RSS

2016 Primary Exit Polls Party-ID: forcing a match to the recorded vote

22 Jul

2016 Primary Exit Polls Party-ID: forcing a match to the recorded vote

Richard Charnin
July 22, 2016

Richard Charnin

Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts
Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Poll
LINKS TO  POSTS
Democratic Primaries spread sheet
From TDMS Research: Democratic 2016 primaries

This  analysis seeks to determine an approximate True Vote in the 2016 Democratic primaries.

Clinton led the average of the adjusted exit polls (which were forced to match the recorded vote) by 56.4-43.6%. But there has been a significant increase in Independents tn National Party-ID statistics since 2014.

2014 National Party-ID: Dem 40.5 – Rep 35.2 – Ind 24.2%
2-party mix: Dem 62.6 – Ind 37.4%

Note the 19% increase in Independents since 2014:

2016 National Party-ID: Dem 32 -Rep 25 -Ind 43%
2-party mix: Ind 57.3- Dem 42.7%.

Gallup poll Party preference trend: http://www.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx

In the exit polled primaries, Sanders had a 51.3% True Vote and a 43.6% Recorded Vote.

The calculation of the True Vote differs from the Recorded Vote (adjusted Exit poll) in just one aspect: Independent and Democratic weights are based on the actual 2016 Party-ID mix in which independents comprise 57.3% and Democrats just 42.7% of the two-party mix. Sanders vote shares are unchanged.

In other words the True Vote assumes that no voters were disenfranchised and/or removed from the rolls.

The 2016  Party-ID  mix for each state is estimated by applying the equivalent proportional change from the 2014 National Party-ID to the 2016 National Party ID.

Let’s compare the the 2016 Party-ID effect on vote shares to the adjusted exit poll Party-ID weights  in three primaries: NY, MA, WI.

Candidate vote shares are held constant. The only difference between the adjusted exit poll (which was forced to match the recorded vote) and the True Vote  is the Party-ID mix. Sanders does significantly better when the 2016 Party-ID percentages are used.

View the exit polls here:
http://www.cnn.com/election/primaries/polls/NY/Dem

View the spreadsheet calculations here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sGxtIofohrj3POpwq-85Id2_fYKgvgoWbPZacZw0XlY/edit#gid=610570359

NY Primary Exit poll matched to the recorded vote

Party ID Pct Clinton Sanders
Dem 83% 62% 38%
Ind 14% 28% 72%
Vote  97% 55.4% 41.6%
2-party  100% 57.1% 42.9%

NY True Vote

2016 PartyID Clinton Sanders
Dem 47% 62% 38%
Ind 53% 28% 72%
2-party 44.0% 56.0%

MA Primary Exit poll matched to the recorded vote

Party ID Pct Clinton Sanders
Dem 65% 60% 40%
Ind 33% 33% 66%
Vote   98% 49.9% 47.8%
2-party 100% 51.1% 48.9%

MA True Vote

2016 PartyID Clinton Sanders
Dem 30% 60% 40%
Ind 70% 33% 66%
2-party 41.2 58.8%

WI Primary Exit poll matched to the recorded vote

PartyID Clinton Sanders
Dem 71% 50% 50%
Ind 27% 28% 72%
Vote 43.1% 54.9%
2-party 43.9% 56.1%

WI True Vote

2016 PartyID Clinton Sanders
Dem 48% 50% 50%
Ind 52% 28% 72%
2-party 38.5% 61.5%

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sGxtIofohrj3POpwq-85Id2_fYKgvgoWbPZacZw0XlY/pubchart?oid=244472232&format=image

 Sanders True Vote (2016 Party-ID) Exit Poll (Recorded)
AL 30.6% 19.8%
AR 39.8% 31.0%
CT 62.3% 47.4%
FL 44.1% 34.1%
GA 36.6% 28.3%
IA 60.1% 49.9%
IL 55.9% 49.1%
IN 61.4% 52.4%
MA 58.1% 49.3%
MD 40.0% 34.5%
MI 56.8% 50.8%
MO 56.9% 49.9%
MS 24.3% 16.6%
NC 48.1% 42.8%
NH 67.3% 61.4%
NV 58.5% 47.3%
NY 56.0% 42.1%
OH 51.9% 43.1%
OK 57.1% 55.5%
PA 54.0% 43.9%
SC 38.2% 26.1%
TN 42.4% 32.9%
TX 40.9% 33.7%
VA 45.0% 35.4%
VT 87.2% 86.3%
WI 61.5% 56.7%
WV 53.0% 51.4%

 

 
10 Comments

Posted by on July 22, 2016 in 2016 election, Uncategorized

 

Tags: , , ,

10 responses to “2016 Primary Exit Polls Party-ID: forcing a match to the recorded vote

  1. Don Deppeller

    July 22, 2016 at 8:20 pm

    Well done as usual, though I’m not clear on whether the percentage of independents remains uniform across all the states in your analysis or not, especially considering how it changes in time from 2014 to 2016.

     
  2. jeffreyaackerman

    July 23, 2016 at 7:17 am

    NY true vote is broken up by party-ID as either Dem. or Ind. I thought that independents were not allowed to vote in the dem. primary.

     
    • Richard Charnin

      July 23, 2016 at 8:10 pm

      The True Vote assumes all who would have voted but were disenfranchised or shut out or whose whose votes were flipped.

      Check the NY exit poll Party-ID: http://www.cnn.com/election/primaries/polls/NY/Dem

       
    • Adriana A.

      July 25, 2016 at 4:09 am

      I think it depends on state. Here in Arizona, if you registered as an Independent, you could not vote in the primary. But is that true for all states?

       
      • Richard Charnin

        July 25, 2016 at 7:49 pm

        No, there are open states where Independents can vote.

         
      • jeffreyaackerman

        July 26, 2016 at 6:30 am

        In N.Y. state only democrats could vote. I heard there was a March 25 deadline to register as a democrat. I made sure to register before the March 25 as a democrat, but the rule here has for many years been that when you register, you are not registering for the upcoming election, but rather for the future election cycles. So I was not able to vote for Bernie.

         
  3. rockethead

    July 27, 2016 at 8:30 pm

    This is interesting, but why wouldn’t the Party ID for people at the Democratic primary skew towards a higher percentage of Democrats?

    Is it because there has been a strong shift toward Independent identification, but no similar change in exit polling?

    Is it because the Sanders turnout should be heavily skewed toward Independent voters?

     
    • Richard Charnin

      July 28, 2016 at 4:18 pm

      Vote shares and Party-ID mix of Dems and Repubs in the exit polls are adjusted to match the recorded vote to within 0.5%.
      But the mix does not reflect the actual composition of Democrats and Independents.
      Using 2016 party-preference mix based on the Gallup survey, Bernie does significantly better.
      We can conclude that a combination of closed and rigged (strip and flip) primaries cost Bernie the nomination.

       
  4. danisms

    August 22, 2016 at 1:30 pm

    Richard could there be a virus attached, since I’ve posted this article I cannot share it in my Facebook Bernie Sanders groups. Has anyone else experienced anything weird?

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Richard Charnin's Blog

JFK Conspiracy and Systemic Election Fraud Analysis

%d bloggers like this: