Nov. 13, 2017
77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Poll
LINKS TO POSTS
The mainstream media pundits claim that Clinton won the primary and presidential election by three million votes. It’s a myth. The pundits fail to consider the FACT that the recorded vote is ALWAYS fraudulent. A True Vote Model analysis indicates Trump won the popular as well as the electoral vote.
The pundits always assume that the recorded vote is accurate but never consider the fraud factor. The historical statistical evidence is conclusive: every election is fraudulent. The recorded vote is NEVER equal to the true vote.
The establishment-dominated media was in the tank for Hillary Clinton in the primary and general elections.
The claim that Clinton won the popular vote is quoted ad nauseam in the media, academia and by corrupt politicians. They persist in promoting the fully discredited meme of Russian “hackers” stealing the election from Clinton. But there is not one iota of proof. The Russians had nothing to do with it. Included in the appendix are two memos from the Veteran Intelligence Professional for Sanity (VIPS) to Obama and Trump which prove that the Russians did not hack the vote. Election Fraud is always an inside job.
Sanders and Trump drew much larger crowds than Clinton. They won the unscientific online polls by large margins. Trump’s Republican base was solid. Clinton’s Democratic base was fractured by defecting Sanders voters.
Millions of Sanders primary voters stayed home or voted for Jill Stein or Donald Trump. Trump won Independents by a solid majority (at least 8% higher than Clinton). There was a surge of late deciders to Trump after Labor Day.
Former interim Democratic National Committee chairwoman Donna Brazile delivered a bombshell in her new book “Hacked”. She claimed that the Hillary Clinton campaign seized control of the Democratic Party as far back as August 2015. Well, this was not a bombshell to researchers who have claimed that the primary was rigged from Day One.
In 77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud, I provided mathematical evidence that the primary was rigged for Clinton. The exit poll discrepancies were in one direction only: they showed that Sanders did consistently better in the polls than the recorded vote. It was solid proof that the primaries were rigged.
But just because the unadjusted exit polls were quite accurate in prior elections and the 2016 primary does not mean they were in the presidential election.
The six media corporations (the National Election Pool) who fund exit pollster Edison Research had to show that Clinton won the unadjusted polls to support her win of the bogus recorded popular vote.
My Election Model forecast that Trump would win 306 recorded electoral votes was based on adjustments to nine final pre-election polls. The forecast indicated that he would have 350 True EV in a fraud-free election.
The 2008, 2012, 2016 pre-election models exactly forecast the recorded electoral votes.
In 2016, Democratic Party-ID was over-weighted in the pre-election and exit polls at the expense of Independents. But a post-election exit poll analysis based on Gallup-adjusted voter affiliation confirmed the forecast model in which Trump did much better than the unadjusted exit polls indicated. The Gallup national voter affiliation survey showed that Independents comprised 41% of the electorate on Election Day, along with 31% Democrats and 28% Republicans.
Analysis of presidential elections from 1988-2008 indicated that exit poll discrepancies (“red-shift”) favored Republican candidates in every election. The accuracy of unadjusted exit polls was confirmed using True Vote Models. But the models could not confirm the unadjusted polls in 2016.
What if the pollsters had to show that Clinton won the exit polls to cover up that she rigged the election? Since the exit posters always force state and national unadjusted exit polls to match the bogus recorded vote, why trust them to do unbiased polling in the general election? They never provide precincts polled and actual respondent data. To assume that the unadjusted exit polls were pristine in 2016 just because they were fairly accurate in prior elections is not logical.