RSS

Monthly Archives: March 2011

The True Vote Model: Components of Election Fraud – Uncounted, Stuffed and Switched Ballots

The True Vote Model: Components of Election Fraud – Uncounted, Stuffed and Switched Ballots

Source URL for 1988-2008 calculation tables:
http://richardcharnin.com/TrueVoteModelAdjustments.htm

March 29, 2011

The True Vote Model is based on National Exit Poll vote shares applied to a feasible mix of returning and new voters. A new feature has been added to the model to estimate the number of uncounted, stuffed and switched ballots that are required to fix the (recorded) vote – and steal an election.

http://richardcharnin.com/TrueVoteModels.htm

The True Vote is approximated by the following equation:
True Vote = Recorded Vote + Net Uncounted Vote – Switched Vote
Therefore, we have:
Recorded Vote = True Vote – Net Uncounted Vote + Switched Vote

The Census Bureau survey provides an estimate of total votes cast in each election (margin of error is 0.60%).
Votes Cast = Votes Recorded + Net Uncounted Vote
Net Uncounted Vote (NUV) = Votes Cast – Votes Recorded

Notice the steady decline in NUV since 1988 as mechanical voting machines (levers, punch cards) were phased out by DREs and optical scanners.

1988 – 102.2 million cast, 91.6 million recorded (10.6m).
1992 – 113.9 million cast, 104.4 million recorded (9.5m).
1996 – 105.0 million cast, 96.3 million recorded (8.7m).
2000 – 110.8 million cast, 105.4 million recorded (5.4m)
2004 – 125.7 million cast, 122.3 million recorded. (3.4m)
2008 – 132.3 million cast, 131.4 million recorded (0.9m).

National Recorded Vote Miscounts (estimated)
(in millions)

2008 – Cast 132.3, Uncounted 1.3, Stuffed 0.4, Switched 6.4
2004 – Cast 125.7, Uncounted 4.4, Stuffed 1.0, Switched 5.4
2000 – Cast 110.8, Uncounted 6.6, Stuffed 1.2, Switched 0.2
1996 – Cast 105.0, Uncounted 9.4, Stuffed 0.7, Switched 0.4
1992 – Cast 113.9, Uncounted 11.4, Stuffed 1.9, Switched 4.0
1988 – Cast 102.2, Uncounted 12.3, Stuffed 1.6, Switched 0.5

If NUV is >0, more votes were cast than recorded (more ballots were uncounted than stuffed).
If NUV is <0, there were more votes recorded than cast (more ballots were stuffed than uncounted).
We cannot know how many votes were actually uncounted or stuffed – we only know the net difference.

For instance, if NUV =200, it could be the result of 300 uncounted and 100 stuffed ballots. Or 400 uncounted and 200 stuffed. If the actual number of uncounted votes were known, the number of stuffed ballots could be calculated. And vice – versa.

If the votes are switched in cyberspace, the number of total votes cast is unchanged.

National 2004:
Bush won by 62-59 million recorded votes
Kerry won the True vote by 67-57 million.
There were 3.44 million net uncounted votes.
Estimate 4.40 million uncounted votes
NUV = Uncounted – Stuffed
Stuffed = 0.96 = 4.40 -3.44

Kerry wins 75% of the 4.4 million uncounted.
Assume that 90% of the stuffed ballots were for Bush.
Based on these numbers. over 5 million votes were switched from Kerry to Bush.

Ohio 2004
Bush won by 119k recorded votes.
Kerry won the unadjusted exit poll by 54-45.5% a 500K margin.
According to RFK, Jr., there were approximately 350,000 uncounted votes.
Assume that 75% (263k) of the uncounted ballots were for Kerry and 86k for Bush.

There were 143k more votes recorded than cast (143k net stuffed).
NUV = -143k = Uncounted – Stuffed ballots
Stuffed ballots = Uncounted – NUV = 493k = 350k – (-143k)
Assume 90% of the ballots (445k) were stuffed for Bush and 10% (49k) for Kerry,
Then Kerry’s NUV = 214k = 263k – 49k

The remaining unknown is the number of Kerry votes switched.
Kerry’s 2.962 million True Vote exceeded his 2.741 million recorded by 221k (required adjustment).
Switched votes = Required adjustment – NUV
Switched = 7k = 221k – 214k

Florida 2004
Bush won by 381k recorded votes.
Kerry won the unadjusted exit poll by 51.0-48.2%, a 200k margin.
There were 238k more votes recorded than cast (238k net stuffed).
Estimate approximately 221k uncounted votes.

