RSS

Clinton rigged the primary against Sanders, and then she rigged the presidential.

Richard Charnin
June 23, 2018

Clinton rigged the primary against Sanders, and then she rigged the presidential. The MSM was in the tank for HRC. Pre-election and unadjusted exit polls which showed Clinton winning were bogus in the presidential election.

http://projectcensored.org/clintonistasdnc-illegally-stole…/

https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2018/04/05/23743/

“Finally, almost all election ballots are counted by computers and cannot be verified by the public. Apart from being non-transparent, this method of counting ballots is also problematic because electronic voting machines can easily be hacked. Essentially, Clintonista computer hackers could have flipped a minimum number of votes spread over a maximum number of polling stations by inserting a malicious code or algorithm into the voting tabulation software. As a result, this code would allow the final number of votes to “remain random in a way that would avoid detection by election fraud analysis tools.” Suspiciously, multiple studies show that across all primary states, Clinton performed best in counties with electronic voting machines that didn’t leave a paper trail.

Additionally, Election Justice USA found that the computer counts differed widely from the exit poll projections, but only for the Democratic Party primaries. According to election analyst Richard Charnin, Bernie Sanders’ exit poll share exceeded his recorded vote share by greater than the margin of error in 11 of 26 primaries: Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Massachusetts, New York, Ohio, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, Wisconsin, and West Virginia. Charnin reported that the probability of this occurring is 1 in 77 billion, which raises the strong possibility of election fraud. Yet, almost no discrepancies were found in the data for the Republican Party primaries. This is particularly remarkable, because the exit polls were conducted on the same day, in the same precincts, with the same interviewers, and used the same methodologies for both the parties. So, this evidence suggests that the computer counts were only accurate for the Republican Party, while the computer counts for the Democratic Party primaries remain largely unverified.

The exit polls for the Democratic primaries were conducted by Edison Research, which is the exclusive provider of exit polls to the National Election Pool (NEP), which includes ABC, CBS, CNN, FOX, NBC and the Associated Press. The National Election Pool has a policy that exit pollsters must adjust and force all state and national exit polls to match the recorded vote count, as if the computerized votes are always correct and as if there is no fraud!”

 

My Books
Trump Won the True Vote: Polling Anomalies, Democratic Defections, Independents and Late Undecided Voters
77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Exit Poll
Reclaiming Science: The JFK Conspiracy

 

Advertisements
 
 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

The myth: HRC/FBI/DOJ/Deep State thought Clinton would win easily

Richard Charnin
May 1, 2018

It is established fact: HRC stole the primary from Bernie Sanders. Her approval ratings were 10% lower than Sanders. On the other hand, Trump won the GOP primary easily. Hillary knew she would lose to Trump in a fair election, so she also needed to rig the general.
http://projectcensored.org/clintonistasdnc-illegally-stole-democratic-primaries-bernie-sanders/

She tried to steal the election (rigged voting machines, illegals, dead voters). But Trump had too big a lead. The myth that Clinton won the popular vote by nearly 3 million is parroted daily by pundits, even Trump supporters. Clinton won a fraudulent recorded popular vote, but Trump won the True Vote. It’s 2018 and the pundits still fail to recognize the historical fact that the recorded vote is never the same as the True Vote. It’s past time for a great awakening.
https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2018/04/05/23743/

The MSM inflated Clinton’s pre-election polls to set the stage.
https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2017/09/15/2016-pre-election-polls-in-16-battleground-states-were-biased-for-clinton/

Democrats were over-weighted, Independents underweighted.
https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2016/11/07/2016-election-model-forecast/

The HRC approval polls were the lowest of any presidential candidate.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1R9Y3ae2uyW8SUxVUnnOt9ZyvheAxa0fAhesAw_nhciM/edit#gid=34911100

HRC internal polls probably showed her losing.Trump internal polls probably showed him winning. He warned about a rigged election in the debates and said he might contest if he lost. Clinton ridiculed Trump for bringing up election fraud. She said we must trust the final result while cheating in the debates (Donna Brazile).

Sanders voters defected to Trump and Jill Stein or did not vote.
Trump had the momentum after Sept.1. He won late deciders easily.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1R9Y3ae2uyW8SUxVUnnOt9ZyvheAxa0fAhesAw_nhciM/edit#gid=793126276

The Democratic base was shattered.
Clinton joined Stein in recounts of states Trump won.
But they did not call for recounts in states Trump lost. https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2016/12/01/the-2016-presidential-recounts-why-not-add-these-six-states/

HRC paid for the phony Pissgate Dossier. FBI/DOJ/MSM was panicking.
HRC needed a dramatic turnaround.
She had to derail Trump with Russiagate.
She claimed Russia hacked the DNC for Wikileaks.

The DNC used Crowdstrike to examine the server, that was ok with the FBI.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-24/what-crowdstrike-firm-hired-dnc-has-ties-hillary-clinton-ukrainian-billionaire-and-g
But it was a Seth Rich leak, not a hack. William Binney and VIPS proved it.
https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2017/01/31/russian-tampering-with-the-election/

Post-election Insurance Policy – destroy Trump with Russiagate.
Mueller investigation: NO COLLUSION.
Bogus DNC suit vs. Wikileaks, Trump, Russia

My Books
Trump Won the True Vote: Polling Anomalies, Democratic Defections, Independents and Late Undecided Voters
77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Exit Poll
Reclaiming Science: The JFK Conspiracy

 

 
 

Exposing the 2016 Popular Vote Myth

Exposing the 2016 Popular Vote Myth

Richard Charnin
April 5, 2018

The myth that Clinton won the popular vote by nearly 3 million is parroted daily by pundits, even Trump supporters. Clinton won a fraudulent recorded popular vote, but Trump won the True Vote. It’s 2018 and the pundits still fail to recognize the historical fact that the recorded vote is never the same as the True Vote.  It’s past time for a great awakening.

Trump wins the True Vote by 50.5-43.4%, a 9.7 million vote margin.

We estimate the True Vote based on the following simple models:

  • 1 Adjustments to the recorded vote: illegal votes , disenfranchised voters, voting machine flips
  • 2 Race: Census breakdown and shares of white and non-white voters
  • 3 Returning 2012 voters and 2016 vote shares
  • 4 Party-ID: Gallup voter survey and vote shares
  • 5 Decided: Vote shares before and after Sept. 1

Given Model 1 adjustments to the recorded vote, we calculate an estimated True Vote. In models 2,3,4,5 we estimate vote shares required to match the True Vote.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1R9Y3ae2uyW8SUxVUnnOt9ZyvheAxa0fAhesAw_nhciM/edit#gid=1672204415

http://www.cnn.com/election/results/exit-polls/national/president

 Adjustment Estimate Clinton Trump Other
Illegal 3.0 mil 85% 10% 5%
Disenfran 4.0 mil 85% 10% 5%
Net Vote Flip 7.0 mil 0% 90% 10%
Total Clinton Trump Other Margin
Recorded  136.22 65.72 62.89 7.61 2.83
Adjustment 48.25% 46.17% 5.59% 2.08%
Illegal -3.0 -2.55 -0.30 -0.15 -2.25
Disenfran 4.0 3.40 0.40 0.20 3.00
Vote Flip 0.0 -7.00 6.30 0.70 -13.30
True Vote 137.22 59.57 69.29 8.36 9.72
43.41% 50.50% 6.09% 7.08%
Census Pct Clinton Trump Other
white (adj.) 73.30% 32.4% 61.14% 6.5%
Black 12.45% 84% 13% 3%
Latino 9.22% 66% 28% 6%
Asian 3.67% 65% 27% 8%
Other 1.36% 56% 36% 8%
Calc 100.00% 43.41% 50.50% 6.09%
Recorded 100% 48.25% 46.17% 5.59%
Gallup
Party-ID Pct Clinton Trump Other
Dem 31.0% 88.0% 10.0% 2.0%
Rep 28.0% 5.0% 92.0% 3.0%
Ind 41.0% 36.0% 53.0% 11.0%
Total 100.0% 43.44% 50.59% 5.97%
Votes 137.22 59.61 69.42 8.19
2012 Mix Clinton Trump Other
Obama 41.33% 85% 10% 5%
Romney 40.80% 5% 92% 3%
Other 1.54% 35% 40% 25%
DNV (new) 16.32% 35% 51% 14%
Total 100.0% 43.43% 50.61% 5.96%
Votes 137.22 59.59 69.45 8.18
Decided Pct Clinton Trump Other
Before Sept 1 60.0% 48% 48% 4.0%
After Sept 1 40.0% 37% 54% 9.2%
True Vote   43.41% 50.50% 6.09%

Sensitivity Analysis

7 million vote flip  Trump Flip    
 to Clinton 80%= 5.6mm 90%= 6.3mm 100%=7mm
 Disenfranchised  
Trump True Vote
6.0 68.79 69.49 70.19
4.0 68.59 69.29 69.99
2.0 68.39 69.09 69.79
Trump
6.0 50.1% 50.6% 51.2%
4.0 50.0% 50.50% 51.0%
2.0 49.8% 50.4% 50.9%
Clinton
6.0 43.8% 43.3% 42.8%
4.0 43.9% 43.41% 42.9%
2.0 44.1% 43.6% 43.0%
Margin
6.0 8.72 10.12 11.52
4.0 8.32 9.72 11.12
2.0 7.92 9.32 10.72

My Books
Trump Won the True Vote
77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Poll
Reclaiming Science: The JFK Conspiracy
LINKS TO  POSTS

 
 

Tags: , , ,

2004 Election Fraud: Mathematical Confirmation of a Kerry Landslide

Richard Charnin

This is a book of my posts from 2005 when election fraud was dismissed as just another conspiracy theory.

Introduction: To Believe Bush Won…

  1.  When Decided
  2.  Bush Approval Ratings
  3.  The Final 5 Million Recorded Votes
  4.  The Final Exit Poll: Forced to Match the Vote
  5.  Within Precinct Discrepancy
  6.  New Voters
  7.  Party ID
  8.  Gender
  9.  Implausible Gore Voter Defection
  10. Voter Turnout
  11. Urban Legend
  12. Location Size
  13. Sensitivity Analysis
  14. Did Kerry Win 360 EV?
  15. Election Simulation Analysis
  16. Exit Poll Response Optimization
  17. Florida
  18. Ohio
  19. New York

 

Appendix

  1. Election Model: Nov.1 Projection
  2. Interactive Monte Carlo Simulation: Pre-election and Exit Polls
  3. 1988-2004 Election Calculator: The True Vote
  4. The 2000-2004 County Vote Database
  5. Statistics and Probability: Mathematics of Polling

         

 
1 Comment

Posted by on March 21, 2018 in 2004 Election

 

Tags: , , , ,

DID TRUMP ACTUALLY WIN BY 13 MILLION VOTES?

DID TRUMP ACTUALLY WIN BY 13 MILLION VOTES?

 

The left used the popular vote as an argument to de-legitimize Trump’s presidency. They  followed it up with the Russian investigation. “This is how they deceived the public”.

NSA contributed to this report which is still not a finished product. It indicates that Hillary flipped 7 million of Trump’s votes on voting machines. There is no way of vetting this intel; the future will prove if it is true.  The 13 million true vote margin would have put the ‘Hillary Clinton should be president” argument to rest.

The “Popular Vote” lie  allowed the “RussiaGate” lie to take place.  It planted doubt in  voters minds and enabled the false narrative that Clinton won the popular vote by 2.8 million. It helped introduce the media myth that Russian meddling won the election for  Trump.

The reality was that Hillary Clinton was widely hated; she got dominated in the popular vote and the electoral college. There is no Russia Scandal. How many months did the media run with “Hillary got the popular vote”? The fraud WILL be made public.

Dilley received more information about voter fraud, including the Democrat victory in Alabama  on January 31. ‘DHS’ is Department of Homeland Security: The  fraud will be exposed AFTER memo bombshells.“They have an independent review ongoing on top of their own review“ “It’s a precursor to Voter ID Laws pushed from POTUS on the back of HUGE evidence of fraud”. Dilley knows who’s doing the independent review. “It’s TOP TIER”.

Dilley speculates on Alabama: They’re building a case as a way to make sense of what happened nationwide in the general. https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2017/12/14/2017-alabama-true-vote-75-turnout-of-of-clinton-voters-but-only-45-of-trump-voters/

The following adjustments to the recorded vote match the 13 million true vote margin (Trump wins by 51.8-42.4%):

………………….. Clinton…..Trump……Other
Vote… 136.22…65.72…….62.89………7.61
…………………. 48.25%….46.17%…….5.59%
Adjustments (millions)
Illegal….. -3.0…..-3.00……. 0.00……… 0.00
Disenfran 3.0……2.55……. 0.36……… 0.09
Vote Flip. 0.0….. -7.50……. 7.28……… 0.23
True Vote 136.22 57.77…. 70.52…….. 7.92
…………………. 42.41%.. 51.77% ….5.82%
Sensitivity Analysis
Trump Vote Flip to Clinton
……. 6.28… 7.28…. 8.28
Disen Trum Vote
4.0.. 69.64.. 70.64.. 71.64
3.0.. 69.52.. 70.52.. 71.52
2.0.. 69.40.. 70.40.. 71.40
Trump
4.0.. 51.13% 51.86% 52.60%
3.0.. 51.04% 51.77% 52.51%
2.0.. 50.95% 51.69% 52.42%
Clinton
4.0.. 43.06% 42.32% 41.59%
3.0.. 43.14% 42.41% 41.68%
2.0.. 43.23% 42.50% 41.76%
Margin
4.0.. 11.00…. 13.00…. 15.00
3.0.. 10.76…. 12.76…. 14.76
2.0.. 10.52…. 12.52…. 14.52
 
6 Comments

Posted by on February 13, 2018 in 2016 election

 

Tags: ,

Vote rigging Wikileaks email deleted?

Richard Charnin
Jan. 28, 2018

My Books
Trump Won the True Vote
77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Poll
Reclaiming Science: The JFK Conspiracy
LINKS TO  POSTS

Some have claimed that the following E-mail is a fake since it does not exist in the Wikileaks database. They do not consider that it may have been deleted. But the NSA has them all.

“Jan 21 2018 22:20:15
Anonymous
ID: c4d817
120926
GUYS- email was sent out by NSA before election with some plausible deniability attached to it so people could say “FAKE”! HOWEVER, the main audience wasn’t normies, it was the black hats, a shot across the bow to say “WE HAVE IT ALL, YOUR’E RIGGING WON’T WORK”. Q just brought it back up to speak directly to “THEM” again to show they are going to dump it all.”

https://www.theepochtimes.com/voting-machines-in-16-states-tied-to-george-soros-ally_2176907.html

 

 
1 Comment

Posted by on January 28, 2018 in 2016 election

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

2017 Alabama Senate: Jefferson County- Implausible voter turnout

Alabama Senate: Jefferson County- Implausible voter turnout

Richard Charnin
Jan. 12, 2018

My Books
Trump Won the True Vote
77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Poll
Reclaiming Science: The JFK Conspiracy
LINKS TO  POSTS

Problem: Estimate a) Clinton and Trump voter turnout in 2017 and b) Trump voter defection required to match the recorded vote.

In 2016, Clinton won Jefferson by 32,000 votes (52.3-45.0%).
In 2017, Jones won Jefferson by 83,000 votes (68.1-30.2%).

In order to match the vote, Jones needed
1) 25% higher 2016 Clinton voter turnout than Trump (85-60%).
2) 21% of returning Trump voters (8% would normally be expected to defect).
3) 98% of Clinton voters.

True Vote Estimate: Assume 80% turnout of Clinton voters and 66% of Trump  voters. Moore wins 84% of Trump voters and 3% of Clinton.   Jones’ margin in Jefferson is reduced from 83,000 to 56,000 votes.

Go to row 133
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1YoXVkz6KGUoMzEDJBxwROEaukSkgqWVHX3qy_lBxIgc/edit#gid=0

Recorded Vote-Turnout Assumption: 85% Clinton; 60% Trump;60% Other

JEFFERSON COUNTY
2017
2016 Recorded Votes 99% Alive Turnout Turnout
Clinton 52.32% 156,873 155,304 85% 132,009
Trump 44.95% 134,768 133,420 60% 80,052
Other 2.73% 8,199 8,117 60% 4,870
Did Not Vote 2,610
TOTAL 100% 299,840 296,842 219,541
2017 Pct Jones Moore Other
Clinton 60.1% 98.0% 2.0% 0.0%
Trump 36.5% 21.0% 76.0% 3.0%
Other 2.2% 37.0% 40.0% 23.0%
DNV (new) 1.2% 59.0% 34.0% 7.0%
Match 100% 68.11% 30.21% 1.69%
Votes 219,541 149,521 66,315 3,704
Recorded 100% 68.11% 30.20% 1.69%
  219,541 149,522 66,309 3,710

True Vote estimate- Turnout Assumption: 80% Clinton; 66% Trump; 66% Other
2017 Pct Jones Moore Other
Clinton 56.6% 97.0% 2.0% 1.0%
Trump 40.1% 14.0% 84.0% 2.0%
Other 2.4% 37.0% 45.0% 18.0%
DNV (new) 0.9% 59.0% 34.0% 7.0%
True Estimate 100% 61.92% 36.21% 1.87%
Votes 219,541 135,937 79,504 4,100
Recorded 100% 68.11% 30.20% 1.69%
219,541 149,522 66,309 3,710

 

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 12, 2018 in 2016 election

 

Tags: , , , , ,

 
Richard Charnin's Blog

JFK Conspiracy and Systemic Election Fraud Analysis