0%5.0%
National Model100.0%45.5%53.3%1.2%
Votes142.0m64.675.71.7
Margin/EV11.2m149389
State Model100.0%45.4%53.4%1.2%
Votes142.064.475.91.7
Margin/EV11.4m149389
Recorded51.3%46.9%1.8%
Votes158.4m81.374.22.9
Margin/EV-7.1m306232

SensitivityAnalysis

%Dem10.0%Trump %Rep
Trump88.0%90.0%92.0%94.0%96.0%
% IndTrump
55%49.9%50.8%51.6%52.5%53.3%
53%49.6%50.5%51.3%52.2%53.0%
51%49.3%50.2%51.0%51.9%52.7%
49%49.0%49.9%50.7%51.6%52.4%
47%48.7%49.6%50.4%51.3%52.1%
Biden
55%48.9%48.0%47.2%46.3%45.5%
53%49.2%48.3%47.5%46.6%45.8%
51%49.5%48.6%47.8%46.9%46.1%
49%49.8%48.9%48.1%47.2%46.4%
47%50.1%49.2%48.4%47.5%46.7%
Margin
55%1.1%2.8%4.5%6.2%7.9%
53%0.5%2.2%3.9%5.6%7.3%
51%-0.1%1.6%3.3%5.0%6.7%
49%-0.7%1.0%2.7%4.4%6.1%
47%-1.4%0.4%2.1%3.8%5.5%
Margin
55%1.53.96.38.811.2
53%0.73.15.57.910.3
51%-0.22.24.67.09.5
49%-1.11.43.86.28.6
47%-1.90.52.95.37.7
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 1, 2021 in Uncategorized

 

2020 National Exit Poll: How did you vote in 2016, Party-ID, Sensitivity analysis of alternate vote share assumptions

Richard Charnin – Dec. 5, 2020

LINKS TO  BLOG POSTS

We are constantly fed propaganda by the media and politicians that Clinton won the popular vote by 2.8 million. But the NEP How Voted 2016 demographic indicates that 43% voted for Trump and 40% for Clinton. Trump had a much bigger margin in 2020 than he did in 2016. Election fraud in 2020 is massive. Biden won the bogus reported vote by 80.7-74.6 million (51.0-47.1%). But Trump won the election in a landslide. This should be obvious to anyone who looks at the overwhelming evidence of fraud. The 2020 National Exit Poll (NEP) forced a match to the fraudulent reported vote. The focus is on two demographics: returning 2016 voters and party affiliation.

In the 2016-1 analysis, the 2016 reported vote (Clinton by 48.2-46.1%) is assumed as the basis for voter turnout in 2020. Trump wins by 6.1 million votes (50.6-48.4%). In 2016-2, returning voters are based on the 2020 NEP (Trump by 43-40%). Trump wins by 12.0 million votes (53.2-44.8%). In both cases, equal turnout rates of Trump and Clinton voters is assumed. This is conservative. Historically, Republicans turn out at higher rates than Democrats.

2020 NEP MixBidenTrumpOther
Clinton40%95%4%1%
Trump43%7%92%1%
Other5%60%25%15%
DNV (new)12%58%39%3%
Calculated100.0%51.0%47.1%1.9%
Vote (mil)158.3882.0875.131.17
Margin6.95
Recorded100.0%51.3%46.9%1.8%
Vote 158.3881.2774.222.90
2016-1 MixBidenTrumpOther
Clinton44.4%90%7%3%
Trump42.5%2%96%2%
Other5.2%37%55%8%
DNV (new)7.9%48%52%0%
Calculated100.0%46.5%50.9%2.6%
Vote (mil)142.066.172.23.7
Margin6.1
2016-2MixBidenTrumpOther
Clinton38.8%90%8%2%
Trump41.4%2%96%2%
Other4.2%37%55%8%
DNV (new)15.6%48%52%0%
Calculated100.0%44.8%53.2%1.9%
Vote (mil)142.063.675.62.8
Margin12.0

2020 NEP
Voted 2016ClintonTrumpOtherDNV
National40%43%5%12%
FL38%44%5%13%
PA41%44%4%11%
OH36%46%5%13%
GA38%40%5%17%
MN39%41%8%12%
WI39%42%7%12%
MI40%42%4%14%
AVG38.7%42.7%5.4%13.1%

In the Sensitivity analysis of 25 scenarios: Trump has 92-96% share of returning Trump voters and 6-10% of Clinton voters. His vote margins range from 5.1 (worst case) to 14.2 million (best case).

Trump %
Other 55%
DNV 52%%Clinton
6%7%8%9%10%
% TrumpTrump
96%52.5%52.9%53.2%53.6%54.0%
95%52.1%52.4%52.8%53.2%53.6%
94%51.6%52.0%52.4%52.8%53.2%
93%51.2%51.6%52.0%52.4%52.8%
92%50.8%51.2%51.6%52.0%52.4%
Biden
96%45.6%45.2%44.8%44.4%44.0%
95%46.0%45.6%45.2%44.8%44.5%
94%46.4%46.0%45.6%45.3%44.9%
93%46.8%46.4%46.1%45.7%45.3%
92%47.2%46.9%46.5%46.1%45.7%
Margin
96%6.9%7.6%8.4%9.2%10.0%
95%6.0%6.8%7.6%8.4%9.1%
94%5.2%6.0%6.8%7.5%8.3%
93%4.4%5.2%5.9%6.7%7.5%
92%3.6%4.3%5.1%5.9%6.7%
Margin
96%9.810.912.013.114.2
95%8.69.710.811.913.0
94%7.48.59.610.711.8
93%6.27.38.49.510.6
92%5.16.27.38.49.5

In the Party-ID demographic, Democrats comprised 37% and Republicans 36%. Biden won 94% of Democrats and 6% of Republicans, Trump won 94% of Republicans and just 5% of Democrats. But Biden led Independents by 54-41%, giving him a 7.5 million vote margin (51.5-46.8%). In the adjusted calculation, I use the latest Gallup voter affiliation weights (31D-31R-28I) and estimate that Trump had 52% of Independents and won by 6.8 million votes (50.6-47.1%).

View the spreadsheet calculations. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yh0YkXBVctdJwt0_XHrpCC6f7K30oEz0Vr13MiU5qT4/edit#gid=0

The National Exit Poll: https://www.cnn.com/election/2020/exit-polls/president/national-results

This article from Paul Craig Roberts, an eminent historian, spells it all out.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 5, 2020 in Uncategorized

 

David Ray Griffin: 9/11 truther

David Ray Griffin: The most prolific 9/11 truth teller has written at least 10 books on 9/11.. https://www.thriftbooks.com/a/david-ray-griffin/204510/

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 11, 2021 in Uncategorized

 

2020 Election Unmasked

LINKS TO  BLOG POSTS

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on May 24, 2021 in Uncategorized

 

PhD Dr. Douglas Frank: The identical computer algorithm was applied in every state to steal the 2020 election

LINKS TO  BLOG POSTS

Dr. Douglas Frank holds a Ph.D in Surface Analytical Chemistry for the University of Cincinnati. Dr. Frank is an internationally recognized scientist with over fifty scientific publications.

Expert Reveals That the Same Computer Algorithm Was Applied in Every State to Steal the 2020 Election

WHAT DR. FRANK DISCOVERED ABOUT NOV. 2020 ELECTIONS

Dr. Frank has spent countless hours since the 2020 elections following the data of the election returns county by county across such states as Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Colorado to name a few.

Dr. Frank’s scientific and mathematical investigation has revealed that there was absolutely massive cyber fraud in the 2020 elections.

Dr. Frank’s investigation reveals that the 2010 national census data was used to pre-set the algorithms in the voting machines.  This in turn manipulated the 2020 election rolls by injecting phantom votes into the election totals.

His scientific investigation documented and proved that numerous states throughout America had more people voting than lived in many of the counties.

By using the 2010 census, the cheaters [China, Iran, the Biden campaign, the Democrats?] who pre-set the algorithm “keys” produced votes for voters who had passed away or who no longer lived in the county or state.

In numerous documented cases, voters showed up to vote at their precinct only to be told they had already voted, when in fact, they had not voted.

What is now being revealed by the scientific investigation of Dr. Frank is that these Americans had their votes cast for them through a highly sophisticated computer program.

This fraud did not occur in just a few precincts, counties, or swing states but occurred on a national basis as shown by Dr. Frank’s statistics and charts.  

Dr. Frank also reveals that even in the states President Trump won, the President won those states by larger numbers than was reported.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on May 16, 2021 in Uncategorized