RSS

Kansas 2014 Senate: Cumulative Vote share model confirms Wichita State Statistician

02 Apr

Richard Charnin
April 2, 2015

Look inside the books: Reclaiming Science: The JFK Conspiracy … Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts

Beth Clarkson, chief statistician for Wichita State’s National Institute for Aviation Research, filed an open records lawsuit in Sedgwick County District Court as part of her personal quest to find the answer to an unexplained pattern that transcends elections and states. She sued the top Kansas election official Wednesday, seeking paper tapes from electronic voting machines in an effort to explain statistical anomalies favoring Republicans in counts coming from large precincts across the country.  http://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article17139890.html

Thom Hartman interviews Clarkson: http://www.thomhartmann.com/bigpicture/something-very-very-wrong-wvoting-machines-ks

To confirm Clarkson’s results, I downloaded 2014 Kansas Senate precinct data for each county. Cumulative vote shares (CVS) were calculated for the five largest: Sedgwick, Johnson, Saline, Shawnee and Wyandotte and the Total for all counties.

Note the Republican state total cumulative share margin is in steady decline for the first 500,000 votes, but then becomes flat. Since the largest counties show the GOP cumulative share increasing with precinct size, it confirms that they were the counties where the anomalies occurred. In other words, the Independent Orman may have caught the Republican Roberts if the trend was not halted by election fraud (vote switching, disenfranchisement, etc.) in the larger (presumably more Democratic) precincts. 

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1D087y0AlsFiITeypDEk3W_c4P-O2iytQRCp85wFIw-Q/edit#gid=1367668624

Clarkson’s analysis confirms my previous CVS analysis of the 2014 Wisconsin, Florida, Maryland and South Dakota governor elections, all of which showed the same counter-intuitive, mathematically anomalous trend: cumulative vote shares increased in favor of the Republican candidate in large precincts. One would expect that the cumulative vote shares should move slightly in favor of the Democrats as larger (urban) precinct votes are added to the total. 
https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2015/02/27/proving-election-fraud-cumulative-vote-share-analysis/

“Clarkson, a certified quality engineer with a Ph.D. in statistics, said she has analyzed election returns in Kansas and elsewhere over several elections that indicate “a statistically significant” pattern where the percentage of Republican votes increase the larger the size of the precinct. While it is well-recognized that smaller, rural precincts tend to lean Republican, statisticians have been unable to explain the consistent pattern favoring Republicans that trends upward as the number of votes cast in a precinct or other voting unit goes up. In primaries, the favored candidate appears to always be the Republican establishment candidate, above a tea party challenger. And the upward trend for Republicans occurs once a voting unit reaches roughly 500 votes”.

“This is not just an anomaly that occurred in one place,” Clarkson said. “It is a pattern that has occurred repeatedly in elections across the United States.”
Read more here: http://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article17139890.html#storylink=cpy

Kansas Senate vote totals: Roberts (R) 460,350 – 53.1%;  Batson (L) 37,469 – 4.3%;  Orman (I) 368,372- 42.5%. Unfortunately, precinct data was not available for the Governor race: Davis (D) 401,100-46.1%; Brownback (R) 433,196-49.8%; Umbehr (L)- 35,206-4.0%

CVS and Stolen elections
https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2015/08/18/cumulative-vote-share-anomalies-indicators-of-rigged-elections/

This post links to CVS blog posts and related spreadsheets:
https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2015/08/02/election-fraud-models-cumulative-vote-shares-and-true-vote-analysis/

Precinct 
Size
 Matters:­
 The 
Large 
Precinct 
Bias
 in
 US 
Presidential
 Elections- G.F.
Webb (Vanderbilt
University,
Nashville,
TN
USA)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1410.8868.pdf

Kansas CVS graphs: five counties and state total

 
4 Comments

Posted by on April 2, 2015 in 2014 Elections

 

Tags: ,

4 responses to “Kansas 2014 Senate: Cumulative Vote share model confirms Wichita State Statistician

  1. AUDITAZ-EIC

    April 2, 2015 at 7:48 pm

    Thank you. I shared with Mickey Duniho. John

     
  2. Patricia Scott

    May 3, 2015 at 2:03 am

    All these links to voter fraud are fantastic! I shared two but wish these could somehow be shared on more massive scale. Excellent work!!!

     
    • Richard Charnin

      August 28, 2015 at 10:01 pm

      Thanks! But its ELECTION FRAUD, not Voter Fraud. Voters don’t cheat, election officials do.

       
  3. Frank Henry

    July 21, 2015 at 5:46 pm

    Lets hope Beth Clarkson gets the ok from court to do her live hand count on
    100% of the ballots of all positions on at least 5 races, Thanks and Good Luck,…
    Frank Henry,… 30 FULL Voting Rights Advocate,… Tel: 928-649-0249,…
    e-mail: fmhenry4@netzero.com

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Richard Charnin's Blog

JFK Conspiracy and Systemic Election Fraud Analysis

%d bloggers like this: