Richard Charnin Feb.5, 2021
How do votes disappear? The NY Times PA data timeline shows Trump losing votes. But the Times says do not believe your lying eyes; there was no election fraud. A statistical analysis of New York Times data in Philadelphia claims a suspicious string of voting “ratios” benefiting Biden, as also happened in Georgia.
By 11pm Election Day, Trump was leading Biden by about 285,000 votes. Then, 347,768 votes from somewhere dumped into the system in 44 batches in increments of approximately 6,000, 12,000, or 18,000 additional net votes for Biden. As a result, Biden came back from an election night deficit of 285,000 to a 46,000 vote win four days later. https://centralcitynews.us/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Central-City-News-11-19-20-Small.pdf
The NY Times GA data timeline also shows Trump losing votes. But the Times says do not believe your lying eyes; there was no election fraud. Statistical analysis shows Biden pulling from behind in improbably consistent increments in Georgia and other states.
“On Wednesday, Nov. 4, the New York Times reported President Trump was leading in Georgia by 103,997 votes. Then the Times’ continuous voting updates showed ballots arriving for Biden in multiples of 4,800 votes over and over again. In some vote dumps, the President actually lost votes.” This continued until Biden pulled ahead by almost exactly 1,000 votes, gaining 104,984 votes in multiples of 4,800.
February 11, 2021 at 2:34 am
‘The immediate problem here is that it’s ignoring losses for Biden when Trump gained votes. If we calculate those, we have a loss of 25,712 for Biden, not really changing things.
But what if we add up ANY decline? After all a decrease in your votes is an anomaly, it does not really matter if it happens simultaneously with a rise in your opponent’s votes. If we add up ALL the declines in the Pennsylvania data, we have: Trump Lost = -408547 and Biden Lost = -637917. So adjustment down hurt Biden more than Trump.’
Is that true? What am I missing?
February 13, 2021 at 11:59 pm
What are you missing? You don’t believe your lying eyes. You are oblivious to facts. You are a royal pain in the butt. You suffer from TDS. You are a fraud. That’s what you are missing, but which other viewers of this blog see clearly. After this I will delete EVERY comment you make here.
February 14, 2021 at 4:11 am
The problem is that disappearing votes caused a net loss of 230000 votes for Biden. If disappearing votes is evidence for election fraud, then fraud against Biden was more than fraud against Trump.
I don’t have TDS. Trump was successful on economy and jobs. He took the highly important decision of standing up against China and Iran. I believe that Structural Racism is a myth.
April 23, 2021 at 11:37 pm
I came on to your blog to ask you about the NYT/Edison Data. What a coincidence! Some of the vote losses that happen are during certain updates due to the vote percentage dropping 0.1% when it has been rounded down and the votes added were less than 0.1% of the candidates vote totals. Vote %s are only carried out to one significant digit. However there were drops larger than this as well as the total number of combined votes dropping which should never happen. There is some fine analysis done (I believe) using the NYT/Edison Data. Can find it in link at bottom.
About the analysis in the below link.
What I want to know is: 1.) Why are decimals being used in all the vote totals? (Not shown in your pic above but the link below has it.)
2.) On that page is a spreadsheet, in the far right columns Q and T, why is it in nearly every state that after awhile the vote percentage for almost every update are fixed at a certain % for each candidate?
3.) How is it possible for a candidate to get more than 100% of the total votes in an update or both candidates to combine for more than 100% of the update total? It isn’t. There are several updates where Biden gets more than 100% of the vote update. Always Biden.
I believe these to be stolen votes from President Trump and also votes stolen from Jorgensen. Votes were taken from one candidate then “laundered” through the other candidate then given to Biden. In every instance he benefited. Although Jorgensen’s totals aren’t in the data I have seen solid proof of this occurring elsewhere.
Lastly, some have said that the NYT/Edison data isn’t the real tally. It’s just an approximation of vote totals (Not buying that) and those drops are just “corrections”. The latter part is true in some cases. But again why decimals at all?
The NYT says their data only uses integers (should be ‘whole numbers’ since integers include negative numbers) and don’t know where the decimals came from.