RSS

The Connecticut Primary: Did Clinton really win?

13 Jun

The Connecticut Primary: Did Clinton really win?

Richard Charnin
June 13, 2016

Richard Charnin

Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Exit Poll 
LINKS TO  POSTS
Democratic Primaries spread sheet
Recommended reading: election fraud-Nina Illingworth

Clinton won Connecticut by nearly 18,000 votes (51.8-46.4%).

Are we to believe that CT had just a 1.4% discrepancy as shown in the adjusted CNN exit poll  while its NY neighbor had an 11.8% discrepancy ?

Assuming this ABC news preliminary exit poll screenshot is legitimate, how does one explain the 21% discrepancy between the poll and the final recorded  vote?

 

Image result for ABC News CT primary exit poll

The preliminary exit poll  is usually released around 4:30 pm and is  based on  approximately  two-thirds of total respondents. In the CT poll, there were 1234 respondents. Assuming 800 respondents,  the preliminary exit poll had a  4.5% margin of error. For Clinton’s share to increase by 12%  (nearly triple the MoE) for just 434 additional respondents is virtually mathematically impossible.

Vote shares  adjusted to match the final CNN exit poll

CNN Final    Exit Poll 1234 Respondents…  3.63% MoE  
Clinton Sanders Other
Men 39% 43% 55% 2%
women 61% 55% 41% 4%
Total 50.32% 46.46% 3.22%
2-party 51.99% 48.01%
Recorded 51.80% 46.40% 1.80%
Diff -1.48% 0.06% 1.42%
Votes 328,395 170,075 152,410 5,910
Margin 17,665

Vote shares  adjusted to match the preliminary ABC exit poll

Preliminary Exit Poll Clinton Sanders Other
Men 39% 25% 70% 5%
women 61% 50% 46% 4%
Total 40.25% 55.36% 4.39%
2-party 42.10% 57.90%
Recorded 51.80% 46.40% 1.80%
Diff -11.55% 8.96% 2.59%
Votes 328,395 132,179 181,799 14,417
Margin 49,620

Inline image

 
12 Comments

Posted by on June 13, 2016 in 2016 election, Uncategorized

 

Tags: , ,

12 responses to “The Connecticut Primary: Did Clinton really win?

  1. trkingmomoe

    June 13, 2016 at 10:14 am

    Reblogged this on Once Upon a Paradigm and commented:
    This shows the screen shots of the exit polls before the adjustment to the outcome of the votes. It shows the the actual spread in the flipped votes. I think CT is named in the RICO case. The RICO case is naming 11 states plus California. Guys please post this everywhere you can.

     
    • Bev

      June 13, 2016 at 1:30 pm

      Richard, do you know which 11 states will be RICOed? Are they the ones shown by your spreadsheets? Would you mind putting your most applicable spreadsheet below.

       
      • Kathy Kane

        June 13, 2016 at 3:08 pm

        Check out Trustvote.org they will show the states in the lawsuit. Off the top of my head there is: MA, NY, CA, IL, MO, GA, AR, an OH.

         
      • Richard Charnin

        June 13, 2016 at 7:47 pm

        I do not know. But I assume they are basically the 11 states whose exit polls exceeded the margin of error.
        https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sGxtIofohrj3POpwq-85Id2_fYKgvgoWbPZacZw0XlY/edit#gid=1476097125

         
      • Bev

        June 13, 2016 at 7:53 pm

        Thanks Kathy.

        I do see the link to Richards Spreadsheets above. I thought there could be some needed preference of states that have actual evidence that can be counted, such as with voting machines that scanned real paper ballots, and of course all states would have provisional and mail-ins ballots. In other words, it might not be the worst of the top 11, but the worst of the top11 that had enough evidence to count.

         
    • SupportVeterans1

      June 14, 2016 at 10:06 am

      Shared.

       
  2. Don Daniels

    June 13, 2016 at 12:16 pm

    This is Grand Theft Nation, and it has to stop. I hope the RICO Suit gains traction.

     
  3. saywhatumean2say

    June 13, 2016 at 2:13 pm

    Reblogged this on saywhatumean2say and commented:
    See what I mean? Click on the site for a full report. ~~dru~~

     
  4. Salam Morcos

    June 15, 2016 at 3:52 pm

    I checked the spreadsheet and I have a question. I see that you relied on exit polls to determine how much Bernie would have won (I agree). But then you gave Bernie an additional 10% of all votes, and took away 5% of all Clinton votes. I found this a bit odd. Can you please explain your rational for doing so?
    Thanks.

     
    • Richard Charnin

      June 15, 2016 at 6:52 pm

      Those are conservative estimates.
      Sanders voter rolls were stripped (NY, CA, etc.) and flipped at the voting machines.
      Clinton’s votes were padded via absentees (see AZ).

       
  5. Felicia Novak

    June 18, 2016 at 9:19 am

    So happy this is being brought to justice. thank you.

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Richard Charnin's Blog

JFK Conspiracy and Systemic Election Fraud Analysis

%d bloggers like this: