More evidence of DNC rigged voting machines in SC, just like the 2016 primary and presidential elections

Richard Charnin
March 4, 2020

LINKS TO  BLOG POSTS

More evidence of DNC rigged voting machines in SC, just like the 2016 primary and presidential elections in which Sanders and Trump were cheated.

In the 2016 primaries: the odds of Election Fraud favoring Clinton was 77 billion to one. The probability P that AT LEAST 11 of 26 primaries would exceed the MoE is calculated using the Binomial distribution.
 P = 1 in 76.8 Billion = 1-BINOMDIST(10,26,.025,true) https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2016/05/05/democratic-primaries-election-fraud-probability-analysis/

In the 2020 SC primary, the probability of  Election Fraud  favoring Biden was 99.2% based on the 3.7% discrepancy between Biden’s reported vote and the unadjusted exit poll.  A 3.0% margin of error is assumed. Assuming a 4.0% MoE, P=96.5%.  http://tdmsresearch.com/2020/03/02/south-carolina-2020-democratic-party-primary/

The probability P is calculated using the Normal distribution
P=99.2% = NORMDIST (EP, RS, MoE/1.96, true)
RS = 48.4%= Biden recorded vote share
EP = 44.7% = Biden exit poll share
MoE = 3.0% = margin of error

In the CA 2020 primary, there was a 4.2% discrepancy between Sanders 38% exit poll and 33.8% reported vote. The probability of fraud is 99.6%.

Sanders exit poll (EP) exceeded his reported share (RS) in 6 primaries for which we have exit poll data.

………RS…..EP…Diff….MoE…Prob Fraud
SC 19.9% 21.3% -1.4% 3.4% 79.0%
MA 26.6% 30.4% -3.8% 4.0% 96.9%
NH 25.6% 25.9% -0.3% 2.6% 58.9%
TX 30.0% 34.0% -4.0% 2.9% 99.7%
VT 50.7% 57.0% -6.3% 5.4% 98.9%
CA 33.8% 38.0% -4.2% 3.1% 99.6%

Avg 31.1% 34.4% -3.3% 3.6% 88.8%

Tim Canova: “Today we are greeted with news that Wasserman Schultz just endorsed Joe Biden for the 2020 race. To many of us, this seems like déjà vu all over again.It was also reported that Biden outperformed the exit polls in yesterday’s South Carolina primary, which uses electronic scanning machines they bought from Election Systems & Software (ES&S) for $51 million. We already know from our 2018 election against Wasserman Schultz how easy it is to rig the software of these electronic voting machines – either by hacking in remotely or by an insider manipulating the source code.

We have already received reports from a leading election expert in South Carolina that perhaps 10% of these ExpressVote machines failed in yesterday’s primary. We’ve learned from our rigged elections in South Florida that we cannot trust any electronic voting machines manufactured by ES&S and that we certainly cannot trust Debbie Wasserman Schultz.”  https://progressforall.org/

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-24/concern-grows-over-soros-linked-voting-machines