RSS

JFK: Judyth Baker Pixel Analysis of Altgens6 photo proves Oswald is Doorman

Richard Charnin
July 27, 2014

JFK Blog Posts
JFK Calc Spreadsheet Database
Tables and Graphs

JFK: Judyth Baker’s Pixel Analysis of Altgens6 photo proves Oswald is Doorman

The following summary is from Judyth Baker, author of Me and Lee:
ANNOUNCING A HISTORIC BREAKTHROUGH THAT HELPS PROVE LEE OSWALD’S INNOCENCE!
See the full article and pixel photos: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1X2eD2Wl3xSmRHTuE02ntfYkb3ES2Kuo8wl3HHzzAlD8/pub

Click on the photo to view Baker’s Facebook post and reader comments

As a living witness, trained as a scientist, who knows Lee Oswald didn’t shoot John F. Kennedy, have posted many arguments defending Lee. BUT TODAY, YOU’LL READ THE MOST IMPORTANT ARGUMENT I’VE EVER POSTED–AND IT’S A BRAND NEW PIECE OF EVIDENCE! (Hope you’ll share it with everyone!)

You’ll learn that Billy Lovelady was NOT standing in the doorway of the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) as he claimed, when the fatal shots were fired. WE DIDN’T HAVE A SCIENTIFIC WAY TO DISPROVE THAT -UNTIL NOW. FOR DECADES, THOSE WHO SAID LEE OSWALD WAS STANDING THERE WERE MOCKED AND RIDICULED. Then, a few months ago, I conducted a pixelation analysis of Lovelady’s shirt and Lee Oswald’s shirt –and compared it to the Altgens6 photo (Doorway Figure). LEARN THE TRUTH, below–and spread the word!

Pixelation Analysis: Lovelady and Oswald Shirts vs. Doorway Figure’s Shirt in Altgens6

Altgens6 shows a tiny figure in the doorway of the Texas State Book Depository Building (TSBD) in the early moments when firing first occurred in the Kennedy assassination. The face of this figure looks troublingly like Lee Harvey Oswald, although a portion of the face also looks like fellow TSBD employee Billy Lovelady. Though Lovelady was described as seated, eating his lunch, at about this time, whilst notes made by Captain Will Fritz include the words “Out front with Bill Shelley” – a statement presumably made by Oswald indicating that he was also outside, and present near the doorway, the Warren Commission concluded that Billy Lovelady was the Doorway Figure.

Lovelady himself would eventually state that HE was the Doorway Figure. Without the statement from Lovelady, there would have been fierce arguments favoring Oswald as the Doorway Figure, largely because the figure seems too slim to be Lovelady. For years, anyone who suggested that the Doorway Figure was not Lovelady was subjected to ridicule. However, with better photos and with the emergence of evidence suggesting that Lovelady’s testimony (and even his likeness) had been manipulated, it seemed to me that a pixel analysis of the shirt of the Doorway Figure might resolve the matter once and for all.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on July 27, 2014 in JFK

 

Tags: , , , , ,

To Believe the Zapruder Film was Not Altered, You Must Believe…

Richard Charnin
July 21, 2014

JFK Blog Posts
JFK Calc Spreadsheet Database
Tables and Graphs

To Believe the Zapruder Film was Not Altered, You Must Believe…

- The JFK limo did not come to a complete stop. Thirty-three (33) of 59 witnesses were mistaken.
- The Zapruder film was not shown until 1975 because it was too gruesome, not because it falsely depicted the actual event.

- Frame 313 is authentic. It is the only frame which shows the effects of the fatal head shot.
- In Frame 313 the pink explosion at the right front of JFK’s head indicates the shot came from behind.
- The Parkland hospital and autopsy witnesses who described a fist-size exit wound in the right rear of JFK’s head were all mistaken.

- SS agent Clint Hill did not cover the bodies of JFK and Jackie Kennedy.
- Hill was mistaken in describing a right-rear head exit wound
- DPD Harkins was mistaken in his claim of crossing the street between the limo and the follow-up car.

- ARRB Lead Investigator Doug Horne was mistaken in claiming that the film’s chain of custody was not sent directly to Life Magazine the day after the assassination but went to the CIA’s primary photo analysis facility in Washington DC, the National Photographic Interpretation Center (NPIC).
- Horne is mistaken in stating that “the real exit wound behind President Kennedy’s right ear, in the back of his head has been blacked out on the film, a false exit wound has been painted onto the right front and the top of his head, to mimic the autopsy photos”.
- Horne is mistaken in claiming that “You do not see any exit debris leaving the back of President Kennedy’s head and traveling to the rear in the Zapruder film. So if the car stop has been removed which it may have and if the exit debris leaving the back of his head has been removed, I should say that they’re not present, so therefore I suspect they’ve been removed.”
- Horne is mistaken in claiming that the agent who delivered the film to NPIC on the second night to make a second set of briefing boards and said it came from Hawkeye Works, the CIA’s secret photo lab at Kodak headquarters in Rochester NY.

- Dino Brugioni, Duty Officer at NPIC, the photo expert who saw the original Z-film on Nov.22, was mistaken in claiming that a) the head shot did not look anything like the extant Z-film, b) the rear head wound resulted in a white cloud of brain matter which was visible in a number of frames, not just 313.

- Motion picture film professionals who said the dark patches in blacked out areas of the Z-film did not look like natural shadows were mistaken.
- All seven experts in the post production of motion pictures and special effects who viewed the high definition scans of each frame of the Z=film were mistaken in claiming that the head wounds were poorly altered.

Doug Horne and Dino Brugioni: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGr21FZBVL4

Jim Fetzer Interview of Doug Horne: http://nwopodcast.com/fetz/media/jim%20fetzer%20real%20deal-doug%20horne.mp3

Doug Horne provides details of the true chain of custody, where, why and how the film was altered in this very comprehensive piece: http://assassinationofjfk.net/the-two-npic-zapruder-film-events-signposts-pointing-to-the-films-alteration/

This mathematical proof that the Z-film was altered is based on Vince Palamara’s article (33 of 59 eyewitnesses saw a FULL JFK limo STOP): http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2014/02/04/jfk-assassination-mathematical-proof-that-the-zapruder-film-was-altered/

John Costella on the Z-film hoax: http://assassinationscience.com/johncostella/jfk/intro/
A detailed frame-by-frame analysis based on basic optical physics calculations:

http://johncostella.com/jfk/#duluth

Oliver Stone on Democracy Now: the Z-film was altered: http://www.infowars.com/oliver-stone-zapruder-film-was-altered/

Philip Stahl (“Copernicus”): a mathematical analysis confirms that the Z-film was altered and the removal of frames does not invalidate the acoustic evidence. http://brane-space.blogspot.com/2010/02/was-zapruder-film-tampered-with.html

This blogger changed his mind and is now convinced the Z-film was altered: http://theamericanchronicle.blogspot.com/2013/04/was-zapruder-film-altered-redux.html

 
1 Comment

Posted by on July 22, 2014 in JFK

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

To Believe Oswald was Not Standing in Front of the TSBD, You Must Believe that…

Richard Charnin
July 27, 2014

JFK Blog Posts
JFK Calc Spreadsheet Database
Tables and Graphs

To believe Oswald was not standing in front of the TSBD at 12:30pm, you must believe all of the following…

- Oswald lied to Det. Will Fritz when he said he was “out with Bill Shelley in front” at 12:30.
- Oswald lied because he had no alibi other than being seen on the 2nd floor by TSBD manager Roy Truly and policeman Marrion Baker at 12:31.

- Fritz’s notes of his Oswald interview were hidden until 1993 due to poor record-keeping. They were released by ARRB in 1997.
- Oswald’s statement to Fritz was not revealed by the Warren Commission because of administrative oversight.

- The fact that not one witness claimed to have seen Oswald in front is proof he was not there.
- The Warren Commission would surely have allowed testimony that Oswald was in front and would have proceeded to begin a new investigation.

- Unlike his fellow employees, Oswald had no interest in viewing the motorcade.
- Oswald did not view the motorcade because he was thirsty and wanted a coke.

- The figures to the left of Doorman in the famous Altgens6 photo were accidentally blotted out during photo processing.
- The fact that Lovelady looks like Doorman cannot be due to film alteration.
- Lovelady was mistaken or lied to Warren Commission interrogator Ball when he said he sat down on the steps eating his lunch in front of Bill Shelley who was standing behind him.
- The fact that Ball asked Lovelady to place a DARK arrow pointing to himself in the DARK area of Altgens6 makes perfect sense and is not suspicious.

- It is just coincidence that Doorman’s long-sleeve open shirt was just like the shirt that Oswald wore in custody.
- The fact that Doorman is wearing Oswald’s shirt does not mean he is Oswald.

You can show that Judyth Bakers pixel analysis of Oswald’s shirt vs. Lovelady’s, which proves that Oswald is Doorman, is invalid. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1X2eD2Wl3xSmRHTuE02ntfYkb3ES2Kuo8wl3HHzzAlD8/pub

- The fact that Doorman’s open long-sleeve shirt is not Lovelady’s short-sleeved striped shirt or his long-sleeve plaid shirt proves nothing.
- The fact that Oswald looks like Doorman and is wearing his shirt is sheer coincidence.
- Lovelady was mistaken or lied to CBS News when he said that the open short-sleeve striped shirt he was photographed wearing by the FBI on 2/29/64 was not the shirt he wore on 11/22/63.

- It is just a coincidence that many who do not believe Oswald was Doorman also believe that the Altgens6 photo was not altered and that the Zapruder film was not altered and the photos of Oswald standing in the backyard holding a rifle were not fakes.

- It is inconceivable that Oswald was Doorman. This should not even be discussed since it is 50 years after the assassination. It has already been decided.

-The WC said Lovelady was Doorman. Of course, the WC also said Oswald was on the 6th floor shooting JFK. But why would the WC lie about Doorman? What would be their motive? Besides, Doorman looks like Lovelady, therefore it must be him. Who are we to question it?

Did Officer Baker and Roy Truly encounter Oswald on the 2nd floor? http://jfkthelonegunmanmyth.blogspot.com/2013/01/the-lunchroom-encounter-that-never-was.html

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on July 14, 2014 in JFK

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

JFK: Talking points from the McAdams-Reitzes Academy of Disinformation

JFK: Talking points from the McAdams-Reitzes Academy of Disinformation

Richard Charnin
July 7, 2014

JFK Blog Posts
JFK Calc Spreadsheet Database
Tables and Graphs

The following topics are often cited by Warren Commission apologists to prove that Oswald was the Lone Gunman. The topics comprise a basic curriculum of talking points for Lone Nutters in the McAdams-Reitzes Academy of Disinformation. Nothing fancy. The links are to articles which expose the lies (there are many other articles which do the same):

1. Rifle? http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm
2. Handgun? http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/DPD.htm
3. Brennan? http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/brennan.htm
4. Backyard photos? http://brane-space.blogspot.com/2009/11/hany-farids-pixelated-illusions.html
5. Buell Frazier? http://spot.acorn.net/jfkplace/09/fp.back_issues/15th_Issue/pbag2.html

6. Curtain rods? http://22november1963.org.uk/lee-harvey-oswald-curtain-rods
7. Oswald on the 6th floor? http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/lunchroom_encounter.htm
8. Palm print? http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/paraffin_test.htm
9. 6.5 bullet fragment? http://www.mtgriffith.com/web_documents/moreon65fragment.htm
10. Dealey Plaza witnesses? http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2014/02/26/jfk-dealey-plaza-witnesses-john-mcadams-strange-list/

11. Ruth Paine? http://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/2009/12/ruth-paines-garage.html
12. Head wound? http://www.mtgriffith.com/web_documents/largewound.htm
13. Tippit? http://www.mtgriffith.com/web_documents/malice.htm
14. Zapruder? http://assassinationofjfk.net/the-two-npic-zapruder-film-events-signposts-pointing-to-the-films-alteration/
15. Roger Craig?http://spot.acorn.net/jfkplace/09/fp.back_issues/01st_Issue/rcraig.html

Who still believes the Warren Report? Your answers to the 10 hypothetical questions in this post will reveal whether or not you do: http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2014/04/05/10137/

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on July 7, 2014 in JFK

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

JFK Explosive Testimony: Roger Craig, Will Fritz and Oswald

JFK Explosive Testimony: Roger Craig, Will Fritz and Oswald

Richard Charnin
July 1, 2014

JFK Blog Posts
JFK Calc Spreadsheet Database
Tables and Graphs

Let’s review what these authors had to say: Jim Garrison, Jim Marrs and Jim Douglass

Garrison: “On the Trail of the Assassins”, pg. 110
Garrison met with Craig a few months after his testimony which doomed Craig’s career as a law enforcement officer. He relates Craig’s story about meeting with Capt. Will Fritz in his office where Oswald freely admitted that it was Ruth Paine’s station wagon and did not deny getting into it. Sheriff Buddy Walthers went out to the Paine residence and confirmed that she did have a Nash Rambler station wagon. It is on the record. Neither Fritz nor any other member of the Dallas Homicide division followed up the lead. Fritz later denied that Craig had been in his office at police headquarters or told him about the Rambler. However, a news photo that turned up six years later in Dallas police Chief’s Curry’s autobiography clearly showed Craig was there.

Marrs: “Crossfire”, pg. 318.
Craig said that as he approached the TSBD and asked for someone involved in the investigation, a man in a grey suit told him “I’m with the Secret Service”. Craig testified that the SS agent took no interest or notes of the persons leaving the scene, but he became extremely interested as soon as Craig mentioned the Rambler. It was the only part of Craig’s statement that he took down in the pad he was holding. Regarding Craig and Oswald in Fritz’s office: This was explosive testimony since Oswald had officially made his way home by bus and taxi. Therefore, the Warren Commission stated it could not accept important elements of Craig’s testimony. It went even further, stating that the meeting between Craig and Oswald never occurred. Marrs also mentions that the proof he was there was based on the photo in Curry’s book.

Douglass: “JFK and the Unspeakable”, pg. 274
After Oswald mentioned Ruth Paine’s station wagon, he said ”Now everyone will know who I am”. At this point Fritz ushered Craig out of his office. It was too late – for the government and for Craig who had seen and heard too much. What Roger Craig would testify to in the years ahead would be corroborated by a parade of other witnesses: Ed Hoffman, Carolyn Walther, James Worrell, Richard Carr, Helen Forrest, James Pennington, Marvin Robinson and Roy Cooper. The Rambler was the getaway car.

Since the Warren Commission decided by that time that Oswald must have escaped in a cab and bus, the WC also disregarded Craig’s account of the dialogue with Oswald in Fritz’s office – because Fritz denied Craig was even there. Craig would also be attacked on the basis of an FBI report that seemed to show Paine did not own a Nash Rambler but rather a 1955 Chevrolet station wagon. Judged in terms of its source, the report proved nothing. The FBI agent who wrote it would later confess to a congressional committee that he was guilty of deliberately destroying key assassination evidence in obedience to his FBI superior’s orders.

By rejecting Roger Craig’s testimony, the Warren Commission could ignore the significance of Oswald’s words to his interrogator, Will Fritz. According to Roger Craig, it was Oswald who said that the car that picked him up was a station wagon owned by Mrs. Paine, who Oswald then defended.

Notes:
Fritz also failed to reveal his notes which surfaced 30 years later. Oswald said he was “out with Bill Shelley in front” at the time of the shooting. Of course, the WC never mentioned the notes.

Craig claimed there were at least 14 instances where his testimony was twisted by Attorney David Belin who interviewed Craig in private. One would think that a witness as critical as Craig would be interviewed in front of the Warren Commission.

In choosing to dismiss Craig’s testimony,the WC relied on the tortured testimony of
- Cab driver Whaley, whose manifest showed he picked up Oswald at 12:30. He failed to identify him in the lineup and his description of Oswald’s clothing was full of contradictory statements.
- Bus driver McWatters could not identify Oswald.
- Bus passenger Mary Bledsoe, who McWatters did not recall seeing on the bus. Her testimony was disjointed and unintelligible. She was Oswald’s former landlady – a perfect witness.

Finally, who is more credible: Roger Craig or…. David Belin, Will Fritz, Ruth Paine, Whaley, McWatters, Bledsoe?

Who had the motive to twist and intimidate testimony, Roger Craig or the Warren Commission? Craig’s motive was to tell the truth as he saw it. The Warren Commission made sure that evidence of a conspiracy was suppressed at all costs and that Oswald was the lone assassin.

Consider the pathetic cab and bus ride testimony and WC motivation to avoid a conspiracy at all costs. We know that someone got into the station wagon based on solid confirmation of Craig’s testimony by at least six witnesses. If the cab/bus ride was a bogus contrivance, then Oswald had to get home some other way. By simple logic, one must assume that he got back in the station wagon – if you believe Craig and the six witnesses. Oswald looked like himself.

Roger Craig stuck to his story to the bitter end.

Testimony of Roger Craig
http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/craig.htm http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/craig1.htm http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/craigsh.htm

Testimony of Will Fritz
http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/fritz1.htm http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/fritz3.htm http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/fritz2.htm

Testimony of William Whaley
http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/whaley1.htm http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/whaley2.htm http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/whaley3.htm

Testimony of Cecil McWatters http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/mcwatters.htm

Testimony of Mary Bledsoe
http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/bledsoe.htm http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/bledsoe1.htm

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on July 1, 2014 in JFK

 

Tags: , , ,

JFK: Mathematical proof that the Oswald backyard photos were faked

JFK: Mathematical proof that the Oswald backyard photos were faked.

Richard Charnin
June 9, 2014

JFK Blog Posts
JFK Calc Spreadsheet Database
Tables and Graphs

The famous photo of Oswald holding a Mannlicher-Carcano rifle and a copy of the Daily Worker which appeared on the cover of LIFE magazine convinced millions he was the Lone Assassin. But there were four photos which upon close inspection and a mathematical analysis prove that they were faked.

Philip Stahl has shown a sophisticated mathematical proof that the photos were faked: http://brane-space.blogspot.com/2009/11/hany-farids-pixelated-illusions.html

Using differential equation fractal analysis, Stahl shows that the V-shaped shadow under Oswald’s nose is essentially identical in all four photos. Stahl debunks the pixel analysis of software scientist Hany Farid who claimed that the photos were genuine. Farid’s lab was partially funded by the FBI. Very strange.

Oswald had worked in a photo lab (Jagger-Childs-Stovall). He told DPD Captain Will Fritz that his face was superimposed on another body – and that he would prove it. He never had the chance. He also told Fritz that he never owned a Mannlicher-Carcano. http://www.nytimes.com/1997/11/21/us/interrogator-s-notes-say-oswald-denied-assassination-role.html

There is absolutely no change in Oswald’s facial position or expression in the four backyard photos – a physical impossibility. In 1977, Canadian Defense Dept. photographic specialist Major General John Pickard determined that there was a 99% probability the LIFE Magazine cover photo was a fake and noted that each photo was taken from a slightly different angle. When one photo was laid atop another in succession, it is found that nothing matches exactly. Pickard observed: “Yet, impossibly, while one body is bigger – the heads match perfectly.” Very strange.

Judyth Vary Baker wrote this comprehensive essay on Farid’s flawed analysis of the backyard photos. http://www.scribd.com/doc/38733842/Farid-s-Folly-and-the-Lee-Harvey-Oswald-Backyard-Photo-Fiasco

David von Pein, a Warren Commission apologist, claims that Oswald owned the Mannlicher Carcano: http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2010/07/mannlicher-carcano.html

Michael T. Griffith, a well-known JFK researcher, provides substantial evidence that Oswald did not own the rifle: http://michaelgriffith1.tripod.com/faulty.htm

Of course, Oswald could have purchased a rifle anonymously at any gun shop in Texas, so why would he buy a Carcano using a traceable mail order as “Alex Hidell” from Klein’s Sporting Goods in Chicago? Very strange. http://jfklancer.com/pdf/moyer.pdf

Hidell was apparently a cover name for agents. It was also the ID found on Richard Case Nagell, a CIA agent. Nagell became aware of a plan to assassinate JFK and was afraid of being the patsy. So he got himself arrested to give him an alibi by shooting the ceiling of a bank. Dick Russell wrote it in “The Man Who Knew Too Much”. Very strange.

This article attempts to unmask the real “Alek Hidell”. http://theamericanchronicle.blogspot.com/2013/09/unmasking-alek-hidell.html

When will the corporate media ever report the above facts and analysis? Probably never. Note Rachel Maddow’s pathetic discussion of Oswald and the Mannlicher Carcano. Very strange. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prtUkzyO0I0

Rachel never mentioned the testimony of award-winning Dallas Deputy Sheriff Roger Craig. Four Dallas police officers (Boone, Craig, Weitzman, Fritz) initially located a 7.65 Mauser on the 6th floor of the Texas Schoolbook Depository. It was reported all over the media. There was no question about it being a Mauser: “7.65 Mauser” was stamped on the weapon. The CIA reported that it was a Mauser. But a few hours later, it morphed into a Mannlicher Carcano. The rest is history. Very strange, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFEx8hjD8kE

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on June 9, 2014 in JFK

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

JFK Probability Analysis: Suspicious Deaths of Dealey Plaza Witnesses

JFK Probability Analysis: Suspicious Deaths of Dealey Plaza Witnesses

Richard Charnin
June 4, 2014

JFK Blog Posts
JFK Calc Spreadsheet Database
Tables and Graphs

The probabilities of JFK witness deaths for various groups have been previously posted: Warren Commission, London Times actuary,Garrison/ Shaw, Church, HSCA, Simkin Educational Forum, JFK-related 1400+ witness reference “Who’s Who in the JFK Assassination”.

It is an interesting exercise to calculate the probabilities of suspicious deaths of 20 Dealey Plaza witnesses among the 122 in the JFK Calc spreadsheet database over the 15 year period from 1964-78.

The HSCA in 1979 claimed that the London Sunday Times actuary’s probability calculation of 18 material witness deaths in the three years following the assassination was invalid. The reason: the witness universe was unknown. But the HSCA did not consider Dealey Plaza witnesses or other known witness groups cited above. The HSCA could have confirmed the actuary with a true analysis.

The actuary’s 1 in 100,000 trillion probability is matched assuming 385 Dealey Plaza witnesses, 15 homicides and the average U.S. homicide rate (0.000084) over 15 years.

The fact that they were in Dealey Plaza makes them obvious material witnesses – by definition. Furthermore, 14 of the 20 witnesses testified at the Warren Commission, 4 were sought to testify in the Garrison trial, 2 at the Church Senate hearings and 3 at the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA).

View the witness list here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjAk1JUWDMyRdDFSU3NVd29xWWNyekd2X1ZJYllKTnc#gid=79

Of the 20 suspicious deaths, 8 were officially ruled unnatural (2 homicides, 5 accidents, 1 suicide). The other 12 were ruled natural (5 heart attacks, 7 other).

The probability is 1 in 1500 of 8 ruled unnatural deaths assuming 300 witnesses.

But many ruled accidents and suicides were likely homicides (as were heart attacks and sudden cancers). A statistical analysis of the expected number of accidents, suicides and natural deaths indicates there were approximately 15 unnatural deaths – all homicides. Let’s calculate the probabilities of 8 and 15 homicides, assuming 2X the national homicide rate.

Assuming 300 witnesses, the probability of 15 homicides is 1 in 175 trillion.
The probability of 8 homicides is 1 in 700 thousand.

Assuming 500 witnesses, the probability of 15 homicides is 1 in 130 billion.
The probability of 8 homicides is 1 in 18 thousand.

View the calculations in column “O”: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjAk1JUWDMyRdDFSU3NVd29xWWNyekd2X1ZJYllKTnc#gid=41

Sensitivity Analysis
(Assumption: Dallas 2X National Homicide rate)
Probabilities range from 1 in 5000 for 600 witnesses, 8 homicides to
1 in 60,000 trillion for 200 witnesses, 15 homicides.

..............DEALEY PLAZA WITNESSES/ PROBABILITIES
Hom 200..... 300..... 400..... 500..... 600
08 6.79E-08 1.39E-06 1.11E-05 5.32E-05 1.83E-04
1 in 14mil... 700k.... 90k..... 18k...... 5000

09 3.80E-09 1.16E-07 1.24E-06 7.36E-06 3.03E-05
11 8.76E-12 6.01E-10 1.13E-08 1.05E-07 6.17E-07
13 1.38E-14 2.08E-12 6.80E-11 9.60E-10 7.98E-09

15 1.68E-17 5.70E-15 3.31E-13 7.31E-12 8.75E-11
1 in 60000tr 175tr.. 3tr.... 130bil... 11 billion

Dealey Plaza witnesses:
Inv: sought by (W)arren Commission, (G)arrison trial, (C)hurch hearings, HSCA

Date Witness …….Inv Category
7501 Allen Sweatt W POLICE
7901 Billy Lovelady W WITNESS TSBD
6901 Buddy Walthers WG POLICE
6901 Charles Mentesana – WITNESS TSBD
7109 Cliff Carter W LBJ
7801 Clint Lewis WH POLICE
7509 Earl Cabell WG CIA
6606 Frank Martin W POLICE
7502 Jack Beers W MEDIA
7402 J.A. Milteer C MINUTEMEN
6701 Jack Ruby W MAFIA POLICE
7604 James Chaney - POLICE
6611 James Worrell W WITNESS TSBD
7707 Ken O’Donnell WC JFK
6608 Lee Bowers W WITNESS KNOLL
6311 Lee Oswald - RUBY FBI CIA
7101 Mac Wallace - LBJ Shooter?
7706 Regis Kennedy GH FBI LHO
7505 Roger Craig WG POLICE
6512 William Whaley W WITNESS TSBD

Quick JFK Witness death Calculator: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjAk1JUWDMyRdDFSU3NVd29xWWNyekd2X1ZJYllKTnc#gid=78

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on June 4, 2014 in JFK

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 760 other followers