RSS

My reply to an Amazon reviewer of “Trump Won the True Vote”

02 Jan

Richard Charnin
Jan.2, 2020

LINKS TO  BLOG POSTS

Amazon deleted< my reply to Mike Landau,  a reviewer of “Trump Won the True Vote”. He questioned my credibility and motivation in my analysis of the 2016 election. https://www.amazon.com/Trump-Won-True-Vote-Independents/dp/1979900973/

Landau wrote:
Mr. Charnin has written several interesting books previously building on the fact that over the last 30 years, since widespread adoption of proprietary voting machines operated by companies controlled by Republican activists, exit polls have fairly consistently differed from counted votes with exit polls roughly 4-7% more Democratic. He has come up with his own model of projection which he calls True Vote and which for the 10 years he’s been doing it has tracked closely to exit poll results, so he argues for consistent tabulation [and other] fraud in favor of republicans.

In this book, however, though again in the 2016 election exit polls were again much higher Dem than official counts, such that if accurate Clinton won handily, Mr. Charnin suddenly renounces the likely accuracy of exit polls he’s been touting for years, apparently because he’s become a Trump supporter in distaste at H CLinton’s unfair treatment of bernie sanders, and suddenly switches to a claim the vote count was several % skewed toward the democrats! In doing so he makes a number of false claims, including that millions of illegal aliens were allowed to vote for Dems, that the establishment favored Clinton [Rep. establishment solidly was behind Trump], and that George Soros now controls voting machine companies – this an apparent reference to a false right-wing conspiracy theory debunked on Snopes and elsewhere, that he now runs SmartMatic – in fact, voting machine companies are still controlled by activist Republicans. Charnin’s exit poll data is still of interest, but his descent into right-wing conspiracy and abandonment of his previous belief in exit polls, show a sad eagerness to adjust his results to his preferences, which must call into some question all of his earlier works – which are still recommended, though with this caveat.

My response:
Landau is wrong about
1) Snopes being impartial.Their reputation was shattered a long time ago. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2016/12/22/the-daily-mail-snopes-story-and-fact-checking-the-fact-checkers/#4fdaf2fe227f
2) Soros not having an interest in voting machines in 16 states. https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/mb4ezy/top-voting-machine-vendor-admits-it-installed-remote-access-software-on-systems-sold-to-states
3) illegal voters not coming out in millions for Clinton. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driver%27s_licenses_for_illegal_immigrants_in_the_United_States
4) Claiming that I descended into a RW conspiracy. That is a TELL.
5) Claiming the establishment favored Trump. That is delusional.

My analysis shows that in 2016, exit pollster Edison Research(which is funded by the National Election Pool of six media giants} adjusted the polls for Clinton. The MSM will do ANYTHING to destroy Trump  Pundits like Landau have a closed mind and don’t have a clue about mathematical election modeling.

My posts and four election fraud books are all based on a thorough, fair analysis. In 2016, HRC stole the primaries from Bernie Sanders. I wrote “77 Billion to One”, which was largely based on a) deviations of unadjusted state and national exit polls from the recorded vote and b) Cumulative Vote Share Analysis. Even the DNC lawyers admitted the fraud. The DNC/establishment could not let Clinton lose the unadjusted exit polls in the presidential election.

THE MSM INFLATED THE UNADJUSTED EXIT POLLS FOR CLINTON AND THEN ADJUSTED THEM TO MATCH A  FRAUDULENT RECORDED VOTE COUNT (IT IS STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE). THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT I SAID THEY WOULD DO IN MY PRE-ELECTION TRUE VOTE ANALYSIS.

Just because the National Election Pool (NEP) of six media giants provided accurate exit polls in PRIOR ELECTIONS UP TO AND INCLUDING THE 2016 PRIMARY does not mean they were not biased in the 2016 presidential. The establishment (MSM) wanted HRC to win come hell or high water. We are by now quite familiar with the Deep State/Mainstream Media conspiracy to (a) keep Trump from winning the election and (b) supporting a bogus impeachment to try and defeat him in 2020. THEREFORE IT IS LOGICAL THAT THE MSM WOULD RIG PRE-ELECTION AND EXIT POLLS IN FAVOR OF CLINTON. THAT IS JUST COMMON SENSE.

NOW WILL LANDAU USE CRITICAL THINKING AND TURN OFF RACHEL MADDOW? THE MSM WILL GO TO ANY EXTREME TO DESTROY TRUMP WHICH THEY VOWED TO DO THE DAY HE WAS INAUGURATED.

NO ONE SHOULD EVER ACCUSE ME OF ADJUSTING MY ANALYSIS TO PERSONAL PREFERENCES. I HAVE THREE DEGREES IN APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND WORKED IN THE DEFENSE INDUSTRY AND WALL STREET INVESTMENT BANKING DEVELOPING MATH-BASED ANALYTICAL PROGRAMMING MODELS. COMMENTS ON MY MOTIVATIONS ARE UNCALLED FOR. TRUTH IS ALL.

2016 Election Model
href=”https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1R9Y3ae2uyW8SUxVUnnOt9ZyvheAxa0fAhesAw_nhciM/edit#gid=1036175945&#8243;

 
7 Comments

Posted by on January 2, 2020 in Uncategorized

 

7 responses to “My reply to an Amazon reviewer of “Trump Won the True Vote”

  1. josef

    February 4, 2020 at 4:02 am

    Excellent, Richard! There so many partisan brain washed puppets out there that is terrifying. I’ve followed you since 2015 with Debbie from Sane Progressive and you’ve always been spot on and go where the data and math leads. I’ve shared your data many places and those that refute the math will site Snopes or some other deep site propaganda outlet. Funny they are now calling you a ‘right wing conspiracy theorist’ 🤣 Did people just think Hillary/deep state would stop rigging in the general election after she literally got away with murder of Seth Rich and then blamed Russia for it?

    I can’t wait to see your analysis for this coming election and the seemingly rigged Iowa Caucus tonight. Thanks for all your great services!

     
  2. Richard Charnin

    February 9, 2020 at 1:41 pm

    probably…

     
  3. Sam A

    February 9, 2020 at 4:45 pm

    ‘Yeah, good. OK’ : -)

     
  4. MAL

    March 27, 2020 at 12:54 pm

    Mr. Charnin, I am glad to see that someone is examining the question of election fraud carefully. However, I am confused as to why the permitting of people to get driver’s licenses without proof of citizenship leads to the claim that 3 million people illegally voted in the 2016 election. First, don’t states require more than a driver’s license to register to vote, which is a separate process from getting a driver’s license in almost every state? Second, even if a potential loophole exists in some states that would allow non-citizens to vote without showing proof of citizenship, where does the claim of 3 million illegal voters come from? Thank you in advance for your reply.

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: