Comments for Richard Charnin's Blog
https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com
JFK Conspiracy and Systemic Election Fraud AnalysisFri, 15 Sep 2017 22:55:38 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.com/Comment on About Me by Richard Charnin
https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/about/#comment-19015
Fri, 15 Sep 2017 22:55:38 +0000http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/?page_id=2#comment-19015I’m sure you can find them with google.
]]>Comment on Probability Analysis of Unlikely Historical Events by Richard Charnin
https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2017/07/14/probability-analysis-of-unlikely-historical-events/#comment-19014
Fri, 15 Sep 2017 22:42:54 +0000http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/?p=22613#comment-19014Check out this: https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2017/05/20/quick-mortality-probability-calculator/
]]>Comment on Probability Analysis of Unlikely Historical Events by Kevin Trye
https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2017/07/14/probability-analysis-of-unlikely-historical-events/#comment-18964
Thu, 14 Sep 2017 23:45:56 +0000http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/?p=22613#comment-18964I noted you missed the Clinton-related homicides. Are they not significant or is this just a conspiracy?
]]>Comment on 2016 Pre-election Model – Calculating the Expected Electoral Vote by Richard Charnin
https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2017/08/29/2016-pre-election-model-calculating-the-expected-electoral-vote/#comment-18817
Tue, 12 Sep 2017 05:02:35 +0000http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/?p=22896#comment-18817No, I have not. I am not aware of evidence to suggest that Benson’s Law detects fraud.

]]>Comment on JFK Assassination: Mathematical Proof of a Grassy Knoll Shooter by Jeffrey Liakos
https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2014/02/05/jfk-assassination-mathematical-proof-of-a-grassy-knoll-shooter/#comment-18736
Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:56:04 +0000http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/?p=9592#comment-18736Gerry Simone, yes, you did. What are your views regarding the conspiracy theories surrounding assassination of John F. Kennedy? Any legitimacy to them or just a bunch of nonsense in an attempt to do a disservice to the memory of John F. Kennedy?
]]>Comment on JFK Assassination: Mathematical Proof that the Zapruder film was Altered by John Sarviss
https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2014/02/04/jfk-assassination-mathematical-proof-that-the-zapruder-film-was-altered/#comment-18705
Sun, 10 Sep 2017 03:24:08 +0000http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/?p=9572#comment-18705Leaves out only one really important thing. The use of suppressors. South Knoll folks. All they heard was the bullet breaking the sound barrier. Mitch Werbell’s suppressors been around since 1960 and his manual on the use of them speaks to that very same phenomenon.http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/2359-our-man-in-powder-springs-mitch-werbell/
]]>Comment on JFK Assassination: Mathematical Proof of a Grassy Knoll Shooter by Gerry Simone
https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2014/02/05/jfk-assassination-mathematical-proof-of-a-grassy-knoll-shooter/#comment-18683
Sat, 09 Sep 2017 21:16:05 +0000http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/?p=9592#comment-18683I’ve studied the Zapruder film in various formats including slow motion and frame by frame, yes. All I’m saying is that one can’t discern a fwd head movement in a 1/18th second frame with the naked eye and the film played at normal speed.

Did I answer your question?

]]>Comment on JFK Assassination: Mathematical Proof of a Grassy Knoll Shooter by Jeffrey Liakos
https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2014/02/05/jfk-assassination-mathematical-proof-of-a-grassy-knoll-shooter/#comment-18679
Sat, 09 Sep 2017 20:59:08 +0000http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/?p=9592#comment-18679Gerry Simone, based on your response, I assume you saw video footage?
]]>Comment on JFK Assassination: Mathematical Proof of a Grassy Knoll Shooter by Gerry Simone
https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2014/02/05/jfk-assassination-mathematical-proof-of-a-grassy-knoll-shooter/#comment-18634
Sat, 09 Sep 2017 02:59:36 +0000http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/?p=9592#comment-18634@ Jeffrey Liakos, Nobody can watch the Z film and see JFK’s head move forward as you described. It was only by a frame by frame analysis, that his head ***appears*** to move forward from Z-312 to Z-313. I say “appears” because later analysis by David Wimp and a presentation by Dr. Josiah Thompson (Tink) at the JFK Lancer Conference in 2013, shows that the forward movement was the result of an optical illusion caused by blurring from panning or a jiggle. However, we know there were shots from both directions simply because of the back wounds of JFK and Connally, and the shot(s) from the front and the resulting reaction. Tink also showed that there was a shot that was fired circa Z-326 from behind to have struck JFK in the head, which caused the windshield to bellow when struck by the exiting bullet or fragment (you can actually see the sunlight off the windshield momentarily blur).

(Sorry to digress Richard)

]]>Comment on 2016 Pre-election Model – Calculating the Expected Electoral Vote by John Kesich
https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2017/08/29/2016-pre-election-model-calculating-the-expected-electoral-vote/#comment-18568
Thu, 07 Sep 2017 22:58:12 +0000http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/?p=22896#comment-18568Have you applied Benford’s law to election data to detect potential fraud? Any thoughts on this approach?
]]>