We estimate that 75% (166k) of the uncounted ballots were for Kerry and 53k for Bush.
Since NUV = -238k = Uncounted – Stuffed ballots.
Stuffed ballots = Uncounted – NUV = 459k = 221k – (-238k)
Assume that 90% of the ballots (413k) were stuffed for Bush and 10% (46k) for Kerry,
Then Kerry’s NUV = 120k = 166k – 46k

The remaining unknown is the number of Kerry votes that were switched.
Kerry’s 3.760 million True Vote exceeded his 3.584 million recorded vote by 176k (required adjustment).
Switched votes = Required adjustment – NUV
Switched = 56k = 176k – 120k

New York
As a heavily Democratic stronghold, New York afforded a great opportunity for padding the Bush popular vote.
Even though Kerry won the recorded vote by 1.3 million, who has questioned his 58-40% landslide margin?
Kerry’s True Vote matched the unadjusted exit poll: 64-35%.The 12% margin discrepancy accounted for nearly 1/3 of Bush’s 3 million vote “mandate”.

There were 307k more votes cast than recorded (307k net uncounted).
If 462k were uncounted, then 152k ballots were stuffed, 139k for Bush.
Therefore, 282k votes were switched from Kerry to Bush.
Kerry’s true margin was cut by 910k votes.

Below is a statistical comparison 22 states, a combination of battleground and Kerry and Bush strongholds.
Kerry had a weighted 54.4% exit poll share and 49.8% recorded.

The following estimates are based on the following;
a) Census total votes cast
75% of uncounted votes were for Kerry
c) 100% of ballot stuffing was for Bush.
d) The unadjusted exit polls (Kerry 52.0% state aggregate) are used as the baseline. Kerry’s True Vote was close to 53.5%

In the 22 states, uncounted votes were approximately 5.2% of total cast. Stuffed ballots comprised 3.2%.
Based on the above, approximately 3.2% of total votes cast for Kerry were switched to Bush.

Again, it is important to note that uncounted votes are estimates. Only NUV is known. Regardless of the estimate, the final net adjustment is the difference between the recorded and true vote/exit poll. In the final analysis, the discrepancy is known – a combination of uncounted votes, stuffed ballots and switched votes. The combination is a function of the voting system(s).

The state data table is sorted by total votes cast.
These states had more votes recorded than cast: OH, FL, TN, CT, VA and MI.
Florida had 238k net stuffed ballots, Ohio 143k, Tennessee had 118k.
States with the highest percentage of uncounted ballots: NM, SC, AL
NC, NY and NH led in the percentage of votes switched.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on March 30, 2011 in True Vote Models

 

The 1988-2008 State and National True Vote Model

Getting Started with the 1988-2008 State and National True Vote Model

Richard Charnin (TruthIsAll)

Oct. 9, 2011

The 1988-2008 State and National True Vote Model (TVM) calculates the True Vote for all state and national presidential elections since 1988. It contains a unique database of total state and national votes cast, unadjusted state exit polls and final national exit polls. The TVM has a built-in sensitivity analysis to calculate vote shares and margins over a range of scenarios. It automatically determines vote shares of new and returning voters required to force a match to the state’s recorded vote. These capabilities provide a forensic tool to determine the likelihood of vote miscounting in any election.

The True Vote

It is incontrovertible that the Final National Exit Poll (NEP) never reflects the True Vote. The Final is always forced to match the recorded vote even though millions of votes are uncounted in every election. It stands to reason that if the Final is forced to match an impossible recorded vote, then the Final must also be impossible – and therefore all the demographic cross-tabs reported in the media must be invalid.

Simple arithmetic shows that in 1972, 1988, 1992, 2004 and 2008 the number of returning Nixon and Bush voters were not only implausible, but also physically impossible. In 2004 preliminary state and national exit polls were downloaded from the Internet after midnight. They all showed Kerry leading by substantial margins. But final exit polls show that impossible adjustments were made to the number of returning voters (“the mix”) as well as to the corresponding vote shares. The reason is obvious, but goes unreported in the mainstream media: It is standard operating procedure to force all exit polls to match the recorded vote – regardless of whether or not the votes were miscounted.

Therefore, to obtain a good approximation of the True Vote, the Final NEP returning voter mix must be replaced by a feasible, plausible set based on voter mortality and the best estimated turnout percentage of living previous election voters.

A feasible mix produces a True Vote that is quite close to the unadjusted state and national exit polls. Yet the average Democratic True Vote share usually exceeds the unadjusted exit polls by 1-2%. Why the discrepancy? The exit poll sample is based on prior election recorded votes. But as we know, the recorded vote always differs from the True Vote.

In the eleven presidential elections since 1968, over 80 million votes were cast but never counted. The Republicans led the average recorded vote by 49-45%. The Democrats led the True Vote by exactly the reverse: 49-45%.

The 1988-2008 recorded vote, exit poll and True Vote trends are displayed in tables and a bar graph. Deviations between Democratic and Republican vote shares are indicated, along with the Democratic exit poll discrepancies from the recorded vote.

An additional feature is the reconciliation of true vote and exit poll discrepancies from the recorded vote. The Net Uncounted Vote (NUV) is the difference between uncounted and stuffed ballots, both of which are usually unknown. The user can input an estimated uncounted vote rate. Based on the rate and the NUV, the model will calculate the number of stuffed ballots and switched votes in order to reconcile the discrepancies. In Florida 2000, there were 185,000 spoiled, uncounted ballots. In Ohio 2004, RFK, Jr. reported approximately 350,000 uncounted votes.

Using the Model

Online users are assigned anonymous numeric codes for the online chat feature.

There are just three essential inputs (click the “Input” sheet tab).
1, Election year: 1988-2008
2. State abbreviation code (NA for national)
3. The calculation method determines the number of returning voters from the previous state or national election:

Methods 1-4:
1 – Official Recorded vote
2 – Votes Cast (recorded + net uncounted)
3 – Unadjusted state exit polls
4 – Recursive True Vote (calculated)

The final state or national exit poll is also displayed at the right and forced to match the recorded vote.

Optional Data Input

The model has built-in defaults for the turnout of previous election voters in the current election and allocation of uncounted votes in the previous election.The default assumptions may be overridden. It is often of interest to view the changes to the base case shares of new and returning voters that are required to match a given total share. The model calculates the required vote shares automatically.

Forcing a Match to a Recorded or Hypothetical Vote Share

For Democrat, Republican and third-party (Other):
Total vote share = ∑ return voter mix (i) * vote share (i), where I =1 for DNV (new) voters, 2 = returning Democrat, 3 = returning Republican, 4 = returning Other.

Methods 1-4 calculate a plausible return voter mix based on previous election vote shares adjusted for voter mortality and turnout. The corresponding vote shares are adjusted automatically. This is a forensic tool for exposing likely vote miscounts.

Enter code 1 in the indicated cell to determine the vote shares required to force a match to the unadjusted exit poll.

To force a match to an arbitrary state or national vote share, enter the share. Shares of returning and new vote shares will be automatically adjusted.

In calculating the National True Vote (methods 1-4), the model uses Final NEP vote shares. An exception is the 2004 election in which preliminary 12:22am vote shares are used. For each method, the adjusted return voter mix replaces the Final NEP (impossible and/or implausible) mix.

Since the unadjusted “How Voted” exit poll cross-tabs are unavailable for the states, the model automatically generates a return voter mix and vote shares that force a match to the recorded vote. The vote shares are derived from the NEP shares by applying a state to national vote share ratio.

Sensitivity Analysis

In 2004, Bush won the recorded vote by 50.7-48.3%. The model shows that Bush needed 109.7% of returning Bush 2000 voters to match his recorded vote.

According to the 12:22am National Exit Poll timeline(the base case), Kerry had 57% of new voters, 91.0% of returning Gore voters and 10% of returning Bush voters. In the Final NEP, he had 54%, 90.0% and 9%. The Final was forced to match the recorded vote.

The sensitivity analysis is built-in. The first set of tables display 25 scenarios of Kerry vote share, margins and win probabilities. The scenarios are in increments around his base case share: 57% of new (DNV) voters and 10% share of returning Bush voters. The second set of tables are in increments around Kerry’s 91% base case share of returning Gore voters and 10% share of new voters.

To execute each scenario separately would be prohibitively time-consuming.

Base case (most-likely) vote share calculation
Kerry share = 53.6% = .17*.57 + .414*.91 + .377*.10 + .031*.64
= ∑ return voter mix (i) * vote share (i), where I =1 for DNV (new) voters, 2 = returning Democrats, 3 = returning Republicans, 4 = returning third-party (Other).

Results for the first set of scenarios (three 5×5 tables):
Worst case scenario (Kerry 53% of DNV; 8% of returning Bush voters):
Kerry has 52.1% and a 7.0 million vote margin.
Popular vote win probability: 96.8%

Most likely (Kerry 57% of DNV; 10% of returning Bush voters):
Kerry has 53.6% and a 10.7 million vote margin.
Popular vote win probability: 99.8%

Best case (Kerry 61% of DNV; 12% of returning Bush voters):
Kerry has 55.1% and a 14.4 million vote margin.
Popular vote win probability: 100.0%

True Vote Model Sheets
Click the tab at the bottom of the screen to view the sheet.
- Input Input data sheet
- Main Output summary
- TrueVote Calculation Detail.
- StateMod National and state recorded vote, exit poll and True Vote. The last two columns show the discrepancies between the True Vote vs. the Recorded Vote and Exit Poll.
- HistWPD 1988-2008 State Exit Polls: Within Precinct Discrepancies
2004Exit state exit poll timeline: Unadjusted WPE, Best GEO , Composite and Final (recorded vote). The WPE measures were provided by pollsters Edison Mitofsky. Enter 1 for VNS, 2 for DSS, 3 for IMS (aggregate Kerry shares 51.84%, 52.17% and 51.97%, respectively).
- StateExitWPE 1988-2008 votes cast, recorded and exit polls. The adjusted vote share is based on the uncounted vote allocation. The adjusted state and aggregate national share are reasonable approximations to the True Vote calculated in the StateModel.
- Trend 1988-2008 Democratic Recorded Vote and Exit Poll shares
- Machine04 2004 voting machines.
- Census – 1968-2008 Reported Voting rates

 
2 Comments

Posted by on March 17, 2011 in True Vote Models

 
 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 760 other followers