RSS

ANOTHER PRE-ELECTION AND EXIT POLL ANOMALY: WHEN DID VOTERS DECIDE WHO TO VOTE FOR?

08 Jan

Richard Charnin
Jan. 8, 2017

77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Poll
LINKS TO  POSTS

The National Exit Poll (which is ALWAYS adjusted to match the recorded vote) indicates that 26% of voters decided who to vote for after Oct. 1. Of these late deciders, 48% said they voted for Trump and 40% for Clinton. Of those who decided before Oct. 1, Clinton led by 51-45% – a 14% flip in vote margin.

In the 28 states that were exit polled (and forced to match the recorded vote) 51% of respondents who decided after Oct. 1 voted for Trump and 41% for Clinton. Of those who decided before Oct. 1, Clinton led by 52-44%, an 18% flip in vote margin.

The momentum was clearly in favor of Trump. So how do you explain the large difference in margins between the pre-election polls vs. the exit polls?

According to Real Clear Politics, 45.4% of those polled after Oct. 1 said they would vote for Clinton and 40.7% for Trump. Of those polled before Oct. 1, 42.4% said they would vote for Clinton and 39.2% for Trump – a net 1.5% discrepancy.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1R9Y3ae2uyW8SUxVUnnOt9ZyvheAxa0fAhesAw_nhciM/edit#gid=1036252757

Decided after Oct.1     Decided Before Oct. 1  
    Clinton Trump Margin Clinton Trump Margin
  Real Clear Politics 45.4% 40.7% -4.7% 42.4% 39.2% -3.2%
  National Exit Poll 40% 48% 8% 51% 45% -6%
  Decided after Oct.1   Decided before Oct 1  
  Clinton Trump Margin Clinton Trump Margin
Avg 25.6% 38.1% 50.5% 12.4% 49.4% 37.0% -12.4%
Wtd 25.6% 40.7% 50.8% 10.0% 52.3% 44.1% -8.2%
OH 25% 37% 54% 17% 47% 50% 3%
NC 25% 33% 57% 24% 51% 47% -4%
NJ 25% 50% 41% -9% 55% 43% -12%
PA 24% 43% 49% 6% 47% 51% 4%
MI 26% 37% 52% 15% 50% 47% -3%
MO 29% 36% 52% 16% 38% 59% 21%
IA 26% 35% 53% 18% 47% 47% 0%
FL 26% 43% 50% 7% 49% 49% 0%
WI 14% 30% 59% 29% 49% 47% -2%
VA 23% 42% 48% 6% 52% 44% -8%
NV 11% 45% 40% -5% 49% 44% -5%
NH 29% 42% 50% 8% 51% 45% -6%
MN 29% 33% 51% 18% 51% 41% -10%
ME 31% 35% 51% 16% 51% 43% -8%
CO 22% 37% 48% 11% 52% 42% -10%
TX 24% 46% 47% 1% 44% 51% 7%
IL 30% 34% 71% 37% 66% 32% -34%
CA 29% 51% 42% -9% 67% 29% -38%
NY 26% 38% 60% 22% 67% 31% -36%
GA 20% 47% 55% 8% 45% 53% 8%
AZ 25% 40% 48% 8% 48% 48% 0%
WA 22% 46% 41% -5% 57% 38% -19%
UT 44% 17% 39% 22% 36% 52% 16%
SC 26% 39% 50% 11% 42% 56% 14%
KY 28% 27% 63% 36% 31% 67% 36%
OR 20% 32% 48% 16% 54% 38% -16%
NM 28% 37% 41% 4% 52% 40% -12%
IN 29% 34% 53% 19% 35% 61% 26%
Advertisements
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 8, 2017 in Uncategorized

 

Tags: , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Richard Charnin's Blog

JFK Conspiracy and Systemic Election Fraud Analysis

%d bloggers like this: