Clinton rigged the primary against Sanders, and then she rigged the presidential.

Richard Charnin
June 23, 2018

Clinton rigged the primary against Sanders-  and then she rigged the presidential. The MSM was in the tank for HRC.  In the presidential election, Clinton’s pre-election and unadjusted exit poll vote shares were inflated in anticipation of the fraud.

http://projectcensored.org/clintonistasdnc-illegally-stole-democratic-primaries-bernie-sanders/

“Finally, almost all election ballots are counted by computers and cannot be verified by the public. Apart from being non-transparent, this method of counting ballots is also problematic because electronic voting machines can easily be hacked. Essentially, Clintonista computer hackers could have flipped a minimum number of votes spread over a maximum number of polling stations by inserting a malicious code or algorithm into the voting tabulation software. As a result, this code would allow the final number of votes to “remain random in a way that would avoid detection by election fraud analysis tools.”

Suspiciously, multiple studies show that across all primary states, Clinton performed best in counties with electronic voting machines that didn’t leave a paper trail. https://www.theepochtimes.com/voting-machines-in-16-states-tied-to-george-soros-ally_2176907.html

Additionally, Election Justice USA found that the computer counts differed widely from the exit poll projections, but only for the Democratic Party primaries. According to election analyst Richard Charnin, Bernie Sanders’ exit poll share exceeded his recorded vote share by greater than the margin of error in 11 of 26 primaries: Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Massachusetts, New York, Ohio, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, Wisconsin, and West Virginia. Charnin reported that the probability of this occurring is 1 in 77 billion, which raises the strong possibility of election fraud. Yet, almost no discrepancies were found in the data for the Republican Party primaries. This is particularly remarkable, because the exit polls were conducted on the same day, in the same precincts, with the same interviewers, and used the same methodologies for both the parties. So, this evidence suggests that the computer counts were only accurate for the Republican Party, while the computer counts for the Democratic Party primaries remain largely unverified.

The exit polls for the Democratic primaries were conducted by Edison Research, which is the exclusive provider of exit polls to the National Election Pool (NEP), which includes ABC, CBS, CNN, FOX, NBC and the Associated Press. The National Election Pool has a policy that exit pollsters must adjust and force all state and national exit polls to match the recorded vote count, as if the computerized votes are always correct and as if there is no fraud!”

https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2018/04/05/23743/

My Books
Trump Won the True Vote: Polling Anomalies, Democratic Defections, Independents and Late Undecided Voters
77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Exit Poll
Reclaiming Science: The JFK Conspiracy

 

 

MY COMMENTS TO THE MSM ON THE RIGGING OF THE 2016 PRE-ELECTION POLLS

Richard Charnin
April 24, 2017

77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Poll
LINKS TO  POSTS

The MSM just interviewed the authors of  Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign on the reasons for Clinton’s loss.  I commented to Chris Mathews and Brian Williams of MSNBC as well as FOX and CBS on how MSM pollsters rigged the pre-election polls for Clinton.

FYI: Your guests may not have looked at my 2016 Election model. It was based adjustments to final pre-election polls which were biased for Clinton. The Democratic Party-ID share was overstated at the expense of Independents who went solidly for Trump. In addition, there is strong evidence that votes were stolen from Jill Stein – by Clinton.

The 2016 Model projected Trump’s 306 RECORDED EV. But he actually had approximately 351 TRUE EV after adjusting for late undecided voters. https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2016/11/07/2016-election-model-forecast/

Recorded Vote: Clinton 48.3-46.2%, Trump 306-232 EV
Recorded Vote Forecast: Trump 44.4-42.9% with 306-232 EV
True Vote Model: Trump 48.5-44.3% with 351-187 EV

Note: I exactly forecast the RECORDED EV in the last three elections: 365, 332, 306. In each case the winner did better in the True Vote than the Recorded vote.

Here is the proof: https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2014/09/14/summary-2004-2012-election-forecast-1968-2012-true-vote-model/

 

 

 

 

ADJUSTED POLLS: VOTERS DECIDING BEFORE AND AFTER OCT.1

Richard Charnin
Updated: June 27, 2017

77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Poll
LINKS TO  POSTS

The National Exit Poll is ALWAYS adjusted to match the recorded vote. Clinton led the adjusted National Exit Poll by 48.3-46.2%.

The 2016 NEP indicates that 26% of voters decided who to vote for after Oct. 1. Of these late deciders, 48% said they voted for Trump and 40% for Clinton.

Clinton won voters who decided prior to Oct.1 by  51-45%. If  Trump actually won these voters by 47-46%, then he won the True Vote by 47.3-44.4%.

The 2016 NEP indicates that 40% of voters decided who to vote for after Sept. 1. Of these late deciders, 48% said they voted for Trump and 42% for Clinton.

Since  exit polls are always adjusted to match the fraudulent recorded vote, assuming the shares of voters who decided after Oct.1 are essentially correct, then the shares of those who decided prior to Oct.1 must have been inflated for Clinton. 

NATIONAL EXIT POLL ADJUSTED PRE OCT. 1 TO MATCH RECORDED VOTE

Decided	Voted	Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
Post Oct 1	26.0%	40.0%	48.0%	12.0%	8.0%
Pre-Oct 1	74.0%	51.0%	45.0%	4.0%	-6.0%
Match RV	100.0%	48.1%	45.8%	6.1%	-2.4%
Reported	100.0%	48.3%	46.2%	5.5%	-2.0%

NATIONAL EXIT POLL ADJUSTED PRE OCT.1 TO MATCH TRUE VOTE

Decided	Voted	Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
Post Oct 1	26.0%	40.0%	48.0%	12.0%	8.0%
Pre-Oct 1	74.0%	46.0%	47.0%	7.0%	1.0%
Match TV	100.0%	44.4%	47.3%	8.3%	2.8%
Reported	100.0%	48.2%	46.2%	5.6%	-2.0%

NATIONAL EXIT POLL ADJUSTED PRE SEPT.1 TO MATCH RECORDED VOTE

Decided	Voted	Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
Post Sep 1	40%	42.0%	48.0%	10.0%	6.0%
Pre Sep 1	60%	52.5%	45.0%	2.5%	-7.5%
Match	100.0%	48.3%	46.2%	5.5%	-2.1%
Recorded		48.3%	46.2%	5.5%	-2.1%

NATIONAL EXIT POLL ADJUSTED PRE SEPT.1 TO MATCH TRUE VOTE

Decided	Voted	Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
Post Sep 1	40%	42.0%	48.0%	10.0%	6.0%
Pre Sep 1	60%	47.0%	48.0%	5.0%	1.0%
Match True	100.0%	45.0%	48.0%	7.0%	3.0%
TRUE		45.0%	48.0%	7.0%	3.0%

According to Real Clear Politics, Clinton led the RCP average of pre-election polls after Oct. 1 by 45.4-40.7%. The National Exit Poll indicates that Trump led voters who decided after Oct.1 by 48-40%, a 12.7% margin difference between RCP and the NEP

Clinton led the RCP average of pre-election polls before Oct. 1 by 42.4-39.2%. The NEP indicates Clinton won voters who decided before Oct.1 by 51-45%, a 2.8% difference in margin between the RCP and NEP. How does one explain the large difference in margin between post-Oct.1 pre-election and exit polls compared to the pre-Oct. polls?

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1R9Y3ae2uyW8SUxVUnnOt9ZyvheAxa0fAhesAw_nhciM/edit#gid=1036252757

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1R9Y3ae2uyW8SUxVUnnOt9ZyvheAxa0fAhesAw_nhciM/pubchart?oid=729649900&format=image

Note the change in Trump’s margin after Oct. 1  in IL (57%), NY (51%),  CA (29%), OR (32%), WI (31%), MN (28%), NC (28%).

When Decided

NEP		Before Oct.1			After Oct.1		Chg
	Clinton	Trump	Margin	Clinton	Trump	Margin	Margin
Avg	49.43%	46.29%	-3.14%	39.11%	48.27%	9.16%	12.30%
WtdAv	52.31%	44.12%	-8.18%	41.19%	48.04%	6.84%	15.03%
IL	66%	32%	-34%	33.2%	53.8%	20.6%	55%
NY	67%	31%	-36%	38.4%	53.0%	14.6%	51%
IA	47%	47%	0%	26.8%	63.0%	36.2%	36%
NC	51%	47%	-4%	31.7%	58.3%	26.6%	31%
MN	51%	41%	-10%	35.3%	54.5%	19.2%	29%
CA	67%	29%	-38%	48.8%	38.0%	-10.8%	27%
OR	54%	38%	-16%	34.4%	43.5%	9.1%	25%
CO	52%	42%	-10%	34.5%	47.7%	13.2%	23%
OH	47%	50%	3%	33.2%	56.8%	23.5%	21%
NH	51%	45%	-6%	37.1%	50.6%	13.4%	19%
ME	51%	43%	-8%	40.8%	49.0%	8.3%	16%
AZ	48%	48%	0%	36.5%	50.7%	14.2%	14%
NM	52%	40%	-12%	38.6%	40.2%	1.5%	14%
MI	50%	47%	-3%	39.5%	48.9%	9.4%	12%
WA	57%	38%	-19%	46.7%	39.7%	-7.0%	12%
VA	52%	44%	-8%	42.2%	45.9%	3.6%	12%
WI	49%	47%	-2%	38.8%	47.9%	9.1%	11%
NV	50%	45%	-5%	45.4%	49.0%	3.6%	9%
TX	44%	51%	7%	40.8%	56.1%	15.3%	8%
UT	36%	52%	16%	16.6%	37.3%	20.7%	5%
FL	49%	49%	0%	44.5%	49.1%	4.6%	5%
SC	42%	56%	14%	36.9%	51.9%	15.0%	1%
NJ	55%	43%	-12%	55.0%	35.0%	-19.9%	-8%
MO	38%	59%	21%	38.5%	51.3%	12.9%	-8%
PA	47%	51%	4%	50.6%	40.9%	-9.6%	-14%
GA	45%	53%	8%	48.2%	41.9%	-6.3%	-14%
KY	31%	67%	36%	37.0%	51.0%	14.0%	-22%
IN	35%	61%	26%	45.0%	46.6%	1.5%	-24%

 

When decided	Calc match
NATIONAL	Voted	Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	26.0%	40.0%	48.0%	12.0%	8.0%
before	74.0%	51.0%	45.0%	4.0%	-6.0%
calc	100.0%	48.1%	45.8%	6.1%	-2.4%
Reported	100.0%	48.2%	46.2%	5.6%	-2.0%
WA		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	22.0%	46.0%	41.0%	13.0%	-5.0%
before	78.0%	57.0%	38.0%	5.0%	-19.0%
calc	100.0%	54.6%	38.7%	6.8%	-15.9%
Reported	100.0%	54.7%	38.4%	6.9%	-16.4%
IL		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	31.0%	33.0%	55.0%	12.0%	22.0%
before	69.0%	66.0%	32.0%	2.0%	-34.0%
calc	100.0%	55.8%	39.1%	5.1%	-16.6%
Reported	100.0%	55.8%	38.8%	5.4%	-17.1%
CA		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	29.0%	51.0%	42.0%	7.0%	-9.0%
before	71.0%	67.0%	29.0%	4.0%	-38.0%
calc	100.0%	62.4%	32.8%	4.9%	-29.6%
Reported	100.0%	61.7%	31.6%	6.7%	-30.1%
NY		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	26.0%	38.4%	53.0%	8.6%	14.6%
before	74.0%	67.0%	31.0%	2.0%	-36.0%
calc	100.0%	59.6%	36.7%	3.7%	-22.9%
Reported	100.0%	59.6%	36.7%	3.7%	-22.8%
OR		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	20.0%	32.0%	48.0%	20.0%	16.0%
before	80.0%	54.0%	38.0%	8.0%	-16.0%
calc	100.0%	49.6%	40.0%	10.4%	-9.6%
Reported	100.0%	50.1%	39.1%	10.8%	-11.0%
OH		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	25.0%	37.0%	54.0%	9.0%	17.0%
before	75.0%	47.0%	50.0%	3.0%	3.0%
calc	100.0%	44.5%	51.0%	4.5%	6.5%
Reported	100.0%	43.6%	51.7%	4.8%	8.1%
NC		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	25.0%	33.0%	57.0%	10.0%	24.0%
before	75.0%	51.0%	47.0%	2.0%	-4.0%
calc	100.0%	46.5%	49.5%	4.0%	3.0%
Reported	100.0%	46.2%	49.8%	4.0%	3.7%
NJ		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	25.0%	50.0%	41.0%	9.0%	-9.0%
before	75.0%	55.0%	43.0%	2.0%	-12.0%
calc	100.0%	53.8%	42.5%	3.7%	-11.3%
Reported	100.0%	55.0%	41.0%	4.0%	-14.0%
PA		Clinton	Trump	Other/Undec	Margin
month	24.0%	43.0%	49.0%	8.0%	6.0%
before	76.0%	47.0%	51.0%	2.0%	4.0%
calc	100.0%	46.0%	50.5%	3.4%	4.5%
Reported	100.0%	47.9%	48.6%	3.6%	0.7%
MI		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	26.0%	37.0%	52.0%	11.0%	15.0%
before	74.0%	50.0%	47.0%	3.0%	-3.0%
calc	100.0%	46.6%	48.3%	5.1%	1.7%
Reported	100.0%	47.3%	47.5%	5.2%	0.2%
MO		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	29.0%	36.0%	52.0%	12.0%	16.0%
before	71.0%	38.0%	59.0%	3.0%	21.0%
calc	100.0%	37.4%	57.0%	5.6%	19.6%
Reported	100.0%	38.1%	56.8%	5.1%	18.6%
IA		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	26.0%	35.0%	53.0%	12.0%	18.0%
before	74.0%	47.0%	47.0%	6.0%	0.0%
calc	100.0%	43.9%	48.6%	7.6%	4.7%
Reported	100.0%	41.7%	51.1%	7.1%	9.4%
FL		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	26.0%	43.0%	50.0%	7.0%	7.0%
before	74.0%	49.0%	49.0%	2.0%	0.0%
calc	100.0%	47.4%	49.3%	3.3%	1.8%
Reported	100.0%	47.8%	49.0%	3.2%	1.2%
WI		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	14.0%	30.0%	59.0%	11.0%	29.0%
before	86.0%	49.0%	47.0%	4.0%	-2.0%
calc	100.0%	46.3%	48.7%	5.0%	2.3%
Reported	100.0%	46.5%	47.2%	6.3%	0.8%
VA		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	23.0%	42.0%	48.0%	10.0%	6.0%
before	77.0%	52.0%	44.0%	4.0%	-8.0%
calc	100.0%	49.7%	44.9%	5.4%	-4.8%
Reported	100.0%	49.8%	44.4%	5.8%	-5.3%
NV		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	11.0%	45.0%	40.0%	15.0%	-5.0%
before	89.0%	49.0%	44.0%	7.0%	-5.0%
calc	100.0%	48.6%	43.6%	7.9%	-5.0%
Reported	100.0%	47.9%	45.5%	6.6%	-2.4%
NH		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	29.0%	42.0%	50.0%	8.0%	8.0%
before	71.0%	51.0%	45.0%	4.0%	-6.0%
calc	100.0%	48.4%	46.5%	5.2%	-1.9%
Reported	100.0%	47.0%	46.6%	6.4%	-0.4%
MN		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	29.0%	33.0%	51.0%	16.0%	18.0%
before	71.0%	51.0%	41.0%	8.0%	-10.0%
calc	100.0%	45.8%	43.9%	10.3%	-1.9%
Reported	100.0%	46.4%	44.9%	8.6%	-1.5%
ME		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	31.0%	35.0%	51.0%	14.0%	16.0%
before	69.0%	51.0%	43.0%	6.0%	-8.0%
calc	100.0%	46.0%	45.5%	8.5%	-0.6%
Reported	100.0%	47.8%	44.9%	7.3%	-3.0%
CO		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	22.0%	37.0%	48.0%	15.0%	11.0%
before	78.0%	52.0%	42.0%	6.0%	-10.0%
calc	100.0%	48.7%	43.3%	8.0%	-5.4%
Reported	100.0%	48.2%	43.3%	8.6%	-4.9%
TX		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	24.0%	46.0%	47.0%	7.0%	1.0%
before	76.0%	44.0%	51.0%	5.0%	7.0%
calc	100.0%	44.5%	50.0%	5.5%	5.6%
Reported	100.0%	43.2%	52.2%	4.5%	9.0%
GA		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	20.0%	47.0%	55.0%	-2.0%	8.0%
before	80.0%	45.0%	53.0%	2.0%	8.0%
calc	100.0%	45.4%	53.4%	1.2%	8.0%
Reported	100.0%	45.6%	50.8%	3.6%	5.1%
UT		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	44.0%	17.0%	39.0%	44.0%	22.0%
before	56.0%	36.0%	52.0%	12.0%	16.0%
calc	100.0%	27.6%	46.3%	26.1%	18.6%
Reported	100.0%	27.5%	45.5%	27.0%	18.1%
SC		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	26.0%	39.0%	50.0%	11.0%	11.0%
before	74.0%	42.0%	56.0%	2.0%	14.0%
calc	100.0%	41.2%	54.4%	4.3%	13.2%
Reported	100.0%	40.7%	54.9%	4.4%	14.3%
KY		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	28.0%	27.0%	63.0%	10.0%	36.0%
before	72.0%	31.0%	67.0%	2.0%	36.0%
calc	100.0%	29.9%	65.9%	4.2%	36.0%
Reported	100.0%	32.7%	62.5%	4.8%	29.8%
NM		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	28.0%	37.0%	41.0%	22.0%	4.0%
before	72.0%	52.0%	40.0%	8.0%	-12.0%
calc	100.0%	47.8%	40.3%	11.9%	-7.5%
Reported	100.0%	48.3%	40.0%	11.7%	-8.2%
IN		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	29.0%	34.0%	53.0%	13.0%	19.0%
before	71.0%	35.0%	61.0%	4.0%	26.0%
calc	100.0%	34.7%	58.7%	6.6%	24.0%
Reported	100.0%	37.9%	56.8%	5.3%	18.9%
AZ		Clinton	Trump	Other	Margin
month	25.0%	40.0%	48.0%	12.0%	8.0%
before	75.0%	48.0%	48.0%	4.0%	0.0%
calc	100.0%	46.0%	48.0%	6.0%	2.0%
Reported	100.0%	45.1%	48.7%	6.2%	3.5%

