Democratic Primaries: Is Clinton leading by 3 million votes?

28 May

Democratic Primaries: Is Clinton leading by 3 million votes?

Richard Charnin
May 28, 2016

Richard Charnin

Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Exit Poll 
Democratic Primaries spread sheet
Recommended reading: election fraud-Nina Illingworth

The 3 million Clinton vote margin is repeated endlessly by the media. This analysis shows that the number is grossly inflated. Sanders may very well be leading the popular vote and corresponding delegate count. This is an updated analysis of estimated probabilities of fraud in the Democratic primaries.

This is why Sanders has done much better than his recorded vote:

– Actual votes in caucus states are not included in the count – to the benefit of Clinton.
– Exit polls indicated voting machines were hacked – to the benefit of Clinton.
– Voter rolls were manipulated – to the benefit of Clinton.
– Long lines and reduced polling stations reduced voter turnout – to the benefit of Clinton.

Sanders leads by approximately 780,000 votes (51.5-48.5%), assuming a) caucus votes are included, b) unadjusted exit polls represent the true vote, c) 10% of Sanders voters were disenfranchised and d) 5% of Clinton’s votes were fraudulent early/absentee ballots.  View the Democratic Primaries spread sheet.

Sanders won the caucuses easily. The largest states were MN, WA, CO. The actual votes were approximated by multiplying caucus vote shares by the state voting population, which is proportional to the electoral vote.

Votes for the primaries were calculated based on late exit polls. Sanders did approximately 4% better in the polls than in his recorded share. The National Election Pool discontinued exit polls after the Indiana primary.

Sanders exit poll share exceeded his recorded share in 24 of the 26 primaries which were exit polled. The probability is 1 in 190.000. The difference between his exit poll share and recorded share exceeded the margin of error in 11 primaries. The probability is 1 in 77 billion. Is the exit poll shift to Clinton just pure luck? Or is something else going on? 

Exit polls and caucuses indicate that Sanders has won 30 of 44 states and leads the electoral vote by  259-193. Clinton’s margin is reduced from 3 million to 1.3 million based on actual caucus votes and unadjusted exit polls.

A conservative estimate is that  10% of Sanders voters were disenfranchised due to long lines, reduced polling stations, switched/dropped party registrations,  uncounted provisional ballots, etc.  And  5% of Clinton’s votes were due to absentee ballot stuffing. New York, Arizona, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts and the southern red states are prime examples.

After adjusting for actual caucus votes and exit polls:

Clinton has won 11 RED states (normally Republican) by 2.1 million votes (64-36%)- before voter rolls, absentee/provisional ballot fraud. Clinton leads RED states by approximately 1.6 million (61-39%).

Sanders leads the non-RED states by 1.1 million- before voter rolls, absentee/provisional ballot fraud. Sanders leads non-RED states by approximately 57-43%, a 2.4 million vote margin.

Sanders leads overall by approximately one million votes.

Recorded Vote

Clinton Sanders Margin Total Clinton Sanders Margin
12,985 9,981 3,004 22,966 56.5% 43.5% 13.0%

Exit Poll/ actual caucus votes

Clinton Sanders Margin Clinton Sanders Margin
12,864 11,816 1,048 52.1% 47.9% 4.2%

Other adjustments

  Sanders   Clinton   Margin
 Vote(000) Recorded 9,981 43.5% 12,985 56.5% -3,004
Exit Poll +Caucus  Adjusted  11,816 47.9% 12,864 52.1% -1,048
Other: Reg switch/flip+Absentee/ provisional Final Adjusted 12,998 (+10%) 51.5% 12,221   (-5%) 48.5% 777
TOTAL Clinton Sanders Margin Clinton Sanders Margin
PRIMARIES 56.5% 43.5% -13.0% 12,985 9,981 -3,004
South Carolina 68.7% 31.3% -37.3% 252 115 -137
Arkansas 66.0% 34.0% -32.0% 138 71 -67
Alabama 73.2% 26.8% -46.3% 283 104 -179
Tennessee 63.2% 36.8% -26.3% 231 135 -96
Virginia 62.4% 37.6% -24.9% 486 292 -194
Georgia 65.7% 34.3% -31.4% 498 260 -238
Texas 61.5% 38.5% -23.0% 868 543 -325
Louisiana 75.4% 24.6% -50.8% 222 72 -149
Mississippi 78.5% 21.5% -57.0% 182 36 -146
North Carolina 56.3% 43.7% -12.7% 607 470 -136
Florida 64.0% 36.0% -27.9% 1,064 600 -464


TOTAL Clinton Sanders Margin Clinton Sanders Margin
TOTAL (EP+Caucus) 52.1% 48.1% -3.8% 12,865 11,817 -1,048
RED States 64.2% 35.8% 28.3% 4,831 2,698 -2,133
OTHER States 46.8% 53.2% -6.3% 8,034 9,119 1,085
OTHER, net Disenfranchised  43.2% 56.8% -13.6% 7,632 10,031 2,398
RED, net Disenfranchised 60.7% 39.3% 21.5% 4,589 2,968 -1,622
Adjusted Total 48.5% 51.5% -3.1% 12,222 12,998 777
Bernie Sanders’ exit poll share exceeded his recorded vote share by at least the margin of error in 11 of 26 primaries:AL AZ GA MA NY OH MS SC TX WI WV
The probability is 1 in 76.8 BILLION:
P = 1 – binomdist (10, 26, 0.025,true)
26 Exit Polls
n P=1 in
1 2
2 7
3 38
4 266
5 2,415
6 27,384
7 378,644
8 6,280,036
9 123,437,142
10 2,850,178,375
11 76,829,636,415
Inline image




Posted by on May 28, 2016 in 2016 election, Uncategorized


Tags: , , , , ,

45 responses to “Democratic Primaries: Is Clinton leading by 3 million votes?

  1. Joel Cortes

    May 28, 2016 at 9:32 pm

    Dear Dr Charnin, the Bernie Supporting groups are concerned about the exit polls, in your opinion what would be the best independent organization to make them and what are the requirements to start a process like that? Thank you very much in advance we hope you can guide us to that process.

  2. Cindy

    May 29, 2016 at 2:44 am

    Richard, is this accurate: “The second big red flag is Oklahoma. The two states out of 18 shifted “the other way,” from Clinton to Sanders, were Wisconsin (a 1.9% disparity) and Oklahoma (a 6.1% disparity, less than a one-in-ten likelihood of occurring). Why is this compelling? Because outlier Oklahoma is the only state among all these states in which the state, rather than the vendors, programs the vote counting computers.”


  3. Mary Shumay

    May 31, 2016 at 8:04 am

    There are no share buttons on your blog and worse yet a link does not even appear in my email for me to share.

  4. gklcapaa

    May 31, 2016 at 9:01 am

    “We need to include an estimate that 10% of Sanders voters were disenfranchised due to long lines, reduced polling stations, switched/dropped party registrations”

    Why do you assume 100% of people disenfrachised were Sanders supporters? Isn’t it true that Sanders supporters are more young and more enthusiastic than Clinton supporters? Shouldn’t longer lines and reduced polling stations tend to disenfrachise the older and less enthusiastic voters rather than the younger and more enthusiastic ones?

    Why do not account for the natural disenfranchisment that caucuses create?

    • Richard Charnin

      May 31, 2016 at 10:59 am

      Where did I say that? I do not assume 100% of the disenfranchised are Sanders supporters. I assume that a net 10% are.
      And I base it on documented data from NY, AZ and other states.

    • Mary Shumay

      June 1, 2016 at 10:37 am

      The DNC stole Sanders Data base. Dont’ see any Clinton supporters crying that they were thrown off. A bit odd I would think.

  5. Nathan Gant

    May 31, 2016 at 10:18 pm


    Thanks for all your pioneering work in exit polling. I think exit polling must be used as an integral part of the election process, and more importantly, it should be independent of corporate control and/or state bureaucracy. Which I think should mean some kind of federal initiatives to promote and assist citizen involvement at local levels.

    In the recent “stop election theft 2016” videos on youtube, Harvey Wasserman and Greg Palast commented on how votes are nullified or ‘stripped and flipped’ by official election personnel, it is being done in secret after the voter leaves the precinct and in some cases, the same voters may have been accurately counted in exit polling data.

    In no case is the nullified voter ever contacted after his or her vote is discarded or why it was ever nullified, in some cases after waiting for hours in line to cast a vote. Deliberately causing bottle-necks for African-American early voter was one of the documented cases covered in the above cited videos.

    This would possibly explain at least some of the wild discrepancies between official counts and the margins of errors in the exit polling data.

    I think exit polling can be accurate to levels surpassing 3-sigma in quality control, 95% confidence intervals, which is analogous to the standard 3-4% margin of error in exit polling. That’s what Edison Research uses.

    But as long as election officials are using ‘strip and flip’ tactics to target African-American, Hispanic and other minority voters, from confidential computer-generated lists available beforehand, we will at least have consistent proof of the fraud by your excellent data.

    The same officials insist that there a millions of illegal voters, sometimes voting in two different states at the same time. Yet no one is ever charged with such felonies or investigated in any formal way. This is premeditated corruption from the election office bureaucracies.

    Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman detail all of this in “THE STRIP & FLIP SELECTION OF 2016: Five Jim Crows & Electronic Election Theft”.

    • Mary Shumay

      June 1, 2016 at 10:34 am

      I have heard that they are not intending to do any exit polls at all on the remaining states and wonder what we can do to insist that they do.

