Updated June 13, 2015
Click Reclaiming Science:The JFK Conspiracy to look inside the book.
To believe Oswald was not standing in front of the TSBD at 12:30pm, you must believe ALL of the following…
1- Oswald was on the 6th floor or somewhere else in the TSBD.
2- Oswald had no interest in viewing the motorcade.
3- Oswald lied to Det. Fritz when he said he was “out with Bill Shelley in front”.
4- Oswald ran from the 6th floor to the 2nd in 75-90 seconds where he was confronted by DPD Marrion Baker and Roy Truly who said he was drinking a coke. (note: in their original testimony they made no mention of having seen Oswald).
5- Fritz’s Oswald interview notes were hidden until 1993 due to poor record-keeping.
6- Fritz’s notes were not revealed by the Warren Commission due to administrative oversight.https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2014/04/05/10137/
7- Since no one claimed to seeing Oswald in front. it proves he was not there.
8- The Warren Commission would have allowed testimony that Oswald was in front.
9- The goal of the Commission was to get at the truth, not convict Oswald.
10- Faces in the Altgens6 photo were accidentally blotted out during photo processing. http://johnkimber.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/4-groden-oswald-altgens-6-ks.jpg?w=735
11- Judyth Baker’s pixelation analysis of Doorman’s shirt which proved that Lovelady was not Doorman is junk science. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1X2eD2Wl3xSmRHTuE02ntfYkb3ES2Kuo8wl3HHzzAlD8/pub
12- Lovelady lied to the Warren Commission when he said that he sat down to eat lunch on the STEPS in FRONT of Shelley.
13- Buelle Frazier lied on five occasions from 1963-86 when he said Lovelady was standing a few steps BELOW him:
1) Nov.22,1963 to the Dallas PD,
2) 1964 at the Warren Commission,
3) 1969 at the Garrison/Shaw trial,
4) 1978 at the HSCA,
5) 1986 at the Oswald Mock trial.
14- Warren Commission lawyer Ball asking Lovelady to point a BLACK arrow to himself in the BLACK area of Altgens6 is not suspicious. https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2014/08/07/10851/
15- Doorman “looks like Lovelady”, therefore it must be him.
16- If Doorman’s shirt did match Oswald’s, it was just a coincidence.
17- Just because Doorman wore Oswald’s shirt does not prove he was Oswald.
18- If Doorman’s open shirt did not match Lovelady’s short-sleeved striped or long-sleeve plaid shirt, it does disprove that Lovelady was Doorman.
19- Lovelady was mistaken when he stated to the FBI that he wore a vertically striped shirt which did not match Doorman’s shirt.
20- Oswald cannot be Doorman since it was decided long ago that Lovelady was Doorman.
21- Carolyn Arnold was mistaken in claiming she saw Oswald on the first floor of the TSBD at 12:25. http://22november1963.org.uk/carolyn-arnold-witness-oswald
22- The Altgens6 photo and Zapruder film were not altered and the photos of Oswald standing in the backyard were not fakes.
23- The visible portion of the cutout’s face does not match Lovelady… http://betshort.com/loveos.gif
24- There is no evidence that Officer Baker and Roy Truly lied about encountering Oswald on the 2nd floor. http://jfkthelonegunmanmyth.blogspot.com/2013/01/the-lunchroom-encounter-that-never-was.html
25. There was not enough time to alter Altgens6. http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2013/09/jfk-cartha-deloach-fbi-memorandum-and.html