 

Why the 2016 pre-election polls, unadjusted exit polls and recorded vote are all wrong

Richard Charnin
Dec.30, 2016

77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud
Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Poll
LINKS TO  POSTS

The 2016 election was different in kind from prior elections; the Democrat was the establishment candidate. It was established beyond a reasonable doubt that the primaries were stolen from Bernie Sanders by the DNC which colluded with the media.

Some analysts claim that the 2016 unadjusted state exit polls prove that the election was rigged for Trump. But just because the polls were excellent indicators of the True Vote in the past does not prove that they were accurate in 2016. 

Are we supposed to believe that the MSM would not rig the unadjusted exit polls to match the rigged  pre-election polls  to make it appear that Clinton was the winner?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1R9Y3ae2uyW8SUxVUnnOt9ZyvheAxa0fAhesAw_nhciM/edit#gid=0
http://www.inquisitr.com/3692040/2016-presidential-polls-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-leading-battleground-states-win-lose/

Exit pollsters at  Edison Research never reveal the location of precincts, votes and survey results. The only way to prove that the unadjusted exit polls are correct (and the published results bogus) is 1) to reveal the complete exit poll timeline and the data for all precincts polled and 2) a True Vote analysis based on historical and current independent data.

True Vote analysis indicates that Trump won the popular and electoral vote and that pre-election and exit polls were rigged for Clinton by inflating Democratic Party-ID. True Vote Models were based on a) national Gallup Party-ID voter affiliation and b) returning 2012 voters.

As usual, state and national exit polls were forced to match the recorded vote. This was the first election in which the media discussed election fraud – but avoided the obvious U.S. suspects from prior elections and the rigged voting machines, illegal and disenfranchised voters. Now that the MSM finally admits election fraud, they blame it on the Russians! And don’t report the proven fact that the primary was rigged for Clinton.

Party-ID
Nine Pre-election polls (average): 28.8 Ind – 38.7 Dem- 31.9 Rep.
Final National Exit Poll (CNN): 31 Ind – 36 Dem – 33 Rep.
Gallup national voter affiliation survey: 40 Ind -32 Dem -28 Rep. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1R9Y3ae2uyW8SUxVUnnOt9ZyvheAxa0fAhesAw_nhciM/edit#gid=505041111

Nine Pre-election polls 
Clinton won the average: 45.8-43.3%
Trump won the average Gallup-adjusted poll: 44.4-42.9%
Trump won Independents: 43.6-33.8%

Final  National Exit Poll (forced to match the Recorded Vote)
Clinton won the reported vote: 48.2-46.2%.
Clinton won the National Exit Poll: 47.7-46.2%.
Trump won Independents by just 46-42% – a 5.8% discrepancy from the pre-election polls which he led by 9.8%. This anomaly is additional evidence that Trump won the True Vote.

Unadjusted exit polls (28 states)
Clinton won the polls: 49.6-43.6%
Clinton won the corresponding recorded vote: 49.3-45.2%

States not exit polled
Trump won: 50.4-43.7%

True Vote
Trump led the True Vote Model (three scenarios of his share of late undecided voters)
– Scenario I:  47.5-45.1%, 306 EV (50% undecided)
– Scenario II: 47.9-44.7%, 321 EV (60% undecided)
– Scenario III: 48.3-44.3%, 351 EV (70% undecided)

The True Vote Model analysis based on a plausible number of returning voters from the prior election  confirmed the three scenarios: https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2017/04/29/university-of-virginia-study-20-of-trump-voters-were-former-obama-voters/

The National Election Pool of six media giants funds exit pollster Edison Research. The published results are always forced to match the recorded vote which implies zero election fraud. But there is always election fraud.  Historically, unadjusted state and national exit polls always favored the Democratic candidate, but there was  a RED shift from the Democrat in the poll to the Republican in the recorded vote.

The True Vote Model indicates that the 1988-2008 unadjusted exit polls were accurate.
https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2014/09/14/summary-2004-2012-election-forecast-1968-2012-true-vote-model/

 

The 2016 Election Fraud Quiz

Richard Charnin
Updated: Nov. 23, 2016

LINKS TO  POSTS

2016 Election Model (EM)

True or False

1 The Democrats stole the primary from Bernie
2 The GOP primary was virtually fraud-free
3 Trump won a majority of voters after Sept. 1 (48-42%) according to Nat Exit Poll
4  Jill Stein’s 6% (her best) in Humboldt, CA the only US county with Open Source voting
5 George Soros had an interest in  unverifiable Smartmatic voting machines in 16 states

6 Millions of voters were disenfranchised
7 Millions of illegals voted (see Link1, Link2)
8 The Reported Vote is never equal to the True Vote
9 The MSM shilled for Hillary although she was under criminal investigation
10 Final published exit polls are always forced to match the recorded vote

11 Trump’s crowds were much larger than Clinton
12 Exit pollster Edison Research works for the National Election Pool
13 Unadjusted exit polls from 1988 matched the True Vote -until 2016
14 The MSM covered up 1988, 2000, 2004 elections and 2016 primary fraud
15 The MSM disparaged exit polls as a conspiracy theory- until 2016

16 Corporate media pollsters rigged the pre-election polls for HRC
17 Corporate media pollsters rigged the exit polls for HRC
18 The MSM never mentions the “third rail” – rigged voting machines
19 The MSM has focused strictly on voter disenfranchisement
20 Party ID  in 9 pre-election polls: 29 Ind, 39 Dem, 32 Rep 

21 Party ID in National Exit Poll: 31 Ind, 36 Dem, 33 Rep
22 Gallup voter affiliation survey: 40 Ind, 32 Dem, 28 Rep 
23 Trump led Independents in 9 pre-election polls: 44-34% (Election Model)
24 Trump led Independents in the National Exit Poll by just 46-42%
25  Fraction Magic  flips votes on central tabulators

26 Virtually all reported machine vote flipping was from Trump to HRC
27 The DNC not calling for a FULL audit indicates Trump won 
28 Jill Stein must have exceeded her recorded 1% of the national vote

29 SENATE: NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION WITH TRUMP CAMPAIGN

 

77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud

Richard Charnin

Oct. 7, 2016

77 Billion to One: 2016 Election Fraud 

The 2016 Democratic primaries have finally awakened the public to Election Fraud. Millions of voters who were unaware or in denial came to realize that our election system was rigged and that the mainstream media is complicit in covering up Election Fraud.

The exit poll naysayers in the corporate media don’t dare mention the third-rail of American politics – election fraud. The media pundits remain silent on electronic vote rigging. They maintain that the exit polls are inaccurate and call truth-seeking activists conspiracy buffs.

The media is silent on the 2015 Year in Elections report, an independent research project by 2,000 elections experts from Harvard University and the University of Sydney. The report ranked the United States dead last in electoral integrity among established Western democracies in evaluating the  integrity of 180 national parliamentary and presidential contests held July 1, 2012 to December 31, 2015 in 139 countries worldwide. The State Department relies on exit polls in elections overseas (but not in the U.S.)  to check for fraud if the discrepancies exceed 2%.

This book focuses largely on pre-election and exit polls. Until the 2016 presidential election, unadjusted exit polls closely matched the post-election True Vote models. The final adjusted exit polls are always forced to match the recorded vote.

Cumulative vote share analysis, based on actual vote counts, is another method which uncovers anomalies in the recorded vote.

Overwhelming evidence shows that Sanders won the primaries, despite the 3 million Clinton vote margin repeated endlessly in the media. He won the vast majority of 18-34 year-old voters.  His positions on Wall Street corruption, universal health care, eliminating student debt, etc. made him an overwhelming favorite among young voters.