  6. RLS

    June 1, 2016 at 8:57 pm


    The Institute for American Democracy & Election Integrity has arranged for the Columbus Institute of Contemporary Journalism to conduct an exit poll in California. I sent them an email to see if they had raised enough money for the poll and they told me they received a grant from Election Justice USA to cover the cost. Your interview with Lee Camp is on their website:

    • Richard Charnin

      June 1, 2016 at 10:26 pm


      First of all, I want to thank you for those great comments on my analysis in the NY Times and elsewhere.
      I posted links to it on Facebook.
      I have already posted the link to the in a number of Facebook election groups.
      Are you on Facebook?

      • Bev

        June 6, 2016 at 10:02 pm

        Richard and everyone. Google Hillary Clinton. NYTimes, Time, AP, others are reporting Hillary has already “clinched” the nomination as the democratic presidential nominee, before Tuesday’s voting. They want to tell us how they did it. We could better tell them.

        No way.

      • Bev

        June 6, 2016 at 10:27 pm

        I love Cliff Arnebeck, Bob Fritrakis, Richard Charnin, Bev Harris, Lee Camp, Tim Robbins, Mark Crispin Miller, Beth Clarkson, so many others, so decent in the service of truth and justice. Love, love, love them.

        via: Lee Camp twitter
        @LeeCamp Watch this!!! MSM to be sued as accessories to fraud as well…

        We are suing the media as being complicit in the crime. They are acting as accessories after the fact.

        Attorney Arnebeck has kept the FBI in the loop, has a Judge, and is filing a very strong RICO suit. It includes exit polling data that indicates fraud. It includes Bev Harris’s find on the code in those machines.

        It doesn’t matter what the media says. They are being sued for election fraud.

      • Bev

        June 6, 2016 at 11:27 pm

        10000 singing Beethoven – Ode an die Freude _ Ode to Joy

      • Bev

        June 7, 2016 at 8:46 pm

        I should put a source link to the video with Election Attorney Cliff Arnebeck. This is the long form video which goes through the history of stolen elections with important interviews, and brings to current date, with Arnebeck’s filing a RICO racketeering lawsuit against those fraudulent voting machine companies with the found by Bev Harris code that fractionalizes votes and so Bernie’s delegate count. Arnebeck is also RICOing the media as complicit in the crime of covering up the fraud of those machines, by manipulating exit polls to match the machines. We will have to spread the word, as MSM will be reluctant to report on their own colluding racketeering. How will media ever be the same.

        Richard Charnin, I am applauding you now and forever. Take a bow at your soonest convenience.

        Bob Fitrakis, Cliff Arnebeck and Lori Grace
7:30-10:00 pm, Wednesday May 25, and Friday May 27, 2016, (video below is of Friday’s presentation)
Sunrise Center, 645 Tamalpais, Corte Madera, CA

        complete video 2 hours 25 minutes

        We can thank Cliff Arnebeck, Bob Fitrakis and Lori Grace, along with Richard Charnin, Bev Harris, Greg Palast and more, that by the time of the Democratic National Convention, this RICO lawsuit will have changed history and the minds of many politicians to reform our election process, and announce the CORRECT WINNER of this Democratic Primary, so that we can party at the Convention for having saved each other and our future with a true democracy. That is some legacy Richard. Thank you so much.

    • Bev

      June 6, 2016 at 8:45 pm

      Yes, those are the organizations that election lawyers Bob Fritrakis and Cliff Arnebeck talk about in the NEWSBUD interview. They also said that they have developed an app to assist in the exit polling.

      Video URL:
      Start @ 17:00
      To See the Interview with Bob Fritrakis and Cliff Arnebeck

      • jeannettebaroque

        June 8, 2016 at 1:23 am

        My understanding is that the only lawsuit being filed by Arnebeck and Fritrakis is in Ohio. I wish they were doing other states as well, but I think not. So unfortunately, I am doubtful that their work will have a big enough impact to save Bernie’s campaign. Please LMK if I am wrong about this. I just don’t think we should raise false hopes for everyone if in fact the only lawsuit they have filed is in Ohio…

      • Mary Shumay

        June 8, 2016 at 4:49 pm

        I was under the impression that suits have been brought already in California and Puerto Rico, and one is still open in NY?

      • Bev

        June 9, 2016 at 7:07 pm

        shorter reply:
        to jeannettebaroque and Mary Shumay,

        I believe it was filed in Ohio, but is concurrent with a Federal RICO racketeering lawsuit which allows the inclusion of ALL STATES. Arnebeck is filing in both State and Federal courts a very strong RICO case that not only covers all states, but, also covers a long timeline of current and past crimes. They have the evidence. Arnebeck says they are nailed.

        I believe there are also separate state lawsuits on-going. Those lawyers and activists should talk with Arnebeck and Fitrakis for any additional strengthening, or overlapping of the total of their lawsuits.

        So, what happened to #ExitPollGate and what stopped media from conducting exit polls on the last part of these primaries.

        Cliff Arnebeck had talked with the media companies responsible for conducting exit polling before the primaries in California, New Jersey etc., and required that they provide the raw date, the unadjusted exit polling, and if they did not comply, he would sue them. That is exactly when media stopped conducting exit polling before these last primaries. They even stopped in Kentucky which they had announced they were covering, to stop the raw data which would not have matched the machines. Thus, putting Richard out of work…so it seemed. His topics have been germane even without exit polling data.

        And, look what Richard’s work did for justice and democracy. WOW. Richard, Arnebeck, Fitrakis, Bev Harris, Palast, and more, and all of their works and their stories will be in history books, because I do think we will be the victor writing those history books. I do think this will work out just as Arnebeck has described. I guess I am celebrating early. But, there is an upside to celebrating early, it counters all that undue celebrating going on over there on the Clinton/media/voting machine side of things.

        So Cheers to Richard and everyone here. It has been some journey together.

      • Bev

        June 10, 2016 at 5:33 pm

        I just found an interview made today of Bob Fitrakis updating information about the RICO suit and California.

        6-10-16 Nicole Sandler Show – Election Integrity – Fact or Fraud?
        Bob Fitrakis on The Nicole Sandler Show
        Nicole Sandler

        54:10 on video to see better than the rough transcript below:

        Update: The RICO lawsuit has not yet been filed.

        Originally, attorneys Cliff Arnebeck and Bob Fitrakis were going to file their RICO lawsuit earlier on June 6th in order to get the networks to release the raw data on exit polls for the California primary. The networks cancelled exit polls instead.

        The RICO suit will be filed. The problem is they ran into a huge problems in California.

        With the donations they are getting, Arnebeck and Fitrakis are beefing up legal staff.

        California the eight largest nation on earth had some of the most massive irregularities. Fitrakis said he was getting emails constantly from poll workers and election observers saying 25% of people in my precinct were forced to vote provisionally.

        Systematic problems with registration being wrong, peoples showed up saying they had registered to vote in the Democrat primary, but instead were registered as being in other parties which meant that they could not vote for a president candidate.

        Fitrakis said, we did some limited exit polling ourselves and those numbers are being crunched.
        The suits and it looks like there may be two of them: the initial one over getting the exit polls and also a second one getting discovery for criminal activity which is the one that should go first, be filed first.

        But California had massive levels of irregularities and what looks like outright fraud. Most of California should be roped off as a crime scene. it happened deliberately from party loyalists and private corporations.

        California has delayed us somewhat and caused us to beef up legal staff. He says they will be filing next week.

        For donations go to or

      • jeannettebaroque

        June 11, 2016 at 2:49 am

        Bev, thanks for the info. I am terribly disappointed about the delay with the lawsuit – but not surprised. In the original Trustvote video from May 29, I thought their claims about planning to file by June 6 sounded totally unrealistic, since they hadn’t even decided whether to file in Federal or State court. I am afraid they may be thinking of waiting so that the focus will be more about protecting against stolen votes from Trump in November, rather than correcting the injustice already done to Bernie and his voters. I hope I am wrong.

  7. Cindy

    June 2, 2016 at 12:44 am

    Richard, since so many people vote early in CA, I’m wondering if we will have the number of votes for each candidate ON ELECTION DAY to compare to the exit polls…. or will they simply lump it all together and not give us the June 7 numbers (without actually calling every last county in CA)? Won’t we need this in order to accurately compare to the exit poll? This state doesn’t just have absentee voters.. many voters vote permanently by mail.

    I’m keeping my fingers crossed that we’ll get to know this time which precincts were polled but I hope they don’t release that in advance.

    • Mary Shumay

      June 2, 2016 at 9:50 am

      I have heard tell that they do intend to call it early for CLINTON!!!

      • Richard Charnin

        June 2, 2016 at 11:28 am

        They have no shame. They will look like idiots and lose more viewers. It’s going to the convention. And if Bernie wins CA and NJ, it will make the media whores look even worse. Bernie would win CA with at least 57% in a fair election.

      • Mary Shumay

        June 2, 2016 at 1:00 pm

        I totally agree with you. I have responded to this with; ARE THEY BEGGING FOR US TO BOYCOTT THEM?” I now find the Media so completely disgusting now since being so involved with this election to see just how manipulative and low they really are. People have begun many petitions and this is only one of them, along with the #OccupyCNN movement;

  8. Cindy

    June 2, 2016 at 4:24 am

    • Richard Charnin

      June 2, 2016 at 11:23 am

      We need actual precinct votes to compare to the exit polls. I would poll 50 precincts in major locations (at least 50 respondents per precinct).

      • Bev

        June 2, 2016 at 1:26 pm

        Before the election in California there needs to be a remedy for the following.
        And, for the first time in months, a comment to Washingtonsblog on disqus has taken:

        In comments:
        If the media do not correct this illegality of misinformation before the election, then Bernie should create an ad specifically to address and remedy this situation with voters taking to the polls the specific law in writing allowing them to vote on regular ballots.

        Also, the person who misinformed the Orange County poll workers, needs to be arrested now, publicly and asked who told him or her to illegally say that.

        Placebo Ballots: Stealing California From Bernie Using an Old GOP Vote-Snatching Trick
        By Greg Palast and Dennis J Bernstein, Reader Supported News

        The Best Democracy Money Can Buy: The Election Crimes Bulletin

        Alert! California poll workers have been told to give all independent voters “provisional” ballots if they want to vote in Democratic Party. That’s illegal – and will insure that Sanders voters’ ballots end up in the garbage, uncounted.

        A special bulletin for California voters. And for the rest of you, how this same trickery – shifting voters to provisional ballots which are rarely counted – can steal the White House and Congress for the GOP in November.

        Here’s the 411. If you’re registered as an independent voter in California, you have the right to vote in the Democratic Presidential Primary. Just ask for the ballot. But look out! Reports out of Orange County are that some poll workers have been told to give “No Party Preference” (NPP), independent voters, PROVISIONAL ballots as opposed to regular ballots.

        Voter, BEWARE! Do NOT accept a PROVISIONAL BALLOT! They’re really “Placebo Ballots” – they give you the satisfaction of feeling like you’ve voted, without the inconvenience of anyone actually having to count them!

        And for our readers in the other 49 states: You can bet that the GOP will be shunting voters to these placebo provisional ballots in November. In the last election, over two MILLION voters, overwhelmingly voters of color, were shifted to these rarely-counted ballots. That’s how you steal elections.

        No, I’m not promoting Bernie, nor Ernie, nor anyone. I’m promoting democracy. Let’s make sure your vote counts. Read on (or listen in) while Dennis Bernstein and I take you through that ugly sausage factory calling the American voting system….

      • Mary Shumay

        June 2, 2016 at 11:48 pm

        Has been shared to my Facebook page. Thanks for the heads up! We can can call talk radio shows also in the other states.

  9. RLS

    June 2, 2016 at 1:06 pm


    I’m one of a few who is not on Facebook. I want to thank you for the important work that you are doing on election fraud – I’ve learned a lot from your interviews and blog posts.

  10. deejayaztek

    June 5, 2016 at 5:41 pm

    My registration was changed from D to unregistered.

  11. Pedro Perez

    June 5, 2016 at 9:59 pm

    Richard thank you for all your hard work and input. To me you are a patriot. Thank you.

  12. jeannettebaroque

    June 6, 2016 at 1:56 pm

    Richard, your work is so important and we MUST get the mainstream media to pay attention. May I suggest, would you be willing to remove your JFK-conspiracy work from the blog for the time being, so that the blog would be solely focused on this crucial election fraud issue? I’m asking because when I share a link to your blog, the title that gets shared is “JFK conspiracy and election fraud analysis.” You know, so many people have an allergic reaction to anyone who is a “JFK-conspiracy theorist,” they just shut you out immediately. I’m sure your work on JFK is outstanding and important, but at the moment, the election-fraud work is what’s crucial. If your site were solely focused on that, I think the number of Shares would multiply exponentially. Thank you for considering it! Best, Jeannette

    • Richard Charnin

      June 6, 2016 at 5:25 pm

      No, I will not. The JFK Conspiracy is a fact. I wrote a book on it.
      Those who do not believe it was a conspiracy will not believe that Election Fraud is systemic.
      If they do not approve of my mentioning JFK, they don’t have to read my blog.
      You are not the first one to make this outrageous suggestion.

      • Bev

        June 6, 2016 at 7:23 pm

        The two subjects–election fraud and the assassination of JFK–have a deep common link, the undoing of a democracy where people’s votes and the leaders they voted for, are removed by way of a coup. A link so important that it bears mentioning before California, in case Bernie and his supporters can overrun the fraud that has been built into this primary election.


        Sibel Edmonds has posted the first NEWSBUD report which mentions Richard Charnin’s work, and interviews election lawyers Bob Fritrakis and Cliff Arnebeck who discuss the upcoming Exit Polling which will take place in California tomorrow. They also say they have developed an app which will be used to assist exit polling.

        First Newsbud Report
        Dear Friends & Supporters, 
        We are proud and excited to announce that our first Newsbud production is ready for viewing.
        Video URL: 
        Start @ 17:00
        To See the Interview with Bob Fritrakis and Cliff Arnebeck
        We have 16 more days to reach our goal! Please, share our Newsbud Report with everyone you know via email, Facebook, Twitter, Google+, Instagram, and other networks, and help us succeed. And remember, this is a four-phase process. Every dollar we receive above $150K will get us closer to being fully operational and reduce the number of campaigns we have to run. 
        Enjoy the video and thank you for your support. 
        Sibel Edmonds

        Sibel Edmonds kickstarter fundraising site is her second attempt. Please donate if you can.
        Support a 100% People-Funded Online News Outlet, Phase 1
        This project will only be funded if at least $150,000 is pledged by Wed, Jun 22 2016 1:03 AM CDT.

        This is the article that informed me that the intelligence agencies, backed by corporations profiting from privatizing resources, spying, war, are owners of those fraudulent evidence-removed e-voting, e-scanning, e-tabulating machines:

        Who owns Scytl? George Soros isn’t in the voting machines, but the intelligence community is
by Gerry Bello

        In 2010, Scytl purchased a 100% interest in SOE software, an up and coming player in the American elections market with their Clarity Software Suite which is used in 525 jurisdictions in 19 states. SOE has a strategic partnership with ES & S, the major marketer of electronic voting systems in the US. ES & S was sued by the US DOJ in 2009 on anti-trust grounds after purchasing Diebold’s elections division, Premier Election Solutions. ES & S subsequently sold Premier to rival manufacturer Dominion. Bob Urosevich, founder of ES & S, was also President of Diebold. In 2006 Urosevich was listed as managing director of Scytl Americas, although his name has subsequently been removed from their website.

        Get ready to SUPPORT and PROTECT Bernie Sanders.

        Bushs are CIA, perhaps Obama and the Clintons are too, since they do not correct the fraud in the voting machines that they are benefiting from, nor do they disclose last documentation on JFK (now the Bush’s Carlyle group owns the JFK Library, ).

        And, the CIA is not better than a Democracy. They should not be deciding our future. Perhaps they think it is kinder, gentler to select presidents rather than eliminate our best leaders:

        Miami Jury: CIA Involved in JFK Assassination
        By The Spotlight Global Research, May 01, 2014

        Not a single major newspaper nor any national news broadcast has ever reported that on Feb. 6, 1985, a jury in Miami concluded that the CIA was involved in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

        This is remarkable, if only because the verdict came in a court case featuring two international celebrities: Water gate burglar E. Howard Hunt — perhaps the most infamous CIA operative in history — and his courtroom nemesis — attorney Mark Lane. Lane’s ground-break ing best-seller, Rush to Judgment, had convinced millions of readers there had been a conspiracy in the JFK assassination, the Warren Commission’s claims notwithstanding.

        Scattered news reports did mention Hunt had lost a libel case against The SPOTLIGHT. However, no media reported what the jury forewoman had told the press:

        Mr. Lane was asking us to do something very difficult. He was asking us to believe John Kennedy had been killed by our own government. Yet when we examined the evidence closely, we were compelled to conclude that the CIA had indeed killed President Kennedy.

        Until 1992, when Lane recounted the trial in Plausible Denial and put forth additional compelling evidence of CIA complicity in the crime, the only substantive news reports about the trial appeared in The SPOTLIGHT. In issue No. 7 for 1985 (Feb. 18), The SPOTLIGHT announced its victory, detailing the remarkable events that led to the trial.

        The affair was set in motion on Aug. 14, 1978, when The SPOTLIGHT published an article by former CIA official Victor Marchetti who revealed the CIA intended to publicly “admit” Hunt had been involved in the JFK assassination, acting as a “rogue” agent without CIA sanction.

        A top CIA liaison to anti-Castro Cuban exiles in the early 1960s, Hunt was unknown to the public until the Watergate scandal that toppled President Nixon in 1974 brought Hunt ill fame. Then, after Watergate, when the Rockefeller Commission investigated CIA misdeeds, two eccentric writers alleged Hunt was one of three “tramps” photographed in Dallas minutes after the JFK assassination.

        Subsequent investigation refuted the “Hunt as tramp” theory. However, scandal sheets had hyped the story and many came to believe Hunt had a hand in Dallas.

        In 1976, growing skepticism about the Warren Commission’s claim that a “lone assassin” had killed JFK forced the House of Representatives to convene a new assassination inquiry.

        In the midst of the House investigation, an unusual development occurred:

        As Marchetti’s SPOTLIGHT article reported, an in-house CIA memo, ostensibly written in 1966 — some 12 years previously — was leaked to congressional investigators.

        The memo stated Hunt had been in Dallas on the day of the JFK assassination, and that CIA officials were concerned the agency would one day have to explain Hunt’s presence there.

        The SPOTLIGHT subsequently learned CIA Director Richard Helms and the CIA’s chief of counterintelligence, James Angleton, had signed off on the memo.

        Marchetti suggested that because the CIA perceived Hunt to be a villain in the public’s eye as a consequence of Watergate, the CIA had decided to sacrifice Hunt and “admit” he had been involved in the assassination.


        Coretta Scott King: “We have done what we can to reveal the truth, and we now urge you as members of the media, and we call upon elected officials, and other persons of influence to do what they can to share the revelation of this case to the widest possible audience.” – King Family Press Conference, Dec. 9, 1999.

        Dr. Martin Luther King’s family and personal friend/attorney, William F. Pepper, won a civil trial that found US government agencies guilty of Martin’s assassination/wrongful death. The 1999 trial, King Family versus Jowers and Other Unknown Co-Conspirators, is the only trial ever conducted on the assassination of Dr. King. The King Center fully documents the case, ( ) with full trial transcript (to more fully explain the following summary of trial evidence, here is the best article I’ve found: How the Government Killed Martin Luther King, Jr. By Kevin Barrett ).

        We have to save kids and democracy and our future as a species.

        If we cannot prevail over this coup, then Gene Sharp’s writings and strategies have already worked in several countries. And, Gene Sharp is so well respected and mainstream that there is an annual parade in Boston Mass. for him:

        Gene Sharp’s online book:
        From Dictatorship to Democracy: A Conceptual Framework for Liberation
        see the index for
        over 200 nonviolent actions to construct positive change toward a democracy.

        Click to access FDTD.pdf

        Become a supporter — 24 days left
        Albert Einstein Institution
        Advancing freedom through nonviolent action
        View at
        How the CIA made Google
        by Nafeez Ahmed

        INSURGE INTELLIGENCE, a new crowd-funded investigative journalism project, breaks the exclusive story of how the United States intelligence community funded, nurtured and incubated Google as part of a drive to dominate the world through control of information. Seed-funded by the NSA and CIA, Google was merely the first among a plethora of private sector start-ups co-opted by US intelligence to retain ‘information superiority.’

        The origins of this ingenious strategy trace back to a secret Pentagon-sponsored group, that for the last two decades has functioned as a bridge between the US government and elites across the business, industry, finance, corporate, and media sectors. The group has allowed some of the most powerful special interests in corporate America to systematically circumvent democratic accountability and the rule of law to influence government policies, as well as public opinion in the US and around the world. The results have been catastrophic: NSA mass surveillance, a permanent state of global war, and a new initiative to transform the US military into Skynet.

        Part 2
        View at
        Why Google made the NSA
        Inside the secret network behind mass surveillance, endless war, and Skynet—

        Mass surveillance is about control. It’s promulgators may well claim, and even believe, that it is about control for the greater good, a control that is needed to keep a cap on disorder, to be fully vigilant to the next threat. But in a context of rampant political corruption, widening economic inequalities, and escalating resource stress due to climate change and energy volatility, mass surveillance can become a tool of power to merely perpetuate itself, at the public’s expense.

        A major function of mass surveillance that is often overlooked is that of knowing the adversary to such an extent that they can be manipulated into defeat. The problem is that the adversary is not just terrorists. It’s you and me. To this day, the role of information warfare as propaganda has been in full swing, though systematically ignored by much of the media.

        Here, INSURGE INTELLIGENCE exposes how the Pentagon Highlands Forum’s co-optation of tech giants like Google to pursue mass surveillance, has played a key role in secret efforts to manipulate the media as part of an information war against the American government, the American people, and the rest of the world: to justify endless war, and ceaseless military expansionism.

        In other words, how can the Pentagon find a way to exploit the information revolution to “control global policy debates,” particularly on “national economic policies”?

        Why is the Pentagon funding research investigating how to exploit people’s “sacred values” to extinguish their capacity for logical reasoning, and enhance their emotional openness to “morally-questionable behavior”?

        Hagel’s departure paved the way for Pentagon officials linked to the Highlands Forum to consolidate government influence. These officials are embedded in a longstanding shadow network of political, industry, media and corporate officials that sit invisibly behind the seat of government, yet literally write its foreign and domestic national security policies whether the administration is Democrat of Republican, by contributing ‘ideas’ and forging government-industry relationships.

        It is this sort of closed-door networking that has rendered the American vote pointless. Far from protecting the public interest or helping to combat terrorism, the comprehensive monitoring of electronic communications has been systematically abused to empower vested interests in the energy, defense, and IT industries.

        No more shadows

        Yet in the long-run, the information imperialists have already failed. This investigation is based entirely on open source techniques, made viable largely in the context of the same information revolution that enabled Google. The investigation has been funded entirely by members of the public, through crowd-funding. And the investigation has been published and distributed outside the circuits of traditional media, precisely to make the point that in this new digital age, centralized top-down concentrations of power cannot overcome the power of people, their love of truth and justice, and their desire to share.

        What are the lessons of this irony? Simple, really: The information revolution is inherently decentralized, and decentralizing. It cannot be controlled and co-opted by Big Brother. Efforts to do so will in the end invariably fail, in a way that is ultimately self-defeating.

        The latest mad-cap Pentagon initiative to dominate the world through control of information and information technologies, is not a sign of the all-powerful nature of the shadow network, but rather a symptom of its deluded desperation as it attempts to ward off the acceleration of its hegemonic decline.

        But the decline is well on its way. And this story, like so many before it, is one small sign that the opportunities to mobilize the information revolution for the benefit of all, despite the efforts of power to hide in the shadows, are stronger than ever.

      • jeannettebaroque

        June 6, 2016 at 8:15 pm

        Richard, I’m so sorry if I offended you. That was certainly not my intention. Your JFK work deserves the respect of the mainstream world, just as your Election Fraud work does. I just think that the Election issue is much more likely to be accepted by the general public first – because it is timely and urgent, and it is more about mathematics – and your numbers are virtually impossible to challenge. Your election work is NEEDED by the world, right now. Urgently. And if that work could be brought to the attention of the mainstream media now and accepted by some prominent and respected journalists, it will send shock-waves throughout the world. We all know that the establishment and mainstream media are cursory and shallow… so sometimes we have go 1 step at a time, dishing things out in reasonable bites… And we need to start with the item that is most palatable. In other words, trying to get the mainstream establishment and media to look seriously at your Election work and JFK work at the same time is just overwhelming. But if we could just give them 1 of the issues first – the one that is so timely and crucial – it would bring you huge attention and respect. And after that, it would become much easier for them to pay attention to your JFK work, as they should. Again, I apologize if my comment offended you in any way.

      • Bev

        June 6, 2016 at 8:58 pm

        There is a Gene Sharp Day in Boston. But, not a parade. Perhaps, there should be a parade.

        Bostonians Celebrate Life and Work of Gene Sharp

        Last Monday night, Bostonians gathered to recognize one of their own. Gene Sharp, who has lived on a quiet street in East Boston since 1968, is known to his neighbors as an unassuming intellectual with a love of gardening. To dictators around the globe, however, he is better known as a promoter of the dangerous idea that the real power in a society lies not with its rulers, but with its people.

        Dr. Sharp, who has been called “the Clausewitz of nonviolent warfare,” has made his life’s work the study of strategic nonviolent action as a powerful alternative to both passivity and violence. He is the author of dozens of books, and his book “From Dictatorship to Democracy” has been translated into over forty languages while spreading among dissidents around the world. In 1983, Sharp founded the Albert Einstein Institution, which continues to promote the use and study of nonviolent action from offices in Boston’s South End today.

        And so, this Monday night Bostonians filed into District Hall, a community space looking out over Boston Harbor and the city’s glittering skyline, to honor Gene Sharp. The reason for the event was a proclamation by Mayor Marty Walsh declaring April 27, 2015 to be “Gene Sharp Day” in the city of Boston.

  13. jag37777

    June 7, 2016 at 6:50 pm

    What just happened in Puerto Rico might be the most blatant fix ever.

  14. CarlAntoine

    June 11, 2016 at 10:48 pm

    Reblogged this on carlantoine and commented:
    #BernieSanders #FeelTheBern #PoliticalRevolution #OfThePeople #BernieOrBust {#Clinton #Trump} #JillStein #ElectionFraud #ExitPoll

  15. Bev

    June 12, 2016 at 11:13 am

    To Carl, Please add
    and if it does not exist, please create #GetRidOfVotingMachines

    Also, we need something about Cliff Arnebeck’s and Bob Fitrakis’s RICO racketeering lawsuit which they will file next week against the voting machine companies whose code, which was found by Bev Harris, fractionalized votes and changed outcomes, and media who is complicit after the fact by adjusting the exit polling to match the fraudulent machines. See Below after some suggestions for hashtags that need to be created:

    Lee Camp is good at creating memes for hashtags:

    Maybe something like:


    or something better.

    Get Rid of Those Voting Machines Now, because look what Bev Harris found–EVIDENCE:

    Fraction Magic – Part 1: Votes are being counted as fractions instead of as whole numbers

    By Bev Harris May 12, 2016

    – Summary – This report summarizes the results of our review of the GEMS election management system, which counts approximately 25 percent of all votes in the United States. The results of this study demonstrate that a fractional vote feature is embedded in each GEMS application which can be used to invisibly, yet radically, alter election outcomes by pre-setting desired vote percentages to redistribute votes. This tampering is not visible to election observers, even if they are standing in the room and watching the computer. Use of the decimalized vote feature is unlikely to be detected by auditing or canvass procedures, and can be applied across large jurisdictions in less than 60 seconds.

    GEMS vote-counting systems are and have been operated under five trade names: Global Election Systems, Diebold Election Systems, Premier Election Systems, Dominion Voting Systems, and Election Systems & Software, in addition to a number of private regional subcontractors. At the time of this writing, this system is used statewide in Alaska, Connecticut, Georgia, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Utah and Vermont, and for counties in Arizona, (upcoming) California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming. It is also used in Canada.

  16. Kill

    June 17, 2016 at 10:49 pm

    I’ve been browsing on-line more than 3 hours these days, yet I never discovered any
    attention-grabbing article like yours. It is lovely worth enough
    for me. In my view, if all site owners and bloggers made excellent content
    material as you did, the internet will likely be a lot more helpful than ever

  17. Deborah E. Brasher

    July 4, 2016 at 10:47 pm

    This information first came to my attention via the Internet. It is nowhere to be found on MSNBC or CNN. Have not seen it in the New York Times, although I may have missed it there. What is going on ? It seems to me this is a big news story. Where are the journalists ? Why is this appalling news story, if it has validity, as it seems to, not being reported by the major news organizations ?
    As impossible as it seems, are these major news organizations somehow part of this story ? Perhaps the Germans and the Dutch have it right; they have outlawed electronic voting because of the fraud threat it poses.


Leave a Reply to Richard Charnin Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: