Aug. 10, 2016
This post links to Nina Illingworth’s terrific series on Election Fraud. Although Nina did not contact me, she researched my analysis extensively and accurately explained the essential focus along with providing much additional information. I cannot recommend this fantastic series more highly.
“History is a set of lies agreed on” – Bernard Le Bouyer de Fontenelle
If we’re being completely honest with each other, I’m not really sure when the true, horrifying nature of what I’d discovered really started to sink into my conscious mind – frankly, there’s a part of me that’s still deeply in shock about all of this and I don’t mind sharing that fact with you folks right from the outset. It’s not every day that you find yourself assembling overwhelming evidence that the Democratic Party Presidential nomination process is almost certainly fixed in favor of the establishment candidate, after all.
Rarer still I imagine, are days in which you accidentally stumble across the work of a qualified mathematician that seems to objectively prove every single fucking Presidential Election in America since at least 1988 is a goddamn sham – while simultaneously calling into question thousands of elections across all levels of government over that same time period. Worse yet, this realization in and of itself casts shadows of doubt over the last twenty-five years of history in the Western World; can any decision influenced in any way by the US government over that time truly be said to be “the will of the people” if you know without a doubt that there’s no such thing as a fair election anymore?
PART 1 – The 2016 Democratic Primary
This portion of our series focuses on exit polls, Richard Charnin and the overwhelming evidence currently available all over the internet that the 2016 Democratic Primary has been fixed for Hillary Clinton and against democratic socialist candidate Bernie Sanders. Please be reminded that while it is not necessary to follow the links in this article to understand what I’ve written, your comprehension of the piece will be greatly improved by doing so – particularly when discussing Charnin’s data.
PART 2- Hoosier Mommy
This installment of Wicked Game returns to the Democratic Primary, looks at the historical evidence of widespread election fraud in American politics since at least 1988 and cleans up some debunking attempts I forgot to discuss last time. Please be reminded that while it is not necessary to follow the links in this article to understand what I’ve written, your comprehension of the piece will be greatly improved by doing so – particularly when discussing data analyzed by Richard Charnin.
PART 3: Desert Scam
This installment of Wicked Game finds us wandering the barren, desert wasteland of Nevada to further examine the absolutely goddamn shameful behavior of Barbara Lange, Barbara Boxer and the entire state Democratic Convention Committee – everything is 1968 again as we hurtle towards a DNC in Philly that, with each passing day is starting to look more and more like a struggle for the very survival of democracy in our time. As always, please be reminded that while it is not necessary to follow the links in this article to understand what I’ve written, your comprehension of the work will be greatly improved by doing so.