2016 True Vote Models in Confirmation: Party-ID and Returning 2012 Voters

Richard Charnin

Aug.28, 2017

**77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud**

**Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts**

**Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Exit Poll**

**Reclaiming Science: The JFK Conspiracy**

**LINKS TO POSTS**

**Last 3 Elections: Exact Forecast of Electoral Vote**

Pollsters no longer ask the question “How did you vote in the last election”? Why? Because posing the question provides an analyst with data to indicate election fraud.

In 1972, 1988, 1992, 2004 and 2008, in order to match the recorded vote (SOP), the exit pollsters (who work for the MSM) required a greater turnout of Bush voters from the prior election than were still alive. This is a MATHEMATICAL IMPOSSIBILITY. If the exit poll is impossible, the recorded vote it was forced to match must also be impossible. That is proof of fraud. It’s why the exit pollsters (the MSM) no longer ask the question “Who Did You Vote for in the Last Election”?

These 2016 models calculate a true vote estimate for each state.

Model 1: Obama and Romney voter turnout in 2016.

Model 2: Gallup Party-ID voter affiliation. Used in the 2016 forecast model.

Base case vote shares were identical in each model. The shares were forced to match the recorded vote assuming equal 95% turnout. To calculate the True Vote, returning Obama voter turnout in 2016 was adjusted to 89%. The assumption is that 6% of Obama voters were Bernie Sanders 2016 primary voters who did not return to vote in the presidential election.

*Important note: Since the vote shares were forced to match a likely fraudulent recorded vote (the Mainstream Media was heavily biased for Clinton), the following results are conservative. Trump probably did at least 2% better than indicated in the base case calculations. View the sensitivity analysis.*

So how can we determine Obama and Romney returning voter turnout in 2016? Where can we get that information? Why don’t the exit pollsters provide the data? Should we just guess or estimate turnout based on historical elections? I chose the latter.

Using the prior 2012 vote as a basis, a voter mortality estimate is factored in. Approximately 4% of voters pass between each election (1% annual mortality). The simplest approach is to assume an equal 95% turnout of Obama and Romney voters still living. Now we have a plausible approximation of the (unknown) mix of returning voters. Since we know the current election recorded vote, the number of new 2016 voters who did not vote in 2012 can be calculated: DNV = 2016 total vote – returning 2012 voters.

The first step is to force the candidate shares of returning voters to match the recorded vote assuming equal 95% turnout.

In the True Vote calculation, the percentage of returning Obama voters was lowered to 89% to reflect disenchantment among Bernie Sanders’ primary voters who did not vote in the general election or voted for Jill Stein or Donald Trump.

To view the sensitivity of the True Vote to Trump shares of returning Obama and Romney voters, a matrix of total vote shares is calculated in 1% increments around the Trump base case estimate. There are 25 vote share scenario combinations in the 5×5 matrix. Corresponding matrices of Clinton shares and vote margins are also included. The base case is in the central cell.

**2016 Presidential State Election Model Summary**

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10dlTnin814phKJWjYdkG-ujNKak3zo6ywIP0u0-TGFg/edit#gid=667189511

Recorded Vote

Clinton: 48.25-46.17% (2.83 million votes)

Trump: 306 Electoral Votes

Model 1

(returning 2012 voters)

2012 recorded vote: Obama 51.03-Romney 47.19% (4.98 million)

2016 voter turnout: Obama 89%, Romney 95%

Trump: 47.8-46.7% (1.51 million votes)

Trump: 323 Electoral Votes

Model 2

Gallup National Voter Affiliation Survey: 32D-28R-40I (state adjusted)

1. Trump and Clinton split the undecided vote:

Trump: 46.8-45.8% (1.35 million votes)

Trump: 307 Electoral Votes

2. Trump had 75% of the undecided vote:

Trump: 48.1-44.5% (4.97 million votes)

Trump: 352 Electoral Votes

**The National Model**

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10dlTnin814phKJWjYdkG-ujNKak3zo6ywIP0u0-TGFg/edit#gid=1768941212

**Vote share sensitivity analysis (Model 1)**

-Best case: Trump had 92% of returning Romney voters and 9% of Obama voters

Trump by 49.4-45.0% (5.98 million votes)

-Base case: Trump had 90% of returning Romney voters and 7% of Obama voters

Trump by 47.8-46.7% (1.51 million votes)

-Worst case: Trump had 88% of returning Romney voters and 5% of Obama voters

Clinton by 48.3-46.1% (2.97 million votes).

**Mathematical Proof: the 2004 election was stolen**

The 2004 National Exit Poll was impossible as it was forced to match the recorded vote (Bush 50.7-48.3%) using an impossible number of returning Bush 2000 voters. It indicated that 52.6 million (43% of the 2004 electorate) were returning Bush 2000 voters and just 45.3 million (37%) were returning Gore voters. But Bush had just 50.5 million recorded votes in 2000. It indicated an impossible 110% turnout of living 2000 Bush voters in 2004.

2004 Election Fraud

https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2015/10/30/2004-election-fraud-overwhelming-statistical-proof-that-it-was-stolen/

2004 Spreadsheet 1

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjAk1JUWDMyRdFIzSTJtMTJZekNBWUdtbWp3bHlpWGc&usp=sheets_web#gid=7

2004 Spreadsheet 2

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1x2WCPJautd_eZPIfkmW9W9vD2p1Zu0ZlvgqV_gUwLNM/edit#gid=13

Nathan Gant

November 9, 2017 at 9:26 am

Have you’ve had a chance to look at the recent (2017) Virginia voting results? Electronic vote machines (WINVote) were decertified in the state, starting in 2015. It seems that Virginia’s Board of Elections had just decertified all DRE’s and electronic voting machines. Dems are getting their edge back with the paper ballots.

Most EU countries don’t allow electronic voting. I would think Russia hacking might be one incentive to stick with traditional hand counts with paper trails. To say nothing of insider or domestic-based manipulation. Why isn’t this considered a national security threat of the highest level, it’s beyond me.

Richard Charnin

November 11, 2017 at 3:42 pm

There was no Russian hacking! Do your homework and ignore the MSM