Navarro Report Volume 3: Yes, President Trump WON – The Case, Evidence, & Statistical Receipts

15 Jan

Richard Charnin Jan. 15, 2020


This third installment of Navarro’s report provides investigators with up-to-date statistical “receipts” and a well-documented tally of potentially illegal votes on a state-by-state and category-by-category basis. Source:

Volume 3 provides a scholarly rendering of the potential number of illegal votes in the 2020 election. Peter Navarro welcomes anyone who wishes to dispute its findings “because that is the nature of scholarly discourse.”

Note: The above table does not include 1) estimated 2.5% machine vote flipping from Trump to Biden, 2) Dr. Epstein’s estimate that 6-10% of Trump voters flipped to Biden from the propaganda effect of Google algorithms which favored Biden, and 3) a survey which found that 7% of Biden voters would have voted for Trump if they knew about the Biden scandals.

Model 1: cell A95

Model 2: cell M8

Illegal voters, Biden margin, Trump margin – Election models 1&2

Illegal votes255601447220992554
Biden margin1012155348221
Trump Model 1490751563217812405
Trump Model 25928798552201,164566

Posted by on January 15, 2021 in Uncategorized


14 responses to “Navarro Report Volume 3: Yes, President Trump WON – The Case, Evidence, & Statistical Receipts

  1. eklavyaartist

    January 15, 2021 at 7:26 am

    Navarro says that the Democratic Party and its operatives stole the 1960 presidential election. I wonder whether you agree with the charge?

    • Richard Charnin

      January 15, 2021 at 7:50 am

      No. That is a myth. There were at least 6 million uncounted votes with 75% to JFK, the challenger. Chicago voted heavily for JFK, as expected. But Repubs stole votes in southern IL. In Texas, hispanics and blacks for JFK were disenfranchised. And Nixon barely won CA by 35,000 votes: 3,259,722 (50.10%) – 3,224,099 (49.55%) ? How many minority votes were uncounted?

      • eklavyaartist

        January 15, 2021 at 10:41 pm

        I see. You don’t endorse all of Navarro’s claims.

  2. Patricia

    January 15, 2021 at 4:07 pm

    Biden ,should be arrested

  3. eklavyaartist

    January 15, 2021 at 10:43 pm

    While these analyses clearly establish that Biden’s victory is illegitimate, the strength of the conclusion would be better if battleground states won by Trump – Texas, Iowa, North Carolina, Florida – were analyzed too. If illegal-votes-more-than-margin were only found in Biden won states that would prove that the election was rigged by the Democrats.

  4. eklavyaartist

    January 16, 2021 at 3:54 am

    Interesting graph. But what does ‘ghost voters’ mean, separate from ‘non-registered voters’, ‘voting machine irregularities’.? Also, how are overvotes suspicious? There are overvotes in any election – as you know very well. Infact, the voter intention cannot be clearly accessed in an overvote – and thus they cannot be counted.
    While defending the Truth – that Trump won – we should not stoop to deception.

    • eklavyaartist

      January 16, 2021 at 3:55 am

      *I meant table, actually. Not graph.

    • Richard Charnin

      January 17, 2021 at 12:47 am

      You are implying deception? Your days posting here are coming to an end.

      • eklavyaartist

        January 17, 2021 at 3:25 am

        Deception by Navarro. For example, the entry for Nevada in ‘Signature Matching Error’ is 130000. So I checked his report. 130000 is not the number of signatures on absentee ballots not matched, but the number of signatures matched by a machine. Signature matched by machine is not ‘signature matching error’.

      • Richard Charnin

        January 17, 2021 at 7:53 am

        I suggest you contact Navarro with all of your comments.

      • Richard Charnin

        January 17, 2021 at 8:07 am

        No deception by Navarro. He states that Agilis used machines for signature matching, which was illegal. You are reaching. I smell an agenda. You are nitpicking. It was a great analysis/report. Don’t bother to comment further. I do not appreciate tedious, interminable discussions.

      • eklavyaartist

        January 17, 2021 at 3:27 am

        Similarly, as I pointed out, overvotes do not belong in this table. Overvotes are not legitimate votes in our one-vote-per-office system. If a voter has apparently voted for 2 candidates, he has voted for none.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: