To believe that Oswald killed JFK, you must believe that…

15 Sep

Richard Charnin
Sept.15, 2013
Updated: July 12,2014

Click Reclaiming Science:The JFK Conspiracy to look inside the book.

JFK Blog Posts
JFK Calc Spreadsheet Database

To believe that Oswald killed JFK, you must also believe that…

1- Two witnesses who claimed they saw Oswald carrying a bag into the Texas School Book Depository the morning of the assassination that was too small to contain a rifle must have been mistaken.

2- Julia Ann Mercer claimed in a deposition that she saw a man walking up the grassy knoll carrying a rifle one hour before the assassination and that the man waiting for him looked like Jack Ruby. Mercer told Jim Garrison that her deposition was altered and signature forged. She was not called by the Warren Commission. She must have been mistaken or lied.

3- The 51 eyewitnesses who claimed to have heard gunshots, saw smoke or smelled gunpowder coming from the grassy knoll must have all been mistaken.

4- The 22 Parkland Hospital doctors who claimed there was an entrance wound in President Kennedy’s throat must have all been mistaken.

5- The 44 Doctors and witnesses at Parkland and the autopsy who saw a large exit wound located at the right-rear of Kennedy’s head must have all been mistaken.

6- Eye witnesses at the Tippit scene who saw two shooters must have been mistaken.

7- The autopsy photograph of a bullet hole in Kennedy’s back, five inches lower than described in the Warren Report, must have been a misprint.

8- Dr Charles Carrico, who viewed Kennedy’s throat wound before the president’s shirt and tie were removed, claimed it was located above the shirt. He must have been mistaken.

9- John Connally, who was sitting directly in front of Kennedy and maintained under oath and in later interviews that he and Kennedy were hit by separate bullets, must have been mistaken.

10- Nellie Connally, who was sitting to her husband’s left and also claimed they were hit by separate bullets, must have been mistaken.

11- The fingerprint expert who identified the print found on the 6th floor of the TSBD to be an exact match of LBJ hit man Mac Wallace must have been mistaken.

12- Army and FBI experts who claimed that the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle was incapable of accomplishing the shooting must have been mistaken.

13 – DPD Marrion Baker and TSBD manager Truly, who both encountered Oswald holding a coke on the 2nd floor and not out of breath less than 90 seconds after the shooting, must have been mistaken.

14- Several witnesses who did not see or hear anyone running down the wooden stairs from the 6th floor must have been mistaken.

15- The large wound in the president’s head displayed all the signs of a soft–nosed bullet must have been caused by a very unusual solid, metal–jacketed bullet.

16- For the single–bullet theory to be valid, one must believe that a) Kennedy leaned much further forward than shown in photographs or films, b) his jacket bunched up much more than shown in a photograph taken less than half a second before he was visible from the sixth–floor window, and c) his shirt bunched up far more than could reasonably have been expected, d) a bullet on a 17 degree downward trajectory entered JFK’s back 5.5 inches below the collar changed direction and exited JFK’s throat.

17- Connally would be able to hold his hat seconds after being hit by the magic bullet that exited Kennedy’s throat.

18- JFK would fall back and to the left after being hit from behind.

19- Paraffin tests on Oswald’s hands and cheek which indicated he did not fire a rifle on 11/22 must have been incompetently administered.

20- Four police officers who saw “7.65 Mauser” on the barrel of the first rifle found on the 6th floor of the TSBD must have all been mistaken.

21- It was just a macabre coincidence that seven top FBI officials due to testify at HSCA would die within a 6 month period in 1977.

22- Bullets recovered at Dealey Plaza that did not match the Mannlicher-Carcano must have been from a previous shooting incident.

23- It was just a coincidence that Jack Ruby would die from sudden cancer within 29 days of being diagnosed and granted a new trial.

24- Oswald made two of three shots in under six seconds, a feat expert marksmen could not duplicate. He barely passed his Marine marksmanship test and used an inferior, bolt action rifle with a misaligned scope.

25 The Warren Commission did not “fudge the evidence” when it changed its original finding that three shots hit JFK to 1) a single bullet struck JFK in the back, exited his throat and caused five additional wounds in Connally, 2) the second shot missed, hit a curb and bystander James Tague on the cheek, and 3) the final shot hit JFK high on the back of the skull.

26- Although the probability is E-62 (one in a trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion) that 78 of 1400+ material witnesses would die unnaturally in 1964-78, it does not prove a conspiracy.

27- The fact that Fritz’s notes of his interrogation of Oswald did not surface until 1993 was due to incompetence on the part of the Warren Commission. In the notes, Oswald said he was “out front with Bill Shelley”.

28- The fact that Oswald was a $200/mo FBI informer was kept hidden by the WC was just an oversight.

29- The fact that Gerald Ford of the WC admitted that he moved JFK’s back wound up 5 inches to conform with the Single Bullet Theory does not indicate that he was distorting the record.

30- FBI agents Sibert and O’Neill attended the autopsy. They were filmed in separate interviews claiming that JFK was struck in the back 5 inches below the collar by a bullet that did not exit. They said that Gerald Ford committed a crime in moving the back entrance wound up 5 inches. You must believe that they were mistaken or lied.

Take the JFK Assassination Quiz.

These graphs are mathematical proof of a conspiracy.

About 50 of the 120 deaths were in Dallas which has a higher mortality rate than the national average. I tripled the national homicide rate from 0.000084 to 0.000253.
The probability P of 34 official homicides using the adjusted Dallas rate is P = 7.60e-17 or 1 in 13,000 trillion.

About these ads

Posted by on September 15, 2013 in JFK


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

6 responses to “To believe that Oswald killed JFK, you must believe that…

  1. John Strange

    February 28, 2014 at 6:35 pm

    In “Reclaiming History”, famed prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi enumerated 53 separate pieces of hard physical and circumstantial evidence that points to Oswald as the sole assassin off JFK. What is the probability that all 53 pieces of this incontrovertible evidence has innocent explanations?

  2. John Strange

    February 28, 2014 at 6:47 pm

    To believe Oswald didn’t assassinate Kennedy you would have to believe all 26 of the above myths and conspiracy “factoids”. None of which are true.

    • Richard Charnin

      March 3, 2014 at 4:38 pm

      You are very Strange, John.
      Go back to Lone Nutterville.

  3. david t. krall

    December 13, 2014 at 9:35 pm

    from: david t. krall
    You are to be commended, as your book if a “new” field to which you have explored and taken further what had been written prior on the “dead witnesses” angle or perspective. Within the past
    several years I have come across a few names that are not on any list. These names are of
    note because of their timeliness not just after, but before (some soon before) or after, and may or may not be “seen” as related, or “directly” related to the events of 11/22/63…I will pass these onto you in a future post/message, ok? You book is another “touchdown” for the good-guys,
    and for the American people, who have been manipulated and lied to with incredibly deceptive
    devices and many lies. BRAVO! What happened to JFK was an historical analogy and “inverse/mirror” of the “Valkryie” operation on 7/20/44. If we are told “big things like “THAT” don’t happen than what was the justification (the official/conventional reason) of & for spending trilions
    of dollars during the cold war and now during the (so-called) War On Terror…against lone nuts???
    & What was the planning and eventual attack at Pearl Harbor? small potatos???
    or a clearly planned enterprise, planned months in advance by some of the highest levels of the
    Japanese military, members of the Japanese Royal circle and some sectors of Japanese
    Corp circles close to those planning the events which culminated and resulted on 12/7/41…
    David T. Krall


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 791 other followers

%d bloggers